On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:25 AM, George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
You don't need to build-depend on 'quilt' with '3.0 (quilt)' source format if
you don't have patch/unpatch logic in your debian/rules; they are applied on
unpack phase. This is your case, hence I pointed you to FAQ #2.
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Ury Stankevich ury...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:25 AM, George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
You don't need to build-depend on 'quilt' with '3.0 (quilt)' source format if
you don't have patch/unpatch logic in your debian/rules
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:29 AM, George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
Package looks good, though I'd like to:
1) drop quilt from Build-Depends.
Hi,
i'm not really sure if i should drop quilt from Build-Depends, since
one tine patch still here.
(yes, i made a bit of mess here: patch 10* is
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 7:42 PM, George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
As a start your debian/changelog does not mention that a patch was dropped
since it has been applied upstream. It is not a big deal in that particular
case, but changelog entries are meant to be read by a much broader
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.6-1
of my package stx-btree.
It builds these binary packages:
stx-btree-demo - b+tree implementation in c++, demo program
stx-btree-dev - b+tree implementation in c++
stx-btree-doc - b+tree implementation in c++, doxygen
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.3-4
of my package stx-btree.
It builds these binary packages:
stx-btree-demo - b+tree implementation in c++, demo program
stx-btree-dev - b+tree implementation in c++
stx-btree-doc - b+tree implementation in c++, doxygen
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.3-3
of my package stx-btree.
It builds these binary packages:
stx-btree-demo - b+tree implementation in c++, demo program
stx-btree-dev - b+tree implementation in c++
stx-btree-doc - b+tree implementation in c++, doxygen
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.3-3
of my package stx-btree.
It builds these binary packages:
stx-btree-demo - b+tree implementation in c++, demo program
stx-btree-dev - b+tree implementation in c++
stx-btree-doc - b+tree implementation in c++, doxygen
2010/11/26 Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org:
Just one quick remark:
Have a look at your debian/patches/debian-changes-0.8.3-3, I don't think
it does what you intended to do (it creates
10_fix-configure-wxwindows.diff and series in stx-btree-0.8.3/patches/).
yes, my fault
now i had fixed
I would suggest removing the parallel support altogether, since this is only a
smallish package and fighting the target dependencies will not bring too much
of benefits. Agreed?
Hello,
can you check the fixed package ?
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stx-btree
- Source
Hi,
i can't repeat this bug..
I suspect it can be caused by errors in debian/rules, since in current
version of stx-btree i use `dh_prep` from both `install-arch` and
`install-indep` targets, can they interfere on multicore box ?
Maybe i should make some pre-install target and do all this stuff
Hello,
Very good, except that I forgot to mention that:
ifeq (,$(filter nostrip,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) ... endif
is not actually needed if debhelper is used, since dh_strip honors
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS for us. It is harmless, but best to be removed.
fixed.
One more thing I forgot to mention which
Hello,
* your binary-indep should not depend on targets that try compile the test-
suites (speedtest, wxbtreedemo, testsuite), but should only install
architecture independent parts of the source package into the corresponding
-dev (headers files containing templates) and -doc (doxygen files)
Hi,
Okay, in that case it is recommended to provide support for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS.
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-debianrules-options
(having noopt and nostrip should be fine)
Actually build target should depend on build-arch which handles the building
process.
ok, i
Thanks for your help, i have fixed flaws you notice.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package stx-btree.
Package name: stx-btree
Version : 0.8.3-2
Upstream Author : Timo Bingmann (Mail: tb a-with-circle idlebox dot net)
URL : http://idlebox.net/2007/stx-btree/
License : LGPL 2.1
Section
16 matches
Mail list logo
