ase in debian/copyright (Upstream-contact ⇒
Upstream-Contact).
.
[ Sven Joachim ]
* New upstream snapshot.
- Fixes FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
(Closes: #1066469).
* Update debian/watch to version 4, and look for tarballs on
https://invisible
On 2023-09-09 09:17 +0200, Lorenzo wrote:
> I want to build a package to upload to stable, but I get a lintian Error
> E: runit-services changes: bad-distribution-in-changes-file bookworm
>
> I'm doing the following steps
>
> 1. generate the changelog entry with
> $ dch --stable
> https://salsa.de
On 2023-03-20 00:37 -0400, M. Zhou wrote:
> I'm trying to build the cuda version of pytorch. It depends on a non-free
> library libcudnn.so.8 which
> is downloaded during postinst by bin:nvidia-cudnn. It is provided by a
> downloader script due to
> some problems in the upstream EULA.
>
> During
On 2021-02-22 09:09 -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:33 AM Tong Sun wrote:
>>
>> > Can I use rm_conffile to remove a (conffile) directory?
>> >
>> > I checked the man page but am still not too sure about that.
>
> I am still not too sure about the above yet.
If you want to rem
On 2021-01-03 09:02 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I have recently split the mime-support package in two: media-types and
> mailcap. But I wonder if I handled the conffiles correctly.
>
> mime-support had the conffiles `/etc/mime.types` and
> `/etc/mailcap.order` until version 3.64. Version 3.65
On 2020-08-03 09:55 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> [cc me please]
>
> Hi there,
>
> Does anyone understand the following non-fatal error:
>
> [...]
> /<>/pixelmed_20200416-2_all-buildd.changes.new could not be
> renamed to /<>/pixelmed_20200416-2_all-buildd.changes:
> Illegal seek
> Distributio
On 2019-10-30 22:27 -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
> As it turns out, there was mail from Colin Watson sitting in my spam folder
> that explained the situation as a dh_installman bug [4]. Colin, you
> describe this as a man-recode problem but your description actually makes
> it sound like a bug
On 2019-08-11 09:31 -0700, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> I'd like a metapackage that'd pull in all automatic dbgsyms from one source
> package. But I don't see any way to accomplish this. Is this possible?
You can of course create such a metapackage, but it becomes out of date
when the list of binar
On 2019-08-06 16:45 +0200, Jens Reyer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> is there a way for two different, arch-specific packages (from the same
> source package) to share an identical file (script)?
Yes, provided one of these two packages diverts the other one's file,
see dpkg-divert(1). This is usually done
On 2019-07-17 19:06 +0200, François Mazen wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I'm trying to add auto-pkg-tests to the flightcrew package with CI on
> Salsa repo.
>
> When I launch the flightcrew-gui binary via autopkgtest, I got the
> following error on Salsa CI [1]:
>
> "flightcrew-gui: cannot connect to
On 2019-07-15 14:44 +0200, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> when upgrading gmsh to 4.4.0, I'm getting the build error
> ```
> [...]
> dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot find library libgmsh.so.4.4 needed by
> debian/gmsh/usr/bin/gmsh (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64' abi:
> '0201003e'; RPATH:
On 2019-07-15 08:35 +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> I have a larger package (eso-midas) that built successfully over the
> last years. However, a new binNMU failed last night on
> mips/mipsel/mips64 with the cryptic error message
>
>dh_dwz -a
> dh_dwz: dwz -q
> -mdebian/eso-midas/usr/lib/debug/.
On 2019-06-22 12:20 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can someone please tell me a source about the meaning of :native in the
> Build-Depends?
The architecture you are building on, see deb-src-control(5):
,
| An architecture qualifier name can be a real Debian architecture name
|
Disclaimer: I am not a DD and cannot sponsor your package.
On 2018-01-21 15:01 +0800, Yangfl wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pcc"
>
> * Package name: pcc
>Version : 1.2.0~DEVEL+20180120-1
On 2017-10-05 21:00 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I migrated the Debian packaging of tifffile from SVN to Git[1]. After
> upgrading to the latest upstream version (dated 2017-09-14) I get:
>
> ...
> x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -pthread -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O2 -Wall
> -Wstrict-prototypes -fno-strict-ali
On 2017-09-23 10:54 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for an NMU of the "tack" package,
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tack.
>
> This is a new upstream version fixing an FTBFS bug
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
I am looking for a sponsor for an NMU of the "tack" package,
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tack.
