retitle 911072 RFS: batctl/2018.4-2~bpo9+1 [BPO]
thanks
On Monday, 15 October 2018 12:41:22 CET Sven Eckelmann wrote:
[...]
> I am looking for a sponsor for my backport of package "batctl" for
> stretch-backports. It is required to use the netlink batadv commands
> which w
retitle 911072 RFS: batctl/2018.4-1~bpo9+1 [BPO]
thanks
On Monday, 15 October 2018 12:41:22 CET Sven Eckelmann wrote:
[...]
> I am looking for a sponsor for my backport of package "batctl" for
> stretch-backports. It is required to use the netlink batadv commands
> which w
On Tuesday, 30 October 2018 16:30:23 CET Bart Martens wrote:
> retitle 911072 RFS: batctl/2018.3-1~bpo8+1 [BPO]
> stop
>
> I see that the package at mentors has version 2018.3-1~bpo8+1
> so I retitle the RFS to match that version.
This was wrong. The version on mentors was 2018.3-1~bpo9+1 (like y
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:41:15 +0200 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my backport of package "batctl" for
> jessie-backports-sloppy. It is required to use the netlin
changelog can be found at
https://git.open-mesh.org/batctl.git/blob/HEAD:/CHANGELOG.rst (or in the
package under /usr/share/doc/batctl/changelog.gz)
Regards,
Sven Eckelmann
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
backports; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for jessie-backports.
.
batctl (2018.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New Upstream Version
The full upstream changelog can be found at
https://git.open-mesh.org/batctl.git/blob/HEAD:/CHANGELOG.rst (or in the
package under /usr/share/doc/batctl/changelog.g
ed manpage-hyphen-used-as-minus-sign.patch
Regards,
Sven Eckelmann
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
deo-glide64mk2
This package closes WNPP ITP bug #714994. I am only a Debian Maintainer and
therefore need a sponsor to include this module/plugin of mupen64plus in
Debian.
Regards,
Sven Eckelmann
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Saturday 01 June 2013 11:01:41 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> * Package name: exactimage
>Version : 0.8.8-2
Was uploaded to unstable
http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/exactimage/news/20130601T214824Z.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Closes: #708417)
- Switch from libtiff-dev provided by oldlib libtiff4-dev to libtiff5-dev
Regards,
Sven Eckelmann
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
> * Package name: exactimage
> Version : 0.8.8-1
Was uploaded to unstable
http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/exactimage/news/20130506T070300Z.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sunday 05 May 2013 18:16:26 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Do you need a sponsor ?
Yes, I am searching for a sponsor:
> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
[...]
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "exactimage"
I am a Debian Maintainer, but my o
y, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/exactimage/exactimage_0.8.8-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
exactimage (0.8.8-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Sven Eckelmann ]
* New Upstream Version
* debian/control:
- Re
e (0.8.5-5) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control:
- Add Daniel Stender and Sven Eckelmann as new maintainer (Closes: #587062)
- Depend on libpng-dev instead of libpng12-dev (Closes: #662317)
- Depend on libjpeg8-dev to avoid hiccups with other libjpeg versions
* debian/patches
reopen 670704
thanks
Sry, send the -done mail to the wrong bug.
Kind regards,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
was created because ~75% (compressed ~600 KiB,
uncompressed ~3000 KiB) were just architecture independent files.
Regards,
Sven Eckelmann
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
s
These changes are only the cleanup changes of 2 1/2 years.
I am a Debian Maintainer, but the package doesn't have
"Dm-Upload-Allowed: yes" set.
Regards,
Sven Eckelmann
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Saturday 22 January 2011 11:32:39 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version of mupen64plus. This version
> was splitted in different source package because the source bundle archive
> isn't dfsg compliant and doesn't co
e glad if someone uploaded these packages for me.
Kind regards
Sven Eckelmann
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
urce repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mupen64plus-video-z64/mupen64plus-video-z64_1.99.4~hg20100403-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded these packages for me.
Kind regards
Sve
://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mupen64plus-video-z64/mupen64plus-video-z64_1.99.4~hg20100403-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded these packages for me.
Kind regards
Sven Eckelmann
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
t
+- Upgraded to policy 3.8.4, no changes required
+ * Correct spelling errors found by lintian
+ * debian/copyright: Update copyright years
+ * Check all files ever published on the download page in debian/watch
+
+ -- Sven Eckelmann Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:22:03 +0100
+
mupen64plus (1
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> Thanks for your contribution to Debian!
>
> On Freitag, 27. November 2009, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "g3dviewer".
>
> Uploaded.
Thanks for the fast upload.
> Could you please a
ebian/pool/main/g/g3dviewer
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/g3dviewer/g3dviewer_0.2.99.5~svn130-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Sven Eckel
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:33:01 -0700 Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> > a good reason to disable that patch right now. Maybe there is a little bit
> > confusion about lzma/lzma-dev/liblzma/libxz/7z.
>
> when 111-system-unlzma.patch is enabled, I'm getting segmentation fault
> every time I try to start the
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 05:13:31 -0700 Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> > > * can you do with lzma something similar to you did with bz2 and zlib?
> > No, not at the moment. The lzma-dev doesn't provide a shared object. I
> > changed
> > it now to link against the static libraries from lzma-dev instead of the
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:22:21 -0700 Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> * Please remove Dm-Upload-Allowed, I don't know you guys and even if I
> would, I'd most probably not upload a NEW package with this flag.
If it is your opinion then I will change that.
> Please remind me that one of you has DM status
y a mentor until it hits the debian archive.
All following uploads can be done by myself.
Best regards,
Sven Eckelmann
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2009/06/msg2.html
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/03/msg00043.html
[3] http://bugs.debian.org/513322#5
he mailing list at the moment. I will
read the archives with answers to this mail, but maybe miss answers not
referencing this mail otherwise.
This package uses the new debug sections for the -dbg package and thus create
lintian warnings with the lintian in the unstable repositories.
Kind reg
ovides binaries
and script binding when it got packaged.
The other changes will be added to my repository but I will not upload them to
mentors anymore.
Best regards,
Sven Eckelmann
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 13:23:36 Michal Čihař wrote:
> Hi
Thx for your response
> Dne Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:13:22 +0100
>
> Sven Eckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
> > It builds these binary packages:
> > bardecode - command-line barcode decoder
> >
e_0.6.7-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Sven Eckelmann
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thursday 16 October 2008 16:01:06 Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> [...]
>
> could be in main? (so is dfsg)
>
> I think that yes, but I must admit that the legal stuff is something
> unclear to me. Something as the classical licenses are clear, but this
> custom makes me crazy.
This isn't cust
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cuneiform/cuneiform_0.4.dfsg.1-3.dsc
Kind regards
Sven Eckelmann
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:19:02 +0200
Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I noticed that meanwhile, but I think that RFS should contain correct
> URL (same applies to second RFS from Sven Eckelmann).
Sry for that. I got a suggestion from someone else and updated the package.
> Any
e_0.6.3-2.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Sven Eckelmann
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cuneiform
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cuneiform/cuneiform_0.4.dfsg.1-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Ki
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "s3d".
* Package name: s3d
Version : 0.2.1-1
Upstream Author : Sven Eckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Simon Wunderlich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://s3d.berlios.de/
* License
38 matches
Mail list logo
