dpkg-source unhappy

Trying to build a new package I get this : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/s25manager-0.82]$ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot dpkg-buildpackage: source package is s25manager dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.82-1 dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dpkg-buil

shlibs:Depends

I'm building a package which is a simple tcl script. No binaries. Do I need to Depends: ${shlibs:Depends} ? Or is this fine : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/s25manager-0.82]$ less debian/control Source: s25manager Section: main/comm Priority: optional Maintainer: Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: dpkg-source unhappy

On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:11:40PM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 03:09:08AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > dpkg-source: error: per-package paragraph 2 in control info file is missing > > Package line > > The error it points to is the missing second paragraph in t

Re: advocate and sponsor needed: tcpspy package

On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 01:15:38AM -0300, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello ALL! > > I've made a package out of tcpspy. This is a tcp connections logger > (to syslog) which doesn't use libpcap. It has been very useful for > that machines y

Fwd: Re: ardour & quasimodo debian packages

I posted an ITP: ardour -- a Linux Digital Audio Workstation (bug #95870). Sadly enough, upstream author doesn't seem to agree on me doing this. What can you advice me to do ? Should I try to convince him ? Or package it anyway ? As the code is GPL'd, that's to say "freely redistributable", the

2 packages sharing the same config file.

I just adopted xabacus. It conflicts with xmabacus because both try to install the same config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/Abacus. Policy is really strict about this : 11.7.4 Sharing configuration files Packages which specify the same file as `conffile' must be tagged as conflicting w

Re: sponsor required for gstar (ITP #88503)

I had a look at your package. It behaved ok on my machine, files are correct too. Lintian clean. Wish we had more 1st packages of this quality :-) I uploaded your files to ftp-master.debian.org. Not sure your Closes: command will work. It might be closes: I don't know. Thanks for your contributi

Re: I made xpringies as debian package

Thanks for your interest in Debian. I downloaded your files but they aren't lintian compliant and seem to be corrupted. Could you correct this ? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ lintian -i xspringies_1.12-1_i386.changes E: xspringies_1.12-1_i386.changes: md5sum-mismatch-in-changes-file xspringies_1.12-1.ds

dpkg-source unhappy

Trying to build a new package I get this : [eric@femto:~/debian/s25manager-0.82]$ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot dpkg-buildpackage: source package is s25manager dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.82-1 dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dpkg-buildpack

shlibs:Depends

I'm building a package which is a simple tcl script. No binaries. Do I need to Depends: ${shlibs:Depends} ? Or is this fine : [eric@femto:~/debian/s25manager-0.82]$ less debian/control Source: s25manager Section: main/comm Priority: optional Maintainer: Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bu

Re: dpkg-source unhappy

On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:11:40PM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 03:09:08AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > dpkg-source: error: per-package paragraph 2 in control info file is missing >Package line > > The error it points to is the missing second paragraph in the

Re: advocate and sponsor needed: tcpspy package

On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 01:15:38AM -0300, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello ALL! > > I've made a package out of tcpspy. This is a tcp connections logger > (to syslog) which doesn't use libpcap. It has been very useful for > that machines

Fwd: Re: ardour & quasimodo debian packages

I posted an ITP: ardour -- a Linux Digital Audio Workstation (bug #95870). Sadly enough, upstream author doesn't seem to agree on me doing this. What can you advice me to do ? Should I try to convince him ? Or package it anyway ? As the code is GPL'd, that's to say "freely redistributable", th

2 packages sharing the same config file.

I just adopted xabacus. It conflicts with xmabacus because both try to install the same config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/Abacus. Policy is really strict about this : 11.7.4 Sharing configuration files Packages which specify the same file as `conffile' must be tagged as conflicting

Re: sponsor required for gstar (ITP #88503)

I had a look at your package. It behaved ok on my machine, files are correct too. Lintian clean. Wish we had more 1st packages of this quality :-) I uploaded your files to ftp-master.debian.org. Not sure your Closes: command will work. It might be closes: I don't know. Thanks for your contribut

Re: I made xpringies as debian package

Thanks for your interest in Debian. I downloaded your files but they aren't lintian compliant and seem to be corrupted. Could you correct this ? [eric@femto:~]$ lintian -i xspringies_1.12-1_i386.changes E: xspringies_1.12-1_i386.changes: md5sum-mismatch-in-changes-file xspringies_1.12-1.dsc N: