` for this purpose:
<https://pbuilder-team.pages.debian.net/pbuilder/>
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
ction.
I'm not a Developer or Maintainer (just a user with aspirations at this
point) so I can't help you with sponsorship.
But I'm a FreeCAD user, and have been for several years, and I would be
super happy to see it in Debian. It would be a strong enabler for folks
who into open
this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/dxf2gcode
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dxf2gcode/dxf2gcode_20170925-7.dsc
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
On 02/01/2018 11:13 AM, Juhani Numminen wrote:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Sebastian Kuzminsky kirjoitti 26.01.2018 klo 20:15:
Dear Mentors/Sponsors,
I am looking for a Sponsor for my package "dxf2gcode":
Here's my short review of the package, but I can't sponsor it.
Tha
And here is my RFS (which I should have used the mentors.d.n RFS
template for, but didn't):
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888526
Thanks!
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear Mentors/Sponsors,
I am looking for a Sponsor for my package "dxf2gcode":
https://mentors.debian.net/package/dxf2gcode
It builds a single binary-all package also named dxf2gcode.
More info is available at upstream's wiki here:
https://sour
Hi folks, I've finally updated the cogito package after almost 2 months.
Can someone please upload it for me?
You can grab it here:
http://highlab.com/~seb/debian
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
in/git and removed the Conflict with git.deb.)
But I agree totally with you. I'd much rather conflict with GNU
Interactive Tools and have git-the-vcs be compatible with non-debian
universe. That seems like the lesser of two evils. But everyone else
on debian-devel seems to want it the other wa
issue. It is expected that
Pasky will quit distributing his own version of git with cogito soon,
and then I'll need to package Linus' git for Debian.
Make sense?
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 2005-06-10 23:21:54, schrieb Sebastian Kuzminsky:
> > The new cogito package (0.11.3+20050610-1) is on its way into sid.
> > It does not install /usr/bin/git or /usr/bin/cg, and so it does not
> > conflict with git or wi
Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> >Hi folks, I have a noob question for you. I maintain the Cogito package
> >(my first), and it wants to install an executable as /usr/bin/git. The
> >GNU Interactive Tools package (git) also wants to
programs.
I guess I just prefer getting flamed by the git/cogito people rather
than the Debian people. :-/
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sebastian Kuzminsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm, given that git-from-cogito seems to have a fatal flaw (it doesnt
> shift the script name out of the arguments list), I'm guessing it's
> not widely used. I'll request that the upstream people remove it from
> th
not conflict with GNU Interactive Tools'
git(1) page.)
If they dont agree (and they're a cantankerous bunch, hi to all my
friends on the git list) we'll have to come up with something else...
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to remove it or
rename it.
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e GNU Interactive
Tools git package?
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(when it work); and "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t" (when it
breaks). But I dont think either of those suggest good manpage names. ;)
So. Does git-core(1) seem reasonable?
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
"Marie will know I'm headed south, so's to meet me by and by"
Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 11:44:05PM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> > I've updated the Cogito package to compile against the upstream-included
> > GPL SHA1 implementation lifted from Mozilla, instead of the (possibly)
&g
I've updated the Cogito package to compile against the upstream-included
GPL SHA1 implementation lifted from Mozilla, instead of the (possibly)
GPL-incompatible OpenSSL code. Thanks to Florian Weimer and Anibal
Monsalve Salazar for bringing this issue to my attention. I have a
terrible head for t
Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 12:46:27PM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> > Why does your cogito package Depend on rcs?
>
> Someone tells me that cogito use the 'merge' program from the rcs
> package. So I added this de
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2005 14:05:28 -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> > You can grab the new cogito package here:
> >
> > http://highlab.com/~seb/debian
>
> FYI, you can make the packages and source apt-get'able w/
The upstream now includes docs for the GIT core, though still not for
Cogito. The docs are available in .txt and .html, and they _would_
be available as manpages except for a bug in asciidoc. The asciidoc
maintainer has been offered a patch.
You can grab the new cogito package here:
http:/
Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
] On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:57:56PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
] >The package is GPLed, but depends on OpenSSL, whose license is not
] >GPL-compatible. Please ask upstream for a linking exception, or use
] >some other SHA-1 implementation.
Ah
Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
] On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:22:17AM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
] >I'm looking for a Debian Sponsor to upload this package to the archive.
]
] I'll upload it. However, we'll have to wait until the license issue
]
Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
] On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:22:17AM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
] >I'm also looking to have my GPG key signed (I live in Colorado, USA),
] >and for an Advocate.
]
] What city in Colorado. Maybe there is a DD in the s
cogito_0.10-2 is up, it now puts the internal scripts and the shell
library in /usr/share/cogito instead of /usr/lib/cogito. Thanks to Ben
Finney and Peter Samuelson for cluing me in.
You can get the package here:
http://highlab.com/~seb/debian
The only problem I know of with the package
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
] It could be better described, yes. My understanding of /usr/share as
] "architecture-independent" (and read-only, as the description
] continues) is that /usr/share/can potentially be mounted read-only
] for multiple machines of different architectures.
Ok,
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
] [Sebastian Kuzminsky]
] > Before 0.10, the upstream installed both the binaries (actually shell
] > scripts) and the shell libraries in /usr/bin. Starting with 0.10,
] > the shell libraries are moved to /usr/lib/cogito.
]
] Correct,
Get it here:
http://highlab.com/~seb/debian
Before 0.10, the upstream installed both the binaries (actually shell
scripts) and the shell libraries in /usr/bin. Starting with 0.10, the
shell libraries are moved to /usr/lib/cogito. This seems to me like a
fine thing to do, any reason Debian
Martin Waitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
] On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 09:42:39PM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
] > I think the package is ready for a wider audience. I just updated it
] > to the just-released upstream version 0.9, it's available here:
]
] why do you patch the
Hi folks, I'm a wanna-be new maintainer. With the helpful guidance
of Anibal, I've been working on a Debian package of Cogito. Cogito is
Pasky's distributed revision control system on top of Linus Torvalds'
GIT directory tracker.
I know there's an ITP for Cogito (#304602), I've tried to contact
Hi Vincent, I just looked over your cogito package, comparing it to the
one I have made (they look pretty similar).
Why does your cogito package Depend on rcs?
Your Build-Depends is missing libz-dev, libcurl-dev, and libssl-dev.
And it repeats some dependencies in a strange way - it depends on
I've put up a new version of the cogito package I'm working on (0.8-2)
here:
http://highlab.com/~seb/debian
I added the needed Build-Depends so this version builds with pbuilder
under Sarge.
I still get lintian & linda errors about all the programs missing
manpages. The upstream code is v
Hi folks, I'm a wanna-be new maintainer looking for a sponsor. I've been
using Debian since 0.93 and I've made some little goofy packages for local
use. I finally made a package that others may find useful, of cogito:
http://highlab.com/~seb/debian
It's lintian and linda clean, _except_ fo
35 matches
Mail list logo
