On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 16:17:03 -0500
Jacob Adams wrote:
> I have just filed an ITA on 9wm (#660496)
>
> It has been orphaned for a while and in that time the old upstream sadly
> passed away. A new upstream has popped up and continues to maintain the
> package.
> Is there any special process I need
s you're upstream, in future releases
you might consider fixing no-upstream-changelog. You don't have to do
that now, though. :)
Good luck getting your package into Debian,
Riley Baird
pgplVJkRv8csM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> > -You forgot to add a license section for the MIT license.
>
> I didn't forget. It's at the bottom of the file.
Thanks, I can see that now. Maybe I missed it before.
> > d/patches:
> > -Some patches don't have author/last-update information.
>
> I thought those were optional. I will add autho
onsor will greatly increase if you use a
VCS for the Debian packaging. You can then reference this using the
Vcs-Browser/Vcs-Git sections in d/control.
Good luck getting ori into Debian,
Riley Baird
pgpnt0CTurFAJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hdump"
Hi Paulo,
I'm not a DD, so I can't sponsor your package, but I had a look and I
can't see any problems.
Congratulations on a superb packaging effort, and good luck finding a
sponsor.
Cheers,
Riley Baird
pgpR_o
.dsc
This package is a dependency of geoproof.
Regards,
Riley Baird
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.0.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cunit"
Hi!
I'm not a DD, so I can't sponsor your package, but I had a look, and
here are some notes:
d/control:
-The link to your git repository doesn't seem to work.
d/copyright:
-In the LGPL license text, you've accidentally referred to the wrong
l
On Sat, 04 Jul 2015 01:41:57 +0200
Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Since a couple of weeks, my list of WNPP bugs is empty,
> but I know that I have a couple of them around:
> is a temporary bug ? is there a way to re-fill the list ?
I'm not sure. Which WNPP bugs do you have open?
pgpSttpma3jOc.pgp
Descr
On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 19:35:03 -0700
dp wrote:
> Hi Mentors,
>
> I am trying to create a .deb that has dependency on multiple
> opensource packages.
>
> These packages come from different sources . Few are available through
> apt-get, but few are on git clone or mirrored on personal websites.
> Th
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyqso"
That's great! I'm not a DD, so I can't sponsor your package, but here
are my thoughts:
d/changelog:
-As this is a new package, priority should be "low".
d/copyright:
-Remove the copyright symbol.
-If you worked on the package this year, you sho
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 16:28:08 +0100
Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 22-03-15 06:39, Riley Baird wrote:
> > -The upstream tarball contains embedded code copies of the java
> > version of antlr, which violates Debian policy.
>
> This depends on the license, but in general this statemen
packages for each incompatible python-antlr3 version, as needed?
Good luck getting your package into Debian,
Riley Baird
pgpz8m7QXb15K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> > d/changelog:
> > +You should only list versions of the package that will actually be in
> > Debian, so get rid of the vivid entry.
> > +The changes you make before the initial release generally aren't
> > important enough to go in the changelog.
> > +Generally, new packages should have priority
Sorry, I gave the wrong link in the previous email. I meant to say
https://github.com/pelliott80/simplescreenrecorder-dpm instead of
https://github.com/pelliott80/simplescreenrecorder-dpm/blob/upstream/debian/control
pgpDyu20yEhxs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> > > Please criticize the package I have been working on
> > > https://github.com/pelliott80/simplescreenrecorder-dpm.git
> > > in a git repo in dpm format.
> >
> > -Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser refer to the VCS of the Debian packaging, not
> > of upstream development
>
> Debian Policy Manual
>
the point of this file? If you don't need it, remove it.
general:
-Did Maarten Baert (v2) make the Debian package? In any case, if it's
your package, you should be listed as the maintainer.
Good luck getting your package into Debian,
Riley Baird
pgpp4cfI0Nj4x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Oh, and I forgot to mention: The bug you close in d/changelog should be
the ITP, not the RFS. The RFS will be closed automatically once the ITP
is closed.
pgpTpT7nOdACw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> So, does it look any better now?
Yes, a lot better! You're almost there, but just two more things:
-Add a d/source/format containing the only the string "3.0
(quilt)" (without the quotation marks). This ensures that your package
will use the new format for any patches you may make in future.
