Thanks for your interest in Debian.
I downloaded your files but they aren't lintian compliant and seem to be
corrupted. Could you correct this ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ lintian -i xspringies_1.12-1_i386.changes
E: xspringies_1.12-1_i386.changes: md5sum-mismatch-in-changes-file
xspringies_1.12-1.ds
Thanks for your interest in Debian.
I downloaded your files but they aren't lintian compliant and seem to be
corrupted. Could you correct this ?
[eric@femto:~]$ lintian -i xspringies_1.12-1_i386.changes
E: xspringies_1.12-1_i386.changes: md5sum-mismatch-in-changes-file
xspringies_1.12-1.dsc
N:
I had a look at your package. It behaved ok on my machine, files are correct
too. Lintian clean. Wish we had more 1st packages of this quality :-)
I uploaded your files to ftp-master.debian.org.
Not sure your Closes: command will work. It might be closes: I don't know.
Thanks for your contributi
I had a look at your package. It behaved ok on my machine, files are correct
too. Lintian clean. Wish we had more 1st packages of this quality :-)
I uploaded your files to ftp-master.debian.org.
Not sure your Closes: command will work. It might be closes: I don't know.
Thanks for your contribut
I just adopted xabacus.
It conflicts with xmabacus because both try to install
the same config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/Abacus.
Policy is really strict about this :
11.7.4 Sharing configuration files
Packages which specify the same file as `conffile' must be tagged as
conflicting w
I just adopted xabacus.
It conflicts with xmabacus because both try to install
the same config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/Abacus.
Policy is really strict about this :
11.7.4 Sharing configuration files
Packages which specify the same file as `conffile' must be tagged as
conflicting
I posted an ITP: ardour -- a Linux Digital Audio Workstation (bug #95870).
Sadly enough, upstream author doesn't seem to agree on me doing this.
What can you advice me to do ? Should I try to convince him ? Or package it
anyway ?
As the code is GPL'd, that's to say "freely redistributable", the
I posted an ITP: ardour -- a Linux Digital Audio Workstation (bug #95870).
Sadly enough, upstream author doesn't seem to agree on me doing this.
What can you advice me to do ? Should I try to convince him ? Or package it
anyway ?
As the code is GPL'd, that's to say "freely redistributable", th
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 01:15:38AM -0300, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello ALL!
>
> I've made a package out of tcpspy. This is a tcp connections logger
> (to syslog) which doesn't use libpcap. It has been very useful for
> that machines y
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 01:15:38AM -0300, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello ALL!
>
> I've made a package out of tcpspy. This is a tcp connections logger
> (to syslog) which doesn't use libpcap. It has been very useful for
> that machines
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:11:40PM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 03:09:08AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > dpkg-source: error: per-package paragraph 2 in control info file is missing
> > Package line
>
> The error it points to is the missing second paragraph in t
I'm building a package which is a simple tcl script. No binaries. Do I need to
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends} ?
Or is this fine :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/s25manager-0.82]$ less debian/control
Source: s25manager
Section: main/comm
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:11:40PM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 03:09:08AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > dpkg-source: error: per-package paragraph 2 in control info file is missing
>Package line
>
> The error it points to is the missing second paragraph in the
I'm building a package which is a simple tcl script. No binaries. Do I need to
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends} ?
Or is this fine :
[eric@femto:~/debian/s25manager-0.82]$ less debian/control
Source: s25manager
Section: main/comm
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bu
Trying to build a new package I get this :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/s25manager-0.82]$ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is s25manager
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.82-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dpkg-buil
Trying to build a new package I get this :
[eric@femto:~/debian/s25manager-0.82]$ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is s25manager
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.82-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dpkg-buildpack
16 matches
Mail list logo