Hello mentors!
I have a new ccontrol package ready for upload. Once again it is a minor
change from the last version:
* Force-disable GCC stack protection as it is incompatible with the
current dietlibc (Ubuntu #109157).
* Don't ignore errors in $(MAKE) distclean.
The first change will
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.1+20071204-1
of my package "ccontrol". My previous sponsor (Amaya) is currently AFK.
It builds this binary package:
ccontrol - Compilation controller
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix bug 447832.
The package can be
Patrick Winnertz wrote:
Okay, here are several things to fix:
[...]
Thanks, I have addressed them all.
Source package:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/ccontrol/ccontrol_0.9.1+20071204-2.dsc
Change history: http://tedp.id.au/gitweb/?p=ccontrol-debian.git;a=shortlog
--
\0
--
To
Ek Zindagoi wrote:
> I would like to build rpms on a debian system for use on a redhat
> system. Can I do that on a debian system ?
>
> Even if I wanted to install the RPM on a debain system, can I run the
> rpmbuild -bb command on a debian system and successfully build an RPM
You can certainly
Paul Wise wrote:
> * debian/changelog: the version should be 0.0.20051212 or
> 0.0.0.20051212 or something so that if upstream changes their
> version scheme, you won't have to use [an] epoch.
Isn't that exactly what the epoch is for?
-T
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Here are two users' checklists that I have used for reference.
http://people.debian.org/~neilm/sponsorship.html
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/sponsorship_checklist.html
-Ted
Panu Kalliokoski wrote:
> I wonder, whether there is a list of these "common gotchas" in packaging
> somewhere, or a c
I guess the package name should be 'liblttoolbox1' or similar (no
separator between package name and major soname version).
I'm a packaging newbie so could well be wrong about this.
-Ted
Francis Tyers wrote:
> There is one
> warning from lintian that I can't quite figure out how to fix. "W:
>
st contains:
deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free
Thanks for your consideration.
-Ted Percival
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I've just uploaded version 1.10-2 of fetchexc which uses dpatch to patch
the build.xml file rather than doing it directly through the .diff.gz,
and also adds upstream's changelog.gz which I generated from the
upstream website (aka the README.html file in the package).
I seem to remember seeing som
Ted Percival wrote:
> I've just uploaded version 1.10-2 of fetchexc which uses dpatch to patch
> the build.xml file rather than doing it directly through the .diff.gz,
> and also adds upstream's changelog.gz which I generated from the
> upstream website (aka the README.ht
ources.list contains:
deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free
Thanks for your consideration.
-Ted Percival
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Frederic Lehobey wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my source package "qrfcview".
>
> The package is linda and lintian clean and compiles with pbuilder.
Lintian 1.23.22 has a warning, the solution is simple - take out the
libqt4-{gui,core} entries from the Depends line and allow shlibs:Depen
sc
I'm happy to receive any feedback on how the package can be improved,
and if it is good enough, to have it uploaded.
Cheers,
-Ted Percival
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Charles Plessy wrote:
> I am packaging a software which includes tests to check if the binary is
> fully funcionnal. However, those tests are much more processor intensive
> than the compilation itself. Is there a general policy about what to do
> with them? Is it enough to run them when testing th
Martin Kelly wrote:
> After trying to build my package (pyecm), I recieved the following error:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Desktop/pyecm-0.1$ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
> parsechangelog/debian: error: badly formatted trailer line, at file
> debian/changelog line 5
> dpkg-buildpackage: unable to det
Martin Kelly wrote:
> It builds these binary packages:
> pyecm - Factors large numbers (<= 50 digits) using ECM (Elliptic Curve
> Method)
I suggest changing the short description to:
Factors large numbers (up to 50 digits) using the Elliptic Curve
Method (ECM)
And possibly even leaving off t
kes sense... will do. Do I need to delete the package from
> mentors.debian.net and then re-upload it or just change the description
> before a sponsor accepts it?
>
> Martin
>
> Ted Percival wrote:
>> Martin Kelly wrote:
>>> It builds these binary packages:
>&
Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 11:27:25PM +1000, Ted Percival wrote:
I have prepared a package of fetchexc, a program for retrieving email from
Microsoft Exchange servers. I am seeking comments on the packaging.
>
Which exchange versions? I think exch5 and exch2k have differ
I have prepared a package of fetchexc, a program for retrieving email
from Microsoft Exchange servers. I am seeking comments on the packaging.
I am not seeking sponsorship at the moment - Amaya showed some interest
in sponsoring the package a while ago.
I have posted to the pkg-java-maintainer
19 matches
Mail list logo