-
> Now btpd is not in Debian. Where can I find what happened to it,
> can I revive it and where is last debianization repository?
From this bug, it seems that it never was in Debian at all:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/158447
The links to the repositories are contained in the above repor
> Or they could keep the files from Nokia under LGPL2.1, and use
> GPL3+openssl exception for the rest of the files. Given that they have
> proper headers, I don't see a problem with that, although I would
> mention that in the readme.
But what license would the work as a whole be distributed a
think that Debian can legally distribute classified-ads, since Nokia
has not made the OpenSSL exception. On the other hand, I'm not sure if the LGPL
cancels this out. I'm going to ask debian-legal.
Good luck getting your package into Debian,
Riley Baird
pgpXjmJ8luLC3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ere: https://github.com/operatornormal/classified_ads/
and the Nokia-licensed files are here:
https://github.com/operatornormal/classified_ads/tree/master/textedit
Yours thankfully,
Riley Baird
pgpgNcejyDLEq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Since I have not found a sponsor for this package, and I have lost interest in
it, I am changing this ITP to an RFP.
If you are interested in packaging it, you might want to use the work I've
already done as a starting point:
https://gitorious.org/streql_debian/streql_debian
pgpBNkHZ0amRO.pgp
> I found unvanquished, which in my opinion is a good game:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694703
>
> But there is already a debian package, which is not part of debian repository:
> http://debs.unvanquished.net/unstable/
>
> Is it useful to repackage it from sources?
> Other
maintainer (closes: #623271).
* Upgraded to Debhelper 9/pybuild
* Bumped standards version to 3.9.6
* Added Vcs and Homepage fields to d/control
* Changed dependencies
* Added DEP-5 copyright
* Extended the description of slides-doc
* Updated source format to "3.0 (quilt)"
R
> But why i mail to this list? I always compile my packages and install them
> into
> /opt/ . I don't decide to you help me how to do them, I need to introduce me
> a
> good documenation above apt-get source and make package from apt-get source.
To install in opt for programs with a ./configu
On 24/01/15 09:39, Jacob Adams wrote:
> I have a source package, a game, that has a lot of resources. I
> was installing these at /usr/share/beret but I then received a
> lintian warning, arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share, which
> recommends that I split up the package. How can I spilt this
> pack
text should I keep?
*What do I do when the copyright year is unknown?
Yours sincerely,
Riley Baird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.or
On 13/01/15 21:40, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Riley Baird wrote:
>> On 12/01/15 12:37, Brian White wrote:
>>> I don't maintain Signify it any longer (or even use it) so feel free to do
>>> with it whatever you like.
>>
>>
On 14/01/15 12:46, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Riley Baird wrote:
>>> Typos in upstream code:
>>> equivilent -> equivalent
>>> ouput -> output
>>
>> Do these really have to be fixed? They won't be visible to the user, an
On 12/01/15 12:37, Brian White wrote:
> I don't maintain Signify it any longer (or even use it) so feel free to do
> with it whatever you like.
Hmm... does that mean that I need to adopt signify before
signify-openbsd will be accepted?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.de
Sorry, I just accidentally uploaded a package with two lintian tags
about d/copyright. I've just fixed them and the new package is now on .
You can get it using the command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/signify-openbsd/signify-openbsd_8-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
Thanks for the review
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/signify-openbsd/signify-openbsd_8-1.dsc
>>
>
> The package FTBFS here:
> |dh_auto_clean
> | make[1]: Entering directory
> '/build/signify-openbsd-EGTooy/signify-openbsd-8'
> | /bin/sh: 1: pkg-config: not found
> | Makefile:
On 09/01/15 09:02, Eriberto wrote:
> Hi Riley, how are you?
Good! How are you? Thank you for the review.
> I reviewed your package. My considerations:
>
> 1. d/changelog: upload to experimental, to honor the freeze policy[1].
>
> [1] https://release.debian.org/jessie/freeze_policy.html
Done.
> Please note that I am not a lawyer.
> If in doubt, please bring this issue to debian-legal.
I'm not a lawyer either, but I seem to have interpreted this differently
to you. I've forwarded this to debian-legal, so hopefully they can give
us a definitive answer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
Hi,
There has been some discussion on the debian-mentors list about
copyright and we'd like to get advice from debian-legal.
The original message (not written by me) is below.