This is a new upstream version fixing an FTBFS bug with current
ncurses[1] and a segfault problem[2]. In addition to that, I have fixed
the debian/w
On 2016-07-31 18:05 +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> I am changing the rules of the package amanda to debhelper 9 and I am
> stopped in a problem with dh_installman. I have checked what I know
> and everything is correct. But still I think that is something
> obvious that I am missing. Possibly
On 2016-07-13 01:35 +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> Some time ago I made gdbm_1.12-3 into experimental, and since it is
> incompatible with
> gdbm-1.8 (new soname, separated compat library) I rebuilt all reverse
> depedencies.
> Here is my report:
>
> FAIL camldbm_1.0-2.dsc | PATCH
>
On 2016-07-08 23:53 +0200, Christian Seiler wrote:
> If I may piggy-back off here: what's the best way to achieve that if
> this crosses binary-package boundaries?
>
> While packaging open-isns [1], I had the following problem: upstream
> ships a man page isns_config.5, which covers isnsadm.conf.5
On 2016-06-25 05:24 +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>> On 2016-06-24 00:19 -0400, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>>
>> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gdbm"
>> >
>> > Changes since last upload:
>> >
>> > * Separate translation files (/usr/share/locale/*) into new binary
>> > package 'libgd
On 2016-06-24 00:19 -0400, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gdbm"
>
> Changes since last upload:
>
> * Separate translation files (/usr/share/locale/*) into new binary
> package 'libgdbm-l10n' to comply with Policy §8.2 (Closes: #828005)
Thanks for the fast
Hi Dmitry,
I am not a DD and thus cannot sponsor your package, but here are a few
remarks.
On 2016-06-11 11:17 -0400, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gdbm"
Thanks for taking care of it!
> Changes since last upload:
Your debian/changelog file is actually miss
On 2014-10-22 08:20 +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
>
>> Does it makes sense for a package to conflict with itself?
>
> Not really, especially since there is no multi-arch header. You might
> want to file a bug report about this. It would
On 2014-09-27 17:49 +0200, Bamm wrote:
> I could not use the wildcards bin/*/* usr/bin because the tarball
> contains binary blobs of the same filename. I want the correct file to
> be installed depending on whether an i386 or amd64 package is being
> built.
You can use debian/install.$arch to di
On 2014-09-06 16:52 +0200, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> I am packaging gnome-shell-pomodoro-data and found out that piuparts
> fails testing it because at some point, it wants to install
> sysvinit-core so removes systemd-sysv.
>
> The first question is WHY?! I don't understand what dependency makes
>
On 2014-08-18 09:46 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Ole,
>
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 01:31:40PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
>>
>> And, the question remains: how do I effectively shall maintain such a
>> package without burding a heavy load to my sponsor and possibly to other
>> people (porters)?
On 2014-08-15 17:50 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> The warning seems to be red herring, maybe the tool scanning the build
> logs needs to be adapted for dpkg-dev 1.17.11 which changed the default
> CFLAGS, replacing -fstack-protector with -fstack-protector-strong.
For the record, that wou
On 2014-08-15 16:11 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> I maintain linuxinfo and now I get an "issue"[1] that the hardening
> flags appear to be missing.
>
> In the build logs I see some, and I expected my debian/rules to pick
> everything up (since I use dh):
> #!/usr/bin/make -f
>
> %:
> dh
On 2014-05-31 20:35 +0200, Paul Elliott wrote:
> This may be the wrong list, but I am not sure what the right list is.
The debian-user list suggests itself.
> When I package, I like to run unstable to see if the packages work.
>
> This is becomming difficult because my video interface built
> in
On 2014-02-14 13:52 +0100, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
> After some inquiry, I can see that it can build only on amd64, i386,
> kfreebsd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64 and hud-i386, because the lib it depends on
> (libx86) is only present there. On other architectures I could build only
> one of the binarie
On 2014-02-14 09:38 +0100, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "read-edid"
Have you tried to contact the DD who sponsored the 3.0.1-1 upload yet?
> Changes since the last upload:
>
>
On 2013-09-17 21:42 +0200, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> On 17/09/13 19:36, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> That would be the best, I think.
>
> Thank you for your assistance Sven.
Note that I'm not a DD and cannot sponsor your package.
> I have now uploaded the package to mentors agai
On 2013-09-17 20:24 +0200, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> On 17/09/13 18:50, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Looks like you used different .orig.tar.gz tarballs for 0.4b2-1
>> and 0.4b2-2.
