On Monday 15 January 2007 07:37, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 02:14:47AM -0400, Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez
a écrit :
> > Now, I think it's not good to send an email like accusing someone in
> > here nor discrediting the work of the others. It could be fixed and
> > discus
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 19:52, Jari Aalto wrote:
> As to comes to removing "# dh_*" comments we agree to disagree on
> this. I have no problem with
[name omitted]
> considering that a "good
> practice", but I hope that all understad that developers may have
> other views that may be equally v
On Thursday 25 January 2007 15:55, Andreas Moll wrote:
> > Sorry if I missed something obvious, but why not calling it directly
> > from the sources instead of duplicating it in /debian ?
> All right, I will call the script script directly.
And if it is in the upstream source already, then there wi
Dear Changyan (also, please correct/apologize if I address you wrongly),
dear Charles,
this is quite a coincidence.
The SBML libraries have two rather ancient ITPs (#24,#277748) of mine and
Andrea Tasso. Just last week I got a patch to my diff.gz. thus bringing it
up to the latest level,
se the acceptance of Debian in
biological labs.
> 2007/1/29, Steffen Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
> > Dear Moriyoshi and dear Changyan, please get in contact with each other
> > for an exchange of ideas for the package. Whoever wishes to go forward
> > with the
I could go for it, but since I am very much too busy and a vi user I would
appreciate someone else to jump in. I very much like Prolog, though. Cheers,
Steffen
On Wednesday 29 August 2007 20:51, Philipp Benner wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.14-1
> of
Hi Jan,
I am basically off for the next two weeks but volunteer to sponsor you when I
return at the end of this month - should you not have found someone else.
Please consider to join the Debian-Med folks at
http://www.us.debian.org/devel/debian-med/
there may be someone available earlier than
Hi Peter,
I can go for it unless you have found someone else already.
Cheers,
Steffen
On Friday 05 October 2007 18:45:46 Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.6.0-1
> of my package "dot2tex".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> dot2te
Hello,
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 03:27:16PM +0800, Chen Tse Tsai a écrit :
>> Dear mentors
>> I am looking for sponsorship for my package 'libsvm'.
>> It closes the bug #517447. I intend to adopt it since
>> I am from the group developing libsvm and we are very
>> willing to
Hello,
Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> I downloaded lenny and m on a lenny system
the package should be build on unstable. To have lenny underneath is fine, but
then
install a chroot environment that is sid. You should also become familiar with
pbuilder.
> now and will use quilt patch
using quilt
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2009-09-06, Rogério Brito wrote:
>>> - I doubt that many sponsors will be happy DM-Upload-Allowed: yes
>>>on a NEW package.
>> While I understand that you mentioned this regarding a NEW package, I'm
>> a slightly bit confused about the "best current practices"
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 12:58:59PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>> How about DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS? This needs dpkg 1.15.4, though.
>> Sorry, that should have been DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS.
>
> Cool, the version in unstable is the key.
This is nice, indeed.
$ dpkg-architecture -qD
Johannes Ring wrote:
>...
> The package can be found on packages.simula.no:
> - URL: http://packages.simula.no/pool/main/s/swiginac/
> - Source repository: deb-src http://packages.simula.no/ unstable main
> - dget http://packages.simula.no/pool/main/s/swiginac/swiginac_1.5.1-2.dsc
> or
> - svn+ssh:
Hi Stefano,
Stefano Canepa wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.7.15-1
> of my package "gsoap".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> gsoap - SOAP stub and skeleton compiler for C and C++
>
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> The package can be found on me
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
in a program I am packaging, a copy of the source of libtiff, libpng and
libjpeg is included (and was originally linked statically). In the
Debian package, I use the respective Debian libraries, linking
dynamically, and these directories are unused.
Should I delete these from
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
in a program I am packaging, a copy of the source of libtiff, libpng and
libjpeg is included (and was originally linked statically). In the
Debian package, I use the respective Debian libraries, linking
dynamically, and these directories are unused.
Should I delete these f
16 matches
Mail list logo