Yours thankfully,
Riley Baird
Hello!
I personally use fbpdf pdf-viewer. I packaged it for myself,
but I
tion about signify can be obtained from
http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/signify
Yours sincerely,
Riley Baird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54ae2908.60...@bitmessage.ch
> First, it have no LICESNSE file, only main source file mention
> modified BSD. I twice mailed author, but seems that he ignored my
> request to add full-fledged LICENSE file. Second is that it do not
> make releases. And third, pure technical problem is that package
> provides binaries `fbpdf` an
On 02/01/15 09:11, Tristan Schmelcher wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2015 4:37 PM, "Riley Baird" <
> bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, I'm not a DD, so I can't sponsor your package, but I looked at your
>> package and here
Section:libs in the source
package, you can remove the section field from libgaminggear0 and
libgaminggear-common.
Good luck getting your package into Debian!
Riley Baird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54a5be17.3050...@bitmessage.ch
editable
and calendars can be printed.
.
It is written in C++ using the Qt libraries, and is
based on the libhdate code and zmanim-java-API.
Good luck getting your package into Debian!
Riley Baird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54a5b1d1.1010...@bitmessage.ch
>> * d/copyright does not list all copyright holders/years. Look in
>> each source file, and try to note the copyright data for each
>> file.
> I assume you are referring here to the Software Industry Promotion
> Agency which I have now added to d/copyright
Yep! Except, I just noticed one more th
>> I'm not a DD, so I can't sponsor your package, but if you want,
>> I'll take a look at it over the next couple of days.
>
> That would be great! I have just uploaded an updated version that
> is lintian clean although the watchfile still appears to be
> broken.
>
> Thank you for your quick res
On 29/12/14 12:52, Jacob Adams wrote:
> I have been working to fix all the lintian warnings for my package
> swapspace ( http://mentors.debian.net/package/swapspace )
>
> The only outstanding warning is debian-watch-file-missing-version
> which I cannot figure out how to fix. My watchfile has a v
gt; dependencies automatically
>
> 2014-12-29 0:32 GMT+02:00 Riley Baird <
> bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch>:
>
>> On 29/12/14 09:08, Yuri Oleynikov (יורי אולייניקוב wrote:
>>> Hello all
>>>
>>> So happened i'm maintainer
On 29/12/14 09:08, Yuri Oleynikov (יורי אולייניקוב wrote:
> Hello all
>
> So happened i'm maintainer of debian packages in my company.
> And i have the following situation:
> There're several deb packages that using debconf to ask user input during
> installation, apply initial configuration, etc
sary.
* To fix the lintian tag "debian-control-has-unusual-field-spacing",
make sure that there is only one space after each of the "Depends:"
fields, instead of two. (You'll need to change lines 25 and 32.)
Good luck getting your package into Debian!
Riley Baird
--
T
and I can't see any problems. The only thing which I can think of
would be that the "no-upstream-changelog" lintian tag could be solved by
considering the upstream NEWS file to be a changelog file.
Good luck getting your package into Debian!
Riley Baird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On 22/12/14 23:40, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:50:59 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 09:30:45PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
>>>>> * In d/changelog, urgency should be "low" since it's a new
>>>&g
* It may be a good idea to make releases as tarballs still, instead of
just making Debian releases, so that other distros can benefit as
well.
>>>
>>> Alternatively, he/she can tag the releases in git.
>>
>> True, that would also work. (Although it has the disadvantage that it
>> mak
On 22/12/14 01:08, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 09:03:51PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
>> * In d/changelog, urgency should be "low" since it's a new
>> package
> Is this documented somewhere?
My mentor had told me upon the second upload of m
>> * There's a newer upstream version
>
> The package contains the HEAD of the master branch from a few hours
> ago since upstream just committed some new changes. There is
> technically no newer version. What upstream branched/tagged as 1.2.2
> is 1.2.1 + a cherry pick of 1 commit but due to the
IOS is needed.
I don't have one, so I can't really do any more testing. Also, is it
possible to make much use of this package without a non-free BIOS? If
not, the package may have to go into non-free, instead of main.
