Cheers for the review Mattia! I'll look into all of this. A few comments:
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> ...
> * d/patches/01_makefile_fixes.patch:
> + Probably use += instead of ?= in the first CFLAGS?
> + I'd rather use install(1) instead of cp(1)
> + Really for
Still looking for a sponsor for the spin verification tool. I added a
spin-dbg binary package to the mix earlier today:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/spin
Builds fine in pbuilder, is lint clean, etc. Appreciate reviews too!
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
Great, got it -- thanks Paul. Uploading to mentors again now.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:59 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Tom Lee wrote:
>
> > N.B. no watchfile is present due to the naming strategy of the upstream
> tarball:
> > uscan interprets
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the "spin" package:
* Package name: spin
Version : 6.4.5
Upstream Author : Gerard J. Holzmann
* URL : http://spinroot.com
* License : BSD-3-clause
Section :
did you
> really find all unique values? Try:
>
> grep ^Status: /var/lib/dpkg/status | sort | uniq -c
>
> cheers, josch
>
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
///
>
> My query means not installed and installed !(ii)
>
> When dpkg read it, dpkg read from where?
>
>
> --Regards
> Mohsen
>
>
> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with
> a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: https://lists.debian.org/554ec53c.9090...@pahlevanzadeh.org
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
https://github.com/redis/hiredis/issues/327 -- sounds like upstream's
on-board. Thanks for your help Andrey!
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 10:43:57PM -0700, Tom Lee wrote:
> > After reading a little more about shared lib nami
f9abf
Cheers,
Tom
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Tom Lee wrote:
> Hey Andrey, thanks for the advice:
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 09:09:10PM -0700, Tom Lee wrote:
>> > By and large that's an e
Hey Andrey, thanks for the advice:
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 09:09:10PM -0700, Tom Lee wrote:
> > By and large that's an easy & mostly mechanical change, but both
> > libhiredis0.10 and libhiredis0.13 want to ins
ntains no backward-incompatible changes from 0.10
(which I have yet to verify), I feel like everything should continue to
work fine.
Is this the right way to handle the situation, or is there a better way to
do this?
Cheers,
Tom
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
?
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 13:29:48 -0700, Tom Lee wrote:
> > Does the Debian project have hardware/VMs set aside to help
> > packagers/upstream maintainers diagnose this sort of thing? I don't think
>
thing -- happy to ask there if it's
more appropriate.
Thanks!
Tom
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
For your review, Vincent:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/capnproto
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/capnproto/capnproto_0.3.0-1.dsc
Thanks again.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 13 novembre 2013 09:21 CET, Tom Lee :
>
> > Can I a
rote:
> ❦ 13 novembre 2013 09:04 CET, Tom Lee :
>
> > Yes it is -- all the libraries built by the source package have the same
> > version numbers.
> >
> > It wasn't too much trouble to split out libkj, so I did that. I can
> either
> > leave it that
13 at 11:46 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 13 novembre 2013 05:30 CET, Tom Lee :
>
> > I work on the packaging for capnproto.
> >
> > Upstream has provided a new source tarball that introduces a new shared
> > library (libkj). Theoretically, this shared library is sta
me demand for KJ being separate, I don't think we need to
divide the package yet."
I *think* I should extract libkj as a separate binary package & am
currently proceeding under that assumption, but thought I'd ask here RE:
whether I'm correct. Do I really need to split o
. Be
> sure to update the changelog entry in your git repository too.
>
> There is no other problem with the packages for me, so I have uploaded
> it.
> --
> Debian package sponsoring guidelines:
> http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html
>
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
Sorry, Debian Policy Manual :)
By the way, just uploaded the changelog modification to mentors, should
appear shortly. Nearly forgot to upload it.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 21 août 2013 09:02 CEST, Tom Lee :
>
> > Changelog squashed.
> >
&
e use of C++, which would place restrictions on
things like virtual functions being added & removed. The KDE guys have
documented some of this stuff:
http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C++
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦
Oops, just noticed I missed the leading upper-case 'T' for the capnproto
package. Fixed & pushing to mentors.d.n now.
Cheers,
Tom
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Tom Lee wrote:
> Done -- 0.2.1-1 was just uploaded to mentors:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/capn
Done -- 0.2.1-1 was just uploaded to mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/capnproto
Cheers,
Tom
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 20 août 2013 06:48 CEST, Tom Lee :
>
> > Alright, latest build of this package is up on mentors.debian.net:
follow up with a
0.2.1-1 build once 0.2.0-1 lands in unstable?
Cheers,
Tom
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 19 août 2013 11:46 CEST, Tom Lee :
>
> >> The easiest way is to use Lintian (I use it with -viI).
> >>
> >>
> > Odd
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 19 août 2013 09:56 CEST, Tom Lee :
>
> >> - The hardening stuff does not seem to work correctly. Maybe you could
> >>just try with debhelper 9 and debian/compat to 9 to have them apply
> >>auto
ng deprecated & I should use --with python2 to "fix" it.
I'll try it again tomorrow to be sure, but is that safe enough to ignore?
Easy enough either way.
> - In debian/control, don't start the short description with a capital
>for capnproto.
>
>
Shall do.
Should be able to push a new build of this package tomorrow. Thanks again!
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
n Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 19 août 2013 01:34 CEST, Tom Lee :
>
> > I'm thinking maybe I rip out the symbols file all together for now --
> > it sounds like the tooling isn't there for it yet. What do you think?
>
> Yes, just rem
ian.net/debian/pool/main/c/capnproto/capnproto_0.2.0-1.dsc
Thanks! Please let me know if I can do anything else to move this forward.
--
Tom Lee / http://tomlee.co / @tglee
18, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 18 août 2013 22:53 CEST, Tom Lee :
>
>> Ah, the Debug.Log hang seems like it might relate to a missing
>> /proc/self/exe symlink -- probably because I didn't mount the /proc
>> filesystem. Here's the relevant bit
m guessing it's standard practice to
mount /proc when doing these chrooted builds?
And assuming the build servers are using a chroot, can I also assume
they will mount procfs on /proc prior to executing a build?
Either way, I'm going to mount /proc in my chroot & try again.
On Sun, A
s. Did you use something like pbuilder/cowbuilder? If
>> not, you should. But I don't see how this could lead to such a
>> backtrace.
>
> Same problem at home. I am building on AMD64. Please try in a sid
> pbuilder if you didn't.
> --
> Use data arrays to avoid
mp; see if
there's anything enlightening in there.
> I am unable to compile the package on a clean chroot. The unittests
> fail:
>
>
>
Weird -- I'll try that out myself & see if I can figure out what's going wrong.
Cheers,
Tom
--
Tom Lee / http://tomlee.co /
ined from http://capnproto.org.
Changes since the last upload:
* Initial release (Closes: #719782)
Regards,
Tom Lee
--
Tom Lee / http://tomlee.co / @tglee
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> owner 719286 gh...@debian.org
> tags 719286 pending
> kthxbye
>
> [ also CCing the RFS bug ]
>
> On sab, ago 10, 2013 at 09:32:29 -0700, Tom Lee wrote:
> > Hey Alessandro,
>
> Hi,
>
> > Not
ained from http://redis.io/
Changes since the last upload:
* Fix incorrect --cflags & --libs in pkg-config file
Cheers,
Tom
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
33 matches
Mail list logo
