On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
d/*.install:
The files are starting by a line #!/usr/bin/dh-exec I admit
I have never seen this before even if I suspect this might be
somewhere in the docs which you have definitely read in a way more
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Beren Minor
beren.minor+deb...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, I also have a GemRB package that requires sponsorship. I've
recently joined the Debian Games Team to maintain it, but I have
little time to chase sponsors. So, if you have some time to spend and
want to have a
Hi Andrey,
Would you also be interested in packaging dwarf fortress?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588377
I can help sponsor, but I'm not a df player -- I will have to trust
your evaluation of the functionality of the package.
I think dwarf fortress should be packaged before
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Scott Howard show...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Rodolfo kix Garcia k...@kix.es wrote:
Hi Scott,
please, see the comments to your mail below. IMO this comments are fine,
but there are more important things:
1. Can you sponsor me
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Rodolfo kix Garcia k...@kix.es wrote:
About 1: I don't know what to do. I can maintain the current code or change
to new debhelper and compat.
Your choice. I'd say maintain current code, no need to bump the
version unless you really need some feature.
I never
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Rodolfo kix Garcia k...@kix.es wrote:
Hi Scott,
please, see the comments to your mail below. IMO this comments are fine,
but there are more important things:
1. Can you sponsor me to upload the package?
Yes, I'll sponsor it, but I need to spend more time
Hello Rodolfo and Paul,
Please CC me to replies. I just did a QA upload to fix an RC bug in
wmaker, I didn't see that you were already working on it (otherwise I
could have just worked with you!)
I saw Paul's given helpful advice on the package, I wanted to add some
comments about d/rules
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Scott Howard show...@debian.org, 2011-12-30, 11:36:
Also, I'm not too familiar with this package, but is there any reason why
you want to explicitly set DEB_BUILD and DEB_HOST types in debian/rules?
Please see: /usr/share
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
Don't get me wrong, in my opinion (some of) these things are good. But
making a big fuss about them is not helping anybody. It only distracts
attention from things that are important, and creates false impression that
they are
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
Dear reviewers, next time if you are going to complain about:
- debian/compat being too low;
There are cases where it should be bumped [1], support for old
versions gets removed. Many sponsors take the approach What should be
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
Don't get me wrong, in my opinion (some of) these things are good. But
making a big fuss about them is not helping anybody. It only distracts
attention from things that are important, and creates false impression that
they are
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Wolodja Wentland babi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've recently started to work on some packages and am not sure if I follow
best practices when packaging software from git repositories with
git-buildpackage.
My main point of confusion is that I don't really
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
I forgot to close #610981 when I released roxterm 1.21.4-1. I guess I
should fix this by sending a message to 610981-done@b.d.o but I'm not
100% sure what to do about debian/changelog. I think I should add
(Closes:
Hi Pauel
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Paul Reddy p...@kereru.org wrote:
Hi,
[I hope this is the right group. Apologies if not]
I've built a reasonably comprehensive backup and disaster recovery app,
and am looking for some help on the next steps, the first of which I
believe is to find
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all
I have a similar question. I am using:
override_dh_auto_build:
make doc
...
How to perform this section only on binary-independent packages?
from the dh manpage:
Finally, remember that you are not
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 8:10 AM, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 21:59:59 -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package 0ad.
* Package name : 0ad
[..]
haven't checked the package, but given I'd like to play it, I tried to
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 9:44 AM, The Fungi fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 10:21:57AM +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
[...]
I'd like the docs only to be built *once* on the build server, not for
every architecture, since they are architecture independent and building
them for every
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Michele Gastaldo
michelu...@inventati.org wrote:
Hi all
Trying to package kpartsplugin (ITP: bug #597110), I get a warning from
lintian (wrong-name-for-upstream-changelog): there's a ChangeLog file from
upstream I listed in debian/docs, but according to the
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Kete frenzf...@yahoo.com wrote:
These are actually warnings:
W: icecat: extra-license-file usr/lib/icecat-3.6.15/LICENSE
W: icecat: extra-license-file
usr/lib/icecat-3.6.15/extensions/https-everywh...@eff.org/LICENSE.txt
W: icecat: extra-license-file
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Upstream doesn't have any sort of version control for this project. A quick
Googling suggests that this is, however, for version control on the Debian
site, which is neat. However, it looks like only DD's get accounts
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:34 PM, R Alemi alemi.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I am seeking a sponsor to package OSCAR (Open Source Clinical
Application Resources) on Debian and Ubuntu.
OSCAR is an Electronic Medical Records suite
I
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Chris Baines cbain...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package fgrun.
* Package name : fgrun
Version : 1.5.2-1
Upstream Author : Frederic Bouvier (Project admin)
fr...@users.sourceforge.net
* URL :
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Michael m.b3...@web.de wrote:
Hi again,
Hope this is a more intelligent question than the last one ;-)
I want to get rid of
W: libsnacc0c2: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libasn1c++0
libasn1cCebuf0 libasn1cebuf0 libasn1cmbuf0 libasn1csbuf0 libasn1ctbl0
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:12 PM,
travis+ml-debian-ment...@subspacefield.org wrote:
Standards-Version: 3.8.4 should be 3.9.1
I used the dh tools to make this, and I've seen debuild complain
about this, but really didn't know what I should be doing in this
case - funny thing is, both tools were
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com wrote:
TOR not having their act together - does that mean that they haven't
released a stable version yet or that no stable package is in Debian?
Would you be interested in packaging and maintaining TOR in Debian?