>
> Ah... I had recreated the git repository to follow the git workflow
> outlined on the Debian
On 2013-09-17 16:58 +0200, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> I updated one of my packages on mentors earlier and wanted to clarify
> whether each upload increment the build number? (For example 0.4b2-1
> would become 0.4b2-2)
Sponsors have different requirements, but most of them would rather not
want you
On 2013-08-19 11:31 +0200, Fabien Givors (Debian) wrote:
> I had a look to eglibc source package. I can tell some dark magic is at
> work in this package. But as I need only a small fragment of it, I'll
> probably be able to extract it.
It would probably be easier to look at a simpler package suc
On 2013-05-11 20:35 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I am fairly sure Lintian emits that tag based on a static data file.
Oh, libmpich-dev is indeed listed in
/usr/share/lintian/vendors/debian/ftp-master-auto-reject/data/fields/virtual-packages.
Thanks,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
On 2013-05-11 20:17 +0200, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
> On 11/05/13 20:10, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2013-05-11 19:50 +0200, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
>>
>>> Does anyone know why lintian would think that libmpich-dev, which is a
>>> new package that
On 2013-05-11 19:50 +0200, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
> I'm working on a new version of the mpich2 packages. It is being
> renamed to mpich, so I have introduced some transitional packages.
>
> For example, the current package called libmpich2-dev will be replaced
> with the new package lib
On 2013-03-10 21:09 +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> On 10/03/13 20:17, Antonio Valentino wrote:
>>
>> Il 10/03/2013 19:59, Sven Joachim ha scritto:
>>>
>>> A valid possibility would be to reverse the roles and dependencies:
>>> rename polsarpro to polsarpro
On 2013-03-10 19:26 +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> On 10/03/13 18:48, Antonio Valentino wrote:
>> Configuration item 'binary:polsarpro Depends:2' has a wrong value:
>> dependency 'polsarpro-bin (<< ${source:Version}.1~)' does not match grammar
>>
>>
>> Should I care about it?
> Not about the "unknow
On 2013-03-09 18:15 +0100, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> Alfonso Sabato Siciliano writes:
>> I am making a package, the original Makefile has not install rule so
>> it install anything then I have to add it.
>> Where must I install this rule?
>> -Patching original Makefile
>
> A good solution if
[ CC'ing ia32-libs maintainers for their opinion. ]
On 2012-07-01 16:04 +0200, Gregor Jasny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> currently my source package v4l-utils builds lib32v4l-0 and
> lib32v4l-dev packages on amd64. I'd like to get rid of them sooner
> than later and provide a proper upgrade path to multia
On 2012-05-13 00:50 +0200, Jon Dowland wrote:
> I'm trying to package 'lhasa' but I'm having some trouble. There is a binary
> package 'lhasa' shipping a binary which depends on a library from a library
> package 'liblhasa0', all from the same source. (analogous to curl depending
> on libcurlX fro
On 2012-05-10 20:06 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 10-05-12 01:22, Ben Finney wrote:
>> Policy dictates, and ‘dpkg’ obeys, that this change is not respected.
>> The result is that the existing directory remains, and is no longer
>> populated in the new release.
>>
>>
>> The package installs a du
On 2012-03-02 10:43 +0100, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> Also
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Nov 13 2010 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 ->
>> /lib32/ld-linux.so.2
>> and
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Nov 13 2010 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 ->
>> /lib/i486-linux-gnu/ld-linux.so.
On 2011-11-09 12:01 +0100, Björn Esser wrote:
> What shall I do, when there's already a debian-dir inside the .orig.tar,
> e.g. when upstream already package his/her program for ubuntu?
Replace the debian/ directory with your own version.
> Can I safely remove the existing debian-dir from the .o
On 2011-10-30 19:59 +0100, Daniel Stender wrote:
> The developer's have marked the current beta of Gummi 0.6 (split-panel
> LaTeX editor) as 0.5.999, though not officially presented but
> available as svn snapshots.
>
> Question: Me as maintainer I would like to support the development of
> Gummi,
On 2011-10-17 15:23 +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> I'm having a small issue and I'm not exactly sure whether it's a bug or
> I'm misunderstanding the documentation.
>
> I'm packaging tivoli-tsm (an i386-only closed-source application) for
> internal use. It used to work fine depending on ia32-li
On 2011-09-24 10:16 +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> If a symbol is removed in a later version
> (and the soname is not bumped, due to a mistake), the above method will
> result in a library that, when installed, will break any app using the
> old, removed symbol.
