-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I would like to change the name of a source package; is there anything
non-package-specific thing to do apart from simply using the new name in
debian/changelog? I mean adding new header fields, etc.
Thanks,
- --
cc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Amaya,
Amaya wrote:
> Sorry for my really long silence.
> I see this version is still not in Debian. Should I upload?
Yes, please. Thanks!
- --
cc
> Székelyi Szabolcs wrote:
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors / Multimedia Team / Sam,
I am (still) looking for a sponsor for my package "vamp-plugin-sdk".
This is needed to build Sonic Visualiser, which is a very interesting
piece of software for music analysis. It's far more than a usual audio
ana
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry, the correct web address for Sonic Visualiser is:
http://www.sonicvisualiser.org/
- --
cc
SZÉKELYI Szabolcs wrote:
> Dear mentors / Multimedia Team / Sam,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vamp-plugin-sdk".
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors / Multimedia Team / Sam,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vamp-plugin-sdk". This is
needed to build Sonic Visualiser, which is a very interesting piece of
software for music analysis. It's far more than a usual audio analyzer.
Y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vamp-plugin-sdk".
* Package name: vamp-plugin-sdk
Version : 1.1b-1
Upstream Author : Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.vamp-plugins.org/
* License
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leo "costela" Antunes wrote:
> Székelyi Szabolcs wrote:
>> What's the usual way of handling "preX" upstream version numbers in
>> watch files? I'm having trouble because uscan considers 1.0pre3 newer
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi mentors,
What's the usual way of handling "preX" upstream version numbers in
watch files? I'm having trouble because uscan considers 1.0pre3 newer
than 1.0.
Thanks,
- --
cc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Should I copy in debian/copyright the old address or the new one? Or
> maybe should I change also the address contained in the license
> statement in the source code files?
debian/copyright is the license for the packaging
/pool/main/l/libvrb
- - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- - dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvrb/libvrb_0.5.1-5.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Székelyi Szabolcs
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 05:33:29PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
>
>> I want to run software only from Stable (ie Etch) when I am doing
>> non-debian related work. However, when I am doing debian related work
>> (ex :- fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charles Plessy wrote:
> As one of the program I package was recently automakified, I had to
> change debian/rules to deal with this. While comparing with other
> packages, I realised that often $(MAKE) is used instead of make in
> debian/rules. In case
Hi,
I have a package which depends on linux-image-2.6.16-2-686 (from
backports.org). I can't install it with apt-get because:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
morg: Depends: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686 but it is not going to be installed
However, I can install linux-image-2.6.16-2-
Hi,
> On 1/24/07, Székelyi Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a package called morg-mailcommands that depends on Postfix.
> > Trying to install it with aptitude gives
> (...)
>
> You are missing some important pieces of information:
>
> 1) How
Hi,
I have a package called morg-mailcommands that depends on Postfix.
Trying to install it with aptitude gives
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> E: Unable to correct dependencies, some packages cannot be installed
> E: Unable to resolve some dependencies!
> Some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
andremachado wrote:
> # EXT_DIR=`/usr/bin/php-config --extension-dir`;
> EXT_DIR = $(shell /usr/bin/php-config --extension-dir);
This is not an assignment in this form. Try removing the spaces
surrounding the "=". Didn't you get something li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luca Bedogni wrote:
> Hi mentors
> made my first libpackage and the program is the following.
> When i launch pbuilder on another package that uses my library-package i got
> that he can't use the include. I use the package from a local reposito
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Loic Le Guyader wrote:
> Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz nul-unu.com> writes:
>> I: harminv: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/harminv.1.gz:180
>
> I don't have that problem ! My lintian don't report anything like that !
Run lintian with -I :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 11:34:14PM +0100, Sz?kelyi Szabolcs wrote:
>> can anyone tell why ftpds do conflict with each other and why httpds do
>> not?
>
> Actually the httpds should conflict too as they install listeners on
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
can anyone tell why ftpds do conflict with each other and why httpds do
not? In case of MTAs, the conflict is reasonable due to the possibility
of accessing a mailbox at the same time, but I can't see the point in
the case of ftpds.
Thanks,
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Amaya wrote:
> Székelyi Szabolcs wrote:
>> I've posted an [0]RFS about 2 weeks ago, but the package has received
>> no attention from official developers.
>
> I'll upload it. Sorry I missed your RFS.
Thanks. A package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've posted an [0]RFS about 2 weeks ago, but the package has received no
attention from official developers.
What is the usual procedure in this case? Wait longer, re-post the RFS
or try to accept that the package will never be a part of Debian?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Mentors,
when adopting a package, sould I first contact the original maintainer
and the the retitle the 'O:' bug to 'ITA:' or retitle it first and
contact the maintainer afterwards?
As I remember, a non-dd is allowed to adopt a package, am I rig
ry: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- - dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvrb/libvrb_0.5.1-3.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
- --
Székelyi Szabolcs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ming Hua wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 11:14:51PM +0200, Székelyi Szabolcs wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Ming Hua wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:10:32AM +0200, Székelyi Szabolcs wrote:
>>>> James Westby
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florent Rougon wrote:
> Székelyi Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> That's right. But why is Replaces needed in the case of an MTA? If a
>> package Providing mail-transport-agent is installed, and the user is
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florent Rougon wrote:
> Székelyi Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The soversion is usually added to the -dev package name to be able to
>> support multiple versions of a library off-line, which means all
>> versions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Ming Hua wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:10:32AM +0200, Székelyi Szabolcs wrote:
>> James Westby wrote:
>>
>>> * Do you need Replaces: libvrb-dev as well?
>> I have seen similar (ie. development) packages with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Westby wrote:
> On (26/09/06 22:09), Székelyi Szabolcs wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libvrb". This is an update to
>> the (so far unsponsored) previous version 0.5.1-1.
>>
>
> H
bian/pool/main/l/libvrb/libvrb_0.5.1-2.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Székelyi Szabolcs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFGYjgGJRwVVqzMkMRArOFAJkBAHgjgvMcD8a1QCywyzxLC4JH7ACcCIt4
feI8bNqPoWgzxWajSJzPDnk=
=VpSy
-E
on-free
- - dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvrb/libvrb_0.5.1-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Székelyi Szabolcs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFE3oC5GJRwVVqzMkMRAnL+AJ9dKEJY+HTzICw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eddy Petrisor wrote:
> Székelyi Szabolcs wrote:
>>> I'm packaging a simple library building a shared lib and a development
>>> package as usual. The -dev package depends on the one containing the
>>> shared library.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm packaging a simple library building a shared lib and a development
package as usual. The -dev package depends on the one containing the
shared library. Policy says that it is permitted in this situation to
symlink documentation coming with the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 05:18:47PM +0200, Sz?kelyi Szabolcs wrote:
>> I've sent an ITP on libvrb last night (at about 23:19 CET), but I cannot
>> see it on d-d and in the BTS. However, I got the copy to my personal
>> inbox.
> Do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've sent an ITP on libvrb last night (at about 23:19 CET), but I cannot
see it on d-d and in the BTS. However, I got the copy to my personal
inbox. I saw ITPs on d-d and in the BTS posted this afternoon.
Is it possible that the ITPs are not proc
35 matches
Mail list logo