I can tell that you've gone to a LOT of work to package this. Pleas
On 21/12/14 19:58, Cameron Norman wrote:
> El sáb, 20 de dic 2014 a las 11:30 , Riley Baird
> escribió:
>> On 21/12/14 07:02, Tong Sun wrote:
>>> Package: sponsorship-requests
>>> Severity: wishlist
>>>
>>> Dear mentors,
>>>
&g
ional", not "extra".
* This isn't important, but it would be nice if you put the histring
manpage outside of the Debian directory when you make your next upstream
release. This way, other distros and people who build from source will
also benefit from the manpage.
* There are
link [1] describes methods
for converting init scripts to systemd.
As for an example, here is a sysvinit script [2]. The corresponding
systemd script is slightly down the page in [1].
Hopefully, this has been clear. :)
Yours sincerely,
Riley Baird
[1] http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/s
On 14/12/14 15:15, T o n g wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the trick to have different programs use same man page when
> packaging a Debian package?
>
> E.g., say I'm packaging gzip, and I want both `man gzip` and `man gunzip`
> goes to the same man file. How can I make it happen?
Looking at the gz
>> * d/docs is empty. You should include dbab.html.
>
> You meant this?
>
> echo 'dbab.html' > debian/docs
Yep!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/
On 13/12/14 05:50, Bhavyanshu Parasher wrote:
>
> Adding a follow-up to the RFS informing about the update in package. The
> new URL for .dsc file has changed since the version has been incremented
> after adding new patches. Please use this one.
>
> dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian
> I'd like to bring your attention again to dbab, the innovative
> dnsmasq-based ad-blocker that will benefit most people. I'll keep
> reposting this request regularly in hoping someone will pay attention
> to it. Here is my sales-pitch again:
I'm not a DD, so I can't sponsor your package, but her
I agree, it is sometimes difficult to get someone to actually upload
your package.
Perhaps to encourage mentors, they too could get accomplishments for
sponsoring packages. There could even be a small prize for the DD who
sponsors the most packages in a given year.
On 11/11/14 08:12, Roger Light
>> Tasks
>> =
>>
>> I see a task having, at least, the following properties:
>>
>> * A specific objective (bug fix, enhancement, debugging, cleanup,
>> documentation, translation, ...). This should probably be tied to a
>> Debian bug number.
>
> I would like for check-all-the-things
ose the files are in the order of 200,000 records each. Or, if in
> banking, or government applications, in the order of 20 million records per
> file.
>
> Regards
> Leslie
> Mr. Leslie Satenstein
> Montréal Québec, Canada
>
>
>
> From: Riley Baird
>
On 30/10/14 01:34, Leslie S Satenstein wrote:
> Hi Riley
>
> Suppose the strings are 10k bytes each (10240), but they differ at byte zero,
> where is the break instruction to stop the compare?
Why would there need to be a break instruction? That would mean that the
time taken to compare strings
On 29/10/14 19:55, Richard van den Berg wrote:
> On 28-10-14 20:59 , Riley Baird wrote:
>> As far as I can tell, your code ensures that even if the strings are of
>> different length, an equality calculation should be performed anyway,
>> however returning 0, on the grounds th
On 29/10/14 17:00, Joel Rees wrote:
> 2014/10/29 4:59 "Riley Baird" <
> bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch>:
>>
>> On 29/10/14 00:20, Joel Rees wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Riley Baird
>>> wrote:
>>>>
visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/streql
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/streql/streql_3.0.2-1.dsc
Changes since last upload:
* Initial release (Closes: #764443)
Regards,
R
On 04/09/14 07:01, FERNANDO CROWLEY wrote:
> looking for some direction where to start contributing newbie
> Thanks
>
https://www.debian.org/intro/help
sudo apt-get install how-can-i-help
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian
ha1.h appear to be in the public domain
I haven't been able to test the software yet since libstrophe hasn't
been accepted yet, but I can see that it's in the NEW queue.
Good luck on getting your package into Debian,
Riley Baird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-re
Hi Benedikt,
I'm not a DD, so I can't sponsor your package, and I don't have the
Indoor Air Monitor, so I can't test it. However, looking over your
package, afaict everything is fine, except you should remove the
unnecessary comments in d/rules and d/watch.
Great job on the p
>> d/control:
>> -Don't put each dependency on a different line.
>
> This is actually common practice as having them on separate lines makes it
> easier to review a diff for future versions.
Okay, thanks, I didn't know that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
your package.