Erm, this will also happen if you do
On 2011-08-22 11:54 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Paul Elliott writes:
>>
>> Does this mean that if my library has an include reference
>> #include
>> in one of its .c or .h files, then my -dev package must have a depends line
>> like this in its debian/control file:
>
> You need that for p
On 2011-08-21 08:33 +0200, Javier Sancho wrote:
> There is no limitation. Users can install non-free plugins if they
> want. They can go to Firefox website and download them. The only
> difference is that Gnu IceCat don't provide these non-free plugins at
> its add-ons manager and then, users know
On 2011-07-30 19:58 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:35:40 +0300, "Eugene V. Lyubimkin"
> wrote:
>> One minor detail (for the next upload) I didn't notice before: there is
>> no substitution variable '{misc:Pre-Depends}', so you can remove that
>> Pre-Depends line of libbs2b0 a
On 2011-07-10 20:55 +0200, Bob Proulx wrote:
> I am hoping to understand the "obsolete" flag on conffiles in the dpkg
> status file. There are many packages that include this flag at the
> end of the line. For example:
>
> Package: file
> Conffiles:
> /etc/magic.mime 272913026300e7ae9b5e2d51f13
On 2011-07-09 10:20 +0200, Reijo Tomperi wrote:
> We could have a service where we submit the package. That service will
> then run some checks for it. E.g.
> - building the package
Automatically running code from random people sounds rather risky to me.
> - lintian check.
> - install & uninstal
On 2011-06-13 12:11 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Sven Joachim writes:
>
>> On 2011-06-11 09:22 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>
>>> Except for how dpkg behaves. If your package has a file in /usr/lib64/
>>> and gets installed then dpkg records
On 2011-06-11 09:22 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Except for how dpkg behaves. If your package has a file in /usr/lib64/
> and gets installed then dpkg records that that directory belongs to your
> package. Then the next time libc6 gets updated dpkg will try to unpack
> the /usr/lib64 symli
On 2011-06-09 11:19 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 10:00:40AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> The problem is that libdl.so has been moved to the multiarch paths in
>> libc6-dev 2.13-5. You must upgrade cmake to 2.8.4+dfsg.1-3, have you
>>
On 2011-06-09 08:11 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:28:52PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:26:22AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> > make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so', needed by
>> > `src/cadxcore/libCADxCore.so.2.4.1.1'. S
On 2011-06-07 09:03 +0200, Johannes Storm wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 07.06.2011, 11:02 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Johannes Storm
> wrote:
>>
>> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "brainparty".
>> ...
>> > Section : contrib/x11
>>
>> That should
On 2011-05-24 11:09 +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> On 05/24/2011 10:43 AM, Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos wrote:
>> $ssh eftaxiop-gu...@git.debian.org
>>
>> I get the same rejection.
> The same here. The public key is rejected and no password asked (run
> with -v).
> I presume the folks are aware of it a
On 2011-04-08 16:18 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Does anyone knows where /usr/include/linux/videodev.h has gone ? It
> has disappear from the latest linux-libc-dev package in sid.
It has been removed in Linux 2.6.38 (commit
88ae7624a6fe890e5a8ca57b25420f66e1389f8b in Linus' tree).
Sven
On 2011-02-23 19:54 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 02/23/11 17:06, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2011-02-23 16:39 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sorry, I got confused myself. That should have read
>> xserver-driver-video, not xserver-xorg-video.
>>
On 2011-02-23 16:39 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 02/22/11 23:29, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2011-02-22 23:08 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/22/11 21:29, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Are you using xsfbs? If so, this is probably beca
On 2011-02-22 23:08 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 02/22/11 21:29, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> Are you using xsfbs? If so, this is probably because the
>> /usr/share/xserver-xorg/videoabiver file is gone.
>>
>>> instead of
>>>
>>> xs
On 2011-02-22 20:47 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am running my own NVidia graphics package. Problem: After the most
> recent upgrade of xorg the "${xviddriver:Provides}" macro in the
> "Provides:" line expands to
>
> xserver-xorg-video-
Are you using xsfbs? If so, this is
On 2011-02-15 22:24 +0100, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 February 2011 15:16:27 Tony Houghton wrote:
>> How about I file a wishlist bug for dpkg and apt for an option similar
>> to purge but which only purges files which haven't been altered from the
>> package's default?