Sorry, just
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:42 PM,
travis+ml-debian-ment...@subspacefield.org wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-packages?action=details;package=polipo-tor;seeksponsor=0
Not asking for a sponsor right now since it depends on pkgs not in deb/ubu
repos.
But would like
library's filename). I know your package lacks a SONAME, but you can
add one like the enet package does. their binary makes a library with
the SONAME libenet.so.0debian1, so their binary package is
libenet0debian1 and their source package name is enet.
Didn't know that it was possible to
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Johey Shmit joheysh...@yahoo.com wrote:
I took zlib as a guideline and named it after the upstream name.
Because version '4.26', '4.27', etc. are not binary compatible I
added the '4.26' to the package name. That way different versions
should be installable in
2011/1/11 Fernando Mercês nand...@gmail.com:
Hello, Manuel.
Many thanks for your support.
I've fixed the problems and now I'm providing unsigned source and binary
packages at http://www.mentebinaria.com.br/coding40/pev_0.22-r2.tar.gz
I think it's enough to get reviews, right? Before upload,
2011/1/11 Fernando Mercês nand...@gmail.com:
Hello, Scott.
I have read in the Mentor's wiki that is a good idea ask for help here
before upload the package. ;)
If it's not the common way, please let me know.
The mentors wiki says that you should ask people here for a review
before uploading
2011/1/11 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com:
Hello again,
On Tuesday 11 January 2011 22:50:45 Fernando Mercês wrote:
Scott, thank you. It's very clear for me now.
I have just uploaded my package.
I don't know where you get the instructions, but I think that you got
Thanks for looking at these - I've seen this library mentioned on
Debian Games mailing lists/wiki every once and a while. Do you know of
a free alternative? I see on Ubuntu RFP [1] for this library that
someone suggested something like http://sam.zoy.org/flessd.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:28 AM,
Am 17.12.2010 20:59, schrieb Bill Cox:
In my case, I wrote and maintain both the code and debian directory,
so I see no need for me to use the quilt patch system, though I do use
it in maintaining other packages for Vinux.
Thanks,
Bill
Hi Bill,
Please take a look at [1], and a little
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
I want to get roxterm 1.20.x into Debian but there's 1.18.5-3 in testing
waiting for Squeeze's release. Should 1.20.x go into experimental
instead of unstable? If so do I do this just by putting experimental
instead of
regards
Scott Howard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikanxrpwutfcf=dx=b1utsjucwll7vtsvmyp...@mail.gmail.com
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Daniel Stender dan...@danielstender.com wrote:
question: if I am adopting a packet, what's the procedure for altering
debian/copyright (dep5)?
Since I've learned that the Maintainer: field is for the upstream
developer, should I just take
over the copyright
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote:
Le Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 01:02:25PM +0100, Daniel Lombraña González a écrit :
After that, I kept reading about git-buildpackage and it seems that it
should be more easy to maintain those differences between the upstream
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Givors Fabien
fabien.giv...@chezlefab.net wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libclanlib2.2.
I'll try to take a look at the package for non-DD review later - but I
also wanted to point out the debian games team [1] who can also
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Givors Fabien
fabien.giv...@chezlefab.net wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libclanlib2.2.
Non-DD review:
1) An earlier version of this package is already in Debian. I think
you really should (probably must) talk with the
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org wrote:
Unfortunately, proposals such as the collaborative package review by Charles
Plessy [2] haven't caught any attention. In particular, this is a call to
people
not being DD (yet): Everyone could review packages,
Thanks for packaging fritzing, btw - it's a good tool to have in Debian.
2010/10/31 Enrique Hernández Bello ehbe...@gmail.com:
2010/10/26 Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com
2010/10/24 Enrique Hernández Bello ehbe...@gmail.com:
1) instead of CDBS and explicitly using quilt, would you consider
n Fri, 2010-10-29 at 18:42 +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.2-1
of my package morse.
Hello,
Non-DD review:
looks good in general.
$ lintian --pedantic -I
-i /var/cache/pbuilder/sid-amd64/result/morse_2.2-1_amd64.changes
P: morse:
2010/10/24 Enrique Hernández Bello ehbe...@gmail.com:
What is the next step? :)
--
Enrique Hernández Bello
Hi Enrique,
I'm not a DD yet, but I learned a lot from sponsors being extremely
picky about my packages. Here are some comments for you to consider:
1) instead of CDBS and explicitly
unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libcdk5/libcdk5_5.0.20060507-3.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Scott Howard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
version
(5.7.0-2) targeted at unstable.
can not overwrite existing copy of 'eagle_5.7.0-2.diff.gz' already in
the archive.
What is the proper procedure for uploading additional binaries to
non-free so it can be available to users and migrate to testing?
Thank you.
Regards,
Scott Howard
Thank you all!
Niels Thykier comment worked, my sponsor has uploaded it!
I think your sponsor should have built it with -B (binary
arch-dependent only).
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
If the license allows it, the package can be whitelisted for building
on
non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/e/eagle/eagle_5.7.0-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Scott Howard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
://packages.qa.debian.org/e/enet.html
it seems to build different binaries than the current Debian package.
Also, it seems from your ITP that you are interested in it. I suggest
checking out the Debian Games Team and chat with them on IRC, they are
very helpful.
Regards,
Scott Howard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
://launchpad.net/sandboxgamemaker-debian
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Scott Howard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Ben, thank you for your comments:
* License : Custom, open-source, I have written permission to
package,
non-free since author is concerned about it
being used to make
commercial games and thus puts some extra
50 matches
Mail list logo