Good luck in getting your package into Debian!
Riley Baird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53fc3b53.4080...@bitmessage.ch
upstream
> version. The commit 7810c7afd8 was registered on 2014-06-17.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Eriberto
>
>
> 2014-08-25 5:25 GMT-03:00 Riley Baird
> :
>> I just found out how to make a watch file that works with
>> python3-pyelliptic. As it turns out, the main
I just found out how to make a watch file that works with
python3-pyelliptic. As it turns out, the maintainer uploads releases to
PyPI, so a watch file can be generated.
I've had to change the version number of the .orig.tar.gz, as I'm using
one made from a git snapshot. (I can't use the given tar
> 1. d/control: create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can
> use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to
> d/control.
Done (I've used Gitorious).
> 2. d/copyright:
> - The code is GPL-3, not GPL-3+.
> - The upstream range years is 2010-2014.
Chan
I've just created a repo on pkg-gnustep. You can find it here:
git+ssh://your_alioth_usern...@scm.alioth.debian.org//git/pkg-gnustep/pkg-gmastermind.app.git
I've also added corresponding Vcs-Git: and Vcs-Browser: fields in d/control.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debi
S with pkg-gnustep's Alioth
project?
Yours thankfully,
Riley Baird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53dcc069.2030...@bitmessage.ch
>> As for a VCS, I've heard a lot about having one. tbh, gmastermind.app
>> probably won't need one, as it doesn't look like it will be upgraded any
>> time in the future, but I'm fine either way.
>
> That's no point. The *packaging* might change over time and if you want
> some help in packaging
>>> You can add this yourself in the task list, they should be self explanatory.
>>
>> Are you talking about this task list:
>> http://blends.debian.org/junior/tasks/puzzle ? If so, I don't see
>> anywhere that I can edit it. Do I need to be part of the Alioth project
>> first?
>
> This is maintai
> You can add this yourself in the task list, they should be self explanatory.
Are you talking about this task list:
http://blends.debian.org/junior/tasks/puzzle ? If so, I don't see
anywhere that I can edit it. Do I need to be part of the Alioth project
first?
> Join the Debian Jr Alioth project
"Recommends" field of the junior-puzzle package.
If you are interested, or just want more information, then please do not
hesitate to respond!
Thanks for reading,
Riley Baird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&quo
Due to consensus from upstream, and the Debian project, I have uploaded
a new version of the package, with the copyright file modified to
indicate that the entire package is licensed under GPL-2+.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
a small omission. The source
> files and the COPYING file have priority!
>
> Given this, I already consider all my contributions under the "GPL v2
> or later" clause.
>
> Riccardo
>
> On 2014-07-22 09:26:48 +0200 Riley Baird
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Riccardo,
&
t GPL v2+ file from fsf, it had even the old FSF address.
> Perhaps that statement should be removed totally and just COPYING should
> be included.
>
> Riccardo
>
> Riley Baird wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm currently packaging GMastermind for Debian. In the proces
On 14/07/14 19:45, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Riley Baird wrote:
>> If you're worried about the incompatibility between LGPL3 and GPL2,
>> you don't have to be. gmastermind.app is only linking to the LGPL3
>> libraries, so the copyleft doesn't apply to it
> Well, it could be argued if this little notice in README carries more
> legal weight than the intent expressed in the source files (the notice
> does not follow the recommended form and gpl.txt is missing)...
>
> We (pkg-gnustep) had an inititive 6 or 7 years ago to re-check the
> licenses of al
lly possible; if so:
I grant anyone the right to use this my contributions to the program
"GMastermind" for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such
conditions are required by law.
-----
Thanks in advance,
Riley Baird
> I don't think that this was the author's intention. There are plenty
> of Info.plist files where GPL 2.0 is stated, but it doesn't mean "GPL
> 2.0 only". To be sure, you could clarify with upstream (write to
> gap-dev-disc...@nongnu.org rather than via Savannah's interface).
>From a legal poin
On 11/07/14 17:46, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Thanks for packaging a GNUstep game. Unfortunately I can't sponsor.
That's okay!
>> * License : GPL2
>
> The license is GPL-2+, AFAICS.
*Most* of GMastermind is released under GPL-2+. However, the README
indicates that, as a whole, GMastermind
89 matches
Mail list logo