>
> From
On 2011-01-27 14:20 +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> torsdag den 27 januari 2011 klockan 10:45 skrev Sven Joachim detta:
>> On 2011-01-27 00:11 +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
>>
>> > onsdag den 26 januari 2011 klockan 16:59 skrev Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
>> >
On 2011-01-27 00:11 +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> onsdag den 26 januari 2011 klockan 16:59 skrev Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. detta:
>>
>> How are you calling update-rc.d? These warning messages indicate to me that
>> update-rc.d is complaining that you've asked it to install S* links in
>> rc
On 2011-01-27 10:03 +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> onsdag den 26 januari 2011 klockan 16:06 skrev Russ Allbery detta:
>> Mats Erik Andersson writes:
>>
>> > However, update-rc.d disagrees vividly with me (and possibly
>> > also insserv), since it prefers to call aloud
>>
>> >update-rc.
On 2011-01-25 17:43 +0100, Michael wrote:
> I want to get rid of
>
> W: libsnacc0c2: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libasn1c++0
> libasn1cCebuf0 libasn1cebuf0 libasn1cmbuf0 libasn1csbuf0 libasn1ctbl0
>
> I didn't do the naming, but it's true, what lintian is saying.
Looks like the package got
On 2011-01-13 09:38 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 01:39:05PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> >> at compile time. Upstream said I need to set ARCH_64=1 if the
>> >> architecture has 64 bit *pointers* (they sa
On 2011-01-12 13:34 +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 01:19:18PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hello,
>
>> I try to build a package which needs information about the architecture
>> at compile time. Upstream said I need to set ARCH_64=1 if the
>> architecture has
On 2010-12-20 17:27 +0100, Roger Light wrote:
> Should the library -dev package names have the SO version number in or
> not? In other words, should libmosquitto0-dev actually be
> libmosquitto-dev? I've seen packages both with and without an SO
> version.
Usually it is better to omit the soname
Am 05.12.2010 um 19:52 schrieb Harald Dunkel:
> On 12/05/10 13:37, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Am 05.12.2010 um 12:05 schrieb Harald Dunkel:
>>
>>> Doesn't this mean that no other
>>> packages providing libgl1 can be installed,
>>
>> Not along l
Am 05.12.2010 um 12:05 schrieb Harald Dunkel:
> I found this in debian/control for libgl1-mesa-glx:
>
> :
> Conflicts: libgl1, libgl1-mesa-dri (<< 6.4.0)
> Replaces: libgl1, libgl1-mesa-dri (<< 6.4.0)
> Provides: libgl1
> :
>
> This looks weird to me. How can it repla
On 2010-10-13 05:07 +0200, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> I am pretty sure this is a very trivial issue. But googling for the error
> returns lot of hits none of which I find useful.
>
> I packaged a small program called lapack95. I uploaded the files to
> sourceforge website after signing them
On 2010-10-05 17:17 +0200, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> i would like to create a man page for vavoom, based on a wiki page
> licensed as GNU Free Documentation License 1.2.
> What can i do? GFDL is not free for debian, and my pkg is for main.
GFDL without invariant sections is fine for
On 2010-09-18 14:27 +0200, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
> Hello mentors:
>
> I have some problems with lintian overrides. My package show these:
>
> -
> lintian -I -E --pedantic kstars-data-extra-tycho2_1.1r1-1_all.deb
> I: kstars-data-extra-tycho2: unused-debconf-template kstars-data-
> extr
On 2010-08-31 09:42 +0200, Praveen A wrote:
> 2010/8/31 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. :
>> I thought the patent encumbered software was banned from the repos due to
>> legal risk to SPI. I get my ffmpeg and mp3 stuff from the debian-multimedia
>> repositories which, while good, are not official.
>
> apt
On 2010-05-30 19:31 +0200, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> Le dimanche 30 mai 2010, Sven Joachim a écrit :
>> On 2010-05-30 19:03 +0200, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
>> > Le dimanche 30 mai 2010, Sven Joachim a écrit :
>> >> I think the autojump.* files should not have shebang li
On 2010-05-30 19:03 +0200, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> Le dimanche 30 mai 2010, Sven Joachim a écrit :
>> I think the autojump.* files should not have shebang lines, because it
>> would be rather pointless to run them directly. If you remove the
>> shebang lines and make the
On 2010-05-30 18:19 +0200, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> The second one, missing-dep-for-interpreter, is about a Zsh script
> (autojump providing a Zsh extension, this is expected) and the following
> dependency set:
> Depends: ${misc:Depends}, python, ${python:Depends}, bash (>= 4.0) | zsh
> You wil
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.9-2
of my package "backup-manager".
