Re: Procedure for adopting a package?

George Danchev wrote: On Sunday 02 July 2006 23:53, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: --cut-- From the bug reports you've filed against calcurse it's clear to me that you probably are the perfect person to maintain it, so in the final analysis I have no issue with you becoming the maintainer.

Re: Proposal for collaborative maintenance of packages

skaller wrote: On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 03:35 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: .. Sorry, if you want Debian to make particular changes to make it easier to contribute, I suspect near universal agreement exists here that an ideal system would enable everyone to contribute according to t

Re: zoo: directory traversal security bug

Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote: Having a good relationship with upstream helps immensely especially if the maintainer doesn't know C or C++ or whatever the software is written in. Maybe that should be in the policy, too ;) We really should not take it to the absurd extremes. That is true, but w

Re: Question about next step

Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: I guess that at some point I need to do the identy verification step. How does that go? Do I locate some DDs near me and drop them an email and see if they are willing to sign my gpg key? One of the links I referred to earlier is http://nm.debian.org/gpg_offer.php an

Re: Question about next step

Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: I am interested in becoming a DD. I have asked for sponsorship for a couple of package I created. chora2, which fulfills an outstanding RFP, was graciously sponsored by Anibal (Thanks, Anibal!). It is now in the NEW queue. My question is what is the next step? I figure

Re: Re: RFS(2): autoreply - A safe, rate-limited auto-responder

You used a judgement to say judgements are not acceptable. Last time I checked, Debian did not have any opennings in the PC police department ;-) Richard P.S. PC (political correctness) for those hardcore geeks amongst us. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubsc

Re: RFS: kmec15 - An advanced Qt/KDE MEncoder frontend

Oded Shimon wrote: i would really advise to contact marillat for this A BIG thankyou for replying to my mail, just about the very first reply I got in Debian... Just one problem, umm, who is marillat?... How do I contact him/her? For those unfamiliar with Debian, we have a web in

Re: RFS: kmec15 - An advanced Qt/KDE MEncoder frontend

Oded Shimon wrote: i would really advise to contact marillat for this A BIG thankyou for replying to my mail, just about the very first reply I got in Debian... Just one problem, umm, who is marillat?... How do I contact him/her? For those unfamiliar with Debian, we have a web interface

Re: ITA: mpg321

Joe Drew wrote: Chris Anderson wrote: You definitely need to wait for a reply for at least a week, then generally try one last time to contact him. Hijacking it after 1 day isn't responsible and is sometimes considered rude, not everyone has access to email 24x7. I do agree that not waiting

Re: ITA: mpg321

Joe Drew wrote: Chris Anderson wrote: You definitely need to wait for a reply for at least a week, then generally try one last time to contact him. Hijacking it after 1 day isn't responsible and is sometimes considered rude, not everyone has access to email 24x7. I do agree that not waiting for at

Re: RFS: for several packages ;)

Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 04:26:50PM -0700, Richard A. Hecker wrote: Well he provoked me a little. Yep, I should don't answer for such advance, but unfortunatelly it's always stronger than me ;) There will always be people who provoke

Re: RFS: for several packages ;)

Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 04:26:50PM -0700, Richard A. Hecker wrote: Well he provoked me a little. Yep, I should don't answer for such advance, but unfortunatelly it's always stronger than me ;) There will always be people who provoke you. When

Re: request for buildd not used problem

Goswin von Brederlow wrote: GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 07:37:38PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: # Please email comments, corrections to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or [EMAIL PROTECTED] # See ChangeLog for history. %gradm: !ia64

Re: request for buildd not used problem

Goswin von Brederlow wrote: GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 07:37:38PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: # Please email comments, corrections to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or [EMAIL PROTECTED] # See ChangeLog for history. %gradm: !ia64 # [ANA

Re: keysigning at SCALE 2X?

Eric Wong wrote: > Hello, > > I'll be attending SCALE 2X in Los > Angeles and I'm wondering if I could meet some Debian developers to get > my GPG key signed and get myself going along the New Maintainer process. > We will have a booth there. There should be plent

Re: keysigning at SCALE 2X?

Eric Wong wrote: > Hello, > > I'll be attending SCALE 2X in Los > Angeles and I'm wondering if I could meet some Debian developers to get > my GPG key signed and get myself going along the New Maintainer process. > We will have a booth there. There should be plent

Re: Need help: difficult NM / requestor

On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 06:25:55PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote: > .. > > So he showed up on IRC today, demanded to talk to elmo (who didn't > answer), started to be not-quite-rude-but-still-not-very-smooth to > people present, and stated a few things that really got the heat > started. Namely,

Re: Need help: difficult NM / requestor

On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 06:25:55PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote: > .. > > So he showed up on IRC today, demanded to talk to elmo (who didn't > answer), started to be not-quite-rude-but-still-not-very-smooth to > people present, and stated a few things that really got the heat > started. Namely,

Re: Asking for an advocate (gURLChecker) ...

On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 01:22:03PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Daniel Pecos wrote: > > > Well, I ask for an advocate because of debian web page says this: > > .. > > > It's really hard to do the process to be a DD, so please, don't talk > > so hardly to pe

Re: signing a GPG key with multiple uids

Oohara Yuuma wrote: > When signing a GPG key, is it better to sign all of its uids, or > just an uid that I see relevant (such as the @debian.org one)? > I usually meet someone, get a hardcopy of the key fingerprint, > the e-mail address and so on, then check it later and sign the uid > which have

Re: signing a GPG key with multiple uids

Oohara Yuuma wrote: > When signing a GPG key, is it better to sign all of its uids, or > just an uid that I see relevant (such as the @debian.org one)? > I usually meet someone, get a hardcopy of the key fingerprint, > the e-mail address and so on, then check it later and sign the uid > which have