Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

for uploading the package! I saw in ftp-master [1] that the package was built but it is only showing for amd64, however the package architecture is linux-any. Shouldn't it been build for other architectures, like ppc64le? Is something I missed in the package? Regards, Roberto Oliveira -- [1] -

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

On Sat, 9 Sep 2017 00:00:30 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin <w...@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 03:48:10PM -0300, Roberto Oliveira wrote: > > > W: oprofile-jit: package-has-unnecessary-activation-of-ldconfig-trigger > > oprofile-jit installs a file under /etc/l

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

Hi Andrey, On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 22:33:48 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > dpkg-gencontrol: warning: Depends field of package libopagent-dev: unknown > substitution variable ${shlibs:Depends} Fixed. > I: oprofile source: duplicate-short-description libopagent1 libopagent-dev

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

Hi Andrey, On Sat, 2 Sep 2017 22:44:24 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > libopagent.so should be in -dev. Fixed. > I think /etc/ld.so.conf.d/oprofile-jit.conf should be in oprofile-jit. Fixed. > I think you had a .symbols file for libopagent1, you should use it again. Fixed.

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

Hi Andrey, I found something wrong in the last version I sent, so I just sent a new version. So in case you already did a "dget -x", please, do it again. Regards, Roberto Oliveira.

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

Hi Andrey, On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 22:52:12 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Please upgrade to the current Standards-Version. Fixed. > Why do you use "rm `find . -name "*.la"`" instead of "find . -name "*.la" > -delete"? Fixed > Why do you ship static versions of the plugins?

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

Hi Andrey, On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 23:52:48 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin <w...@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:45:56PM -0300, Roberto Oliveira wrote: > > > I still see a lot of old junk in debian/control: > > > - did you write that Build-Depends? if no, ple

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

Hi Andrey, I think I did all the changes you suggested, can you take a look on it again, please? > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > I still see a lot of old junk in debian/control: > - did you write that Build-Depends? if no, please write them from scratch, > making sure they are complete and

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

Thanks for reviewing it Andrey! I tried to apply your suggestions in the package and also made some other improvements. Hope it looks better now.

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/oprofile Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/oprofile/oprofile_1.2.0-1.dsc Regards, Roberto Oliveira