It builds these binary packages:
backup-manager - command-line backup tool
backup-manager-doc - documentation package for Backup Manager
Apart from one overridden warning, the package appears to
On 2010-03-02 11:14 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:10:59 +0100, Gregor Jasny wrote:
>
>> To be consistent with upstream I changes the package source name to
>> v4l-utils.
>> But what actions do I have to take to take to replace libv4l with
>> v4l-utils in the archive?
>
>
On 2010-02-23 11:39 +0100, Vedran Furač wrote:
> On 21.02.2010 00:03, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>
>> * Vedran Furač , 2010-02-20, 18:52:
>>> Dear mentors,
>>>
>>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "logkeys". I would also note
>>> that I'm familiar with this process as, for some years now, I alread
On 2010-02-11 08:22 +0100, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> For now, I've taken a look at your package. It seems to not build
> properly in a sid pbuilder; can you try that? I'm happy to help you
> set up a pbuilder of your own so you can find these issues quickly.
FWIW, it built fine under pbuilder here,
On 2010-02-09 09:42 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2010-02-08 15:43 +0100, Charles Plessy wrote:
>>
>>> Le Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 02:28:38PM +0100, Sven Joachim a écrit :
>>>> On 2010-02-
On 2010-02-08 15:43 +0100, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 02:28:38PM +0100, Sven Joachim a écrit :
>> On 2010-02-08 14:25 +0100, Charles Plessy wrote:
>>
>> > libjpeg8-dev does not provide libjpeg-dev…
>>
>> The latest version (8-2) does.
On 2010-02-08 14:25 +0100, Charles Plessy wrote:
> libjpeg8-dev does not provide libjpeg-dev…
The latest version (8-2) does.
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 2010-02-08 14:17 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> This is weird. I think this may be caused by libvtk-java:
>
> $ apt-cache depends libvtk-java | grep jpeg
> Depends: libjpeg62
>
> However the Build-Dep seems alright:
>
> http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/debianonly/view/vtk/5.4.2-4
>
>
On 2010-02-08 12:35 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> I am trying to use pbuilder but it keeps failing with this error:
>
>
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> liblzma1{u}
> The following partially installed packages will be configured:
> pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy
> 0 packages up
On 2009-11-11 16:43 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
> TANIGUCHI Takaki schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am maintainer of darcsum package.
>>
>> It works on
>> * emacs21 + gnus
>> * emacs22
>> * emacs23
>> * xmacs21
>>
>> I can't find how to write Depends field. I want to write such as
>> "Depends:
On 2009-09-26 23:05 +0200, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> however you shouldn't need to do "dh_auto_install -- DESTDIR=$(BUILDDIR)
> PREFIX=/usr"
> "dh_auto_install" passes those by default.
This is true for DESTDIR (thanks for the hint), but not for PREFIX,
dh_auto_install only passes PREFIX=/usr to Make
Hello Ryan,
thanks for your review.
On 2009-09-25 08:14 +0200, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> I wouldn't include the authors in the long description, as that's kind
> of boring/useless information for the user. also, the short
> descriptions should follow the guidelines in devref, please read this
> page
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0.3-1 of the package
"ne", which is currently orphaned (see #547225¹).
It builds these binary packages:
ne - Nice Editor, an easy-to-use and powerful editor
ne-doc - Documentation for NE, the Nice Editor
Long description
+recommended by Policy §4.14.
+ * Build with dh to minimize debian/rules.
+ * Bump Standards-Version to 3.8.3, no further changes needed.
+ * Add Vcs-Browser and Vcs-Git fields to debian/control.
+
+ -- Sven Joachim Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:51:27 +0200
+
symlinks (1.2-5) unstable; urgency=low
On 2009-09-08 06:05 +0200, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2009-09-07 12:54 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>>> How about DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS? This needs dpkg 1.15.4, though.
>>
>> Sorry, that should have been DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS.
>
&
On 2009-09-07 12:54 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> How about DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS? This needs dpkg 1.15.4, though.
Sorry, that should have been DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS.
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
On 2009-09-07 12:32 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the new version of arb I want to package requires to set a variable
>
>ARB_64=0/11=>compile 64 bit version
>
> to specify whether it will be compiled on 32 or 64 bit architecture. Is
> there any safe way to set this variabl
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
