On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:10 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Quoting "anatoly techtonik" :
>
>> What does this testing implies? If there is a reference document on
>> testing - somebody else may do this. This doc should exists even just
>> to tell which part
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:20 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Quoting "anatoly techtonik" :
>>
>> It's 9 months since the patch to upgrade trac-bitten was committed to
>> Debian repository and it's not packaged yet. Can anybody release it?
>
> Pr
at, Jan 1, 2011 at 5:06 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've sent a patch to trac-bitten package. It was committed into Python
> application team repository. What should I do now to make the package
> released?
>
> Please, CC.
> --
> anatoly t.
&g
Hi,
I've sent a patch to trac-bitten package. It was committed into Python
application team repository. What should I do now to make the package
released?
Please, CC.
--
anatoly t.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>> /var/lib/python-support/python2.4/.path
>> >> Can you recommend any best practices or helper scripts?
>> > a.) file a bug against the dependend package
>> Is it python-support?
>
> In this case I probably wouldn't file a bug as it involves
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> piuparts fails with error that seem unrelated to my package:
>>
>> 0m35.5s ERROR: Broken symlinks:
>> /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/python-support.pth ->
>> /var/lib/python-support/python2.4/.path
>>
>> Can you recommend any best practi
per scripts?
Please, CC.
Thanks.
--
anatoly t.
-- Forwarded message --
From: anatoly techtonik
Date: Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 9:44 AM
Subject: Errors with piuparts
To: debian-python
Hi,
I use pbuilder environment on lenny to test new trac-bitten with
piuparts, but the proc
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:02 AM, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I thought Build-Depends-Indep is for build-deps that are not needed by
> clean target.
What is the meaning of name "Build-Depends-Indep" then? Dependencies
that are required to build package, but from which "clean" rule is
indep
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Daniel Leidert
wrote:
> anatoly techtonik wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:30 PM, David Paleino wrote:
>> > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:07:04 +0200, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>> >
>> >> I am trying to use svn-buildpackage with
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:30 PM, David Paleino wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:07:04 +0200, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>
>> I am trying to use svn-buildpackage with pbuilder to check my dependencies.
>> pbuilder documentation mentions that it automatically satisfy the
>> b
Hi,
I am trying to use svn-buildpackage with pbuilder to check my dependencies.
pbuilder documentation mentions that it automatically satisfy the
build-dependencies inside chroot, but this doesn't happen.
I execute
$ svn-buildpackage --svn-ignore-new --svn-builder='pdebuild'
and get the error me
Hello,
I've described situation around Build-Depends-Indep at
http://wiki.debian.org/Build-Depends-Indep
I hope it will be useful for people who are looking for description of
this field. However, I am not expert in packaging, and some
information is obviously missing. If you can fill the blanks,
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Goswin von Brederlow
wrote:
> Ansgar Burchardt writes:
>
>> anatoly techtonik writes:
>>
>>> Can anybody point me to the part of the policy where Build-Depends and
>>> Build-Depends-Indep differences are explained?
&g
To: anatoly techtonik
Cc: debian-python
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 09:34, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> Sorry for the lame question, but I couldn't find an explanation of
> difference between Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep in Debian
> manuals. Can anybody explain when Build-De
14 matches
Mail list logo
