Looks like this will need sponsoring after all:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 23:55 +0800, Guo Yixuan wrote:
Please unblock package gcc-4.7-doc
I guess you know already, but 4.7.2-2 got rejected by dak because,
similarly to the no NEW packages from
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote:
retitle 619933 RFP: gcc-4.6-doc -- documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc,
gobjc, g++)
retitle 656044 RFP: gcc-4.6-doc -- documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc,
gobjc, g++)
noowner 619933
stop
Hello Samuel,
The
It's getting to the point where I think it would be best if we do one
of two things:
1. Split out sponsorship-requests bug mail to a new mailing list.
2. Stop sending it anywhere, and let people subscribe through the PTS
if they care.
How about you?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com, 2012-02-27, 21:20:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tack/tack_1.07-1~mentors7.dsc
(The new stuff can wait for a release.)
Okay.
There's a typo in the copyright file
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com wrote:
But note that Thomas Dickey has prepared a snapshot which is supposed
to do patch #03's job a different way, and fix that dpkg-shlibdeps
warning:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ncurses/2012-02/msg00022.html
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com, 2012-02-25, 22:43:
+ ... except with autoconf-dickey it doesn't, so use autotools-dev's
dh_ commands; bump build-depends to autotools-dev (= 20100122.1)
accordingly. (Yes, even
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com, 2012-02-25, 22:43:
+ ... except with autoconf-dickey it doesn't, so use autotools-dev's
dh_ commands; bump
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com, 2012-02-26, 17:49:
* Fix hyphen-used-as-minus-sign warning from lintian.
This patch...
* New patch 03-allow-echoing-compilation-commands.patch, which enables
printing of compilation
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com, 2012-02-26, 17:49:
* Fix hyphen-used-as-minus-sign warning from lintian.
This patch...
* New patch 03-allow
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com, 2012-02-24, 18:32:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tack/tack_1.07-1~mentors3.dsc
Arno is breaking mentors.d.n at the moment, so I took a look at git
repository instead. (I'm
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com, 2012-02-20, 14:50:
* Bump debhelper build-depends: to (= 7.0.50~), since we use
override_dh_foo targets.
This should be omitted from the changelog, given that it's…
* Add support
=%3cE1RoTeW%2d000805%2d4f%40hydrogen%3e
Kind regards,
Samuel Bronson
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
in the doc directory.
* Update debian/copyright to current (nearly-1.0) DEP5 format.
* Add support for dpkg-buildflags(1) by bumping debhelper to
compatibility level 9.
-- Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:12:03 -0500
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com, 2012-02-16, 19:29:
tack (1.07-2) unstable; urgency=low
tack (1.07-1) unstable; urgency=low
Please merge these two into a single 1.07-1.
How about this:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote:
Le Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 05:42:29AM +, Samuel Bronson a écrit :
Russ Allbery rra at debian.org writes:
Daniel Stender daniel at danielstender.com writes:
For the very next of my commits,
1) what URI should I
in the doc directory.
* Update debian/copyright to current (nearly-1.0) DEP5 format.
* Closes: #660140 (ITP for this package).
-- Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:40:07 -0500
tack (1.07-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
* Adopt package.
* Switch
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Michael Gilbert
michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Stephen Gran wrote:
Even if we did think it was a good idea, account
creation is entirely automatic and on demand - we have no way of
ensuring people have read and agreed to
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Nikita V. Youshchenko yo...@debian.org
wrote:
In good old days when I had time and motivation to maintain gcc-doc, I've
used git repos to managed entire thing.
I've just created
Russ Allbery rra at debian.org writes:
Daniel Stender daniel at danielstender.com writes:
For the very next of my commits,
1) what URI should I give to the very next commits, and should I just
just disregard the Lintian complain
For right now, I would ignore the complaint and use an
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Nikita V. Youshchenko yo...@debian.org wrote:
I will try to look sometime soon, but can't promise when.
Hello Samuel
The gcc-doc thing you've done looks great, however it is incomplete.
Complete solution consists of gcc-doc-defaults package [contrib], and
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Nikita V. Youshchenko yo...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org
wrote:
Samuel, thanks for doing this. However, I'm trying to get gcc-4.5
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
Samuel, thanks for doing this. However, I'm trying to get gcc-4.5 removed
from unstable soonish, so I would like to see this for gcc-4.6 (and 4.7
Dear GCC Maintainers,
Perhaps I should have CC'd you in the first place, but here's a copy now:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:38 AM
Subject: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
Samuel, thanks for doing this. However, I'm trying to get gcc-4.5 removed
from unstable soonish, so I would like to see this for gcc-4.6 (and 4.7 as
found in experimental). Could you do this? Nikita, could you sponsor the
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net wrote:
Hello List:
I am working on the bibtool package.
The changelog of the upstream package is in XML format and is named
`Changes.xml'.
Right now, I manage it by adding an override in the debian/rules file:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net wrote:
Thanks for your reply:
You're quite welcome.
On 23/01/12 19:54, Samuel Bronson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Jerome BENOITg62993...@rezozer.net
wrote:
Is there a better way to deal
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com, 2012-01-21, 13:44:
* Package name : gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg
Does non-dfsg really need to be a part of source package name? What if
FSF decides to free the documentation one day
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 05:09:35PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com, 2012-01-21, 00:38:
* Package name : gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg
Does non-dfsg really need to be a part of source package name
/pool/non-free/g/gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg/gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg_4.5.3-1.dsc
It would be nice if someone could upload the package or, failing that,
tell me what I must still change before it can be uploaded.
Thanks,
Samuel Bronson
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me
29 matches
Mail list logo
