Re: unsubcribe

2024-08-12 Thread Lucas Castro
Please, send a mail to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with subject 'unsubscribe' On 12/08/2024 14:38, Michael Hathaway wrote: OpenPGP_0x42F79A5E0A4D5598.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

2024-08-06 Thread Lucas Castro
On 31/07/2024 11:05, Boyuan Yang wrote: On Sun, 12 May 2024 15:05:05 -0300 Lucas Castro wrote: Sorry for top posting. The debian/control was modified to append Git fields, Cvs-Git and Cvs-Browser. Git repository is following the DEP-14 as suggested, I really appreciated that workflow

Re: Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

2024-07-31 Thread Lucas Castro
On 31/07/2024 11:05, Boyuan Yang wrote: On Sun, 12 May 2024 15:05:05 -0300 Lucas Castro wrote: Sorry for top posting. The debian/control was modified to append Git fields, Cvs-Git and Cvs-Browser. Git repository is following the DEP-14 as suggested, I really appreciated that workflow

Re: Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

2024-05-12 Thread Lucas Castro
ical. I'm thinking about to delete the unstable. I'll maintain just the debian/latest for development, debian/ for backports, security and propose-update and mentioned on DEP-14. Thanks, Lucas Castro Em 11/05/2024 03:44, Tobias Frost escreveu: On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 08:02:17PM +0200,

Re: Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

2024-05-06 Thread Lucas Castro
Em 06/05/2024 11:31, Daniel Gröber escreveu: Hi Lucas, Hi d-mentors (there's a workflow question below), On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 05:16:54PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: The source builds the following binary packages: foolsm - Link connectivity monitor tool lsm - Link connect

Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

2024-03-24 Thread Lucas Castro
0.21-1.dsc Em 24/03/2024 16:50, Lucas Castro escreveu: Em 23/03/2024 13:08, Tobias Frost escreveu: Control: tags -1 moreinfo The source package name is still being renamed, and the source package rename is not explictly stated in the changelog. Source package already kept old project name, o

Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

2024-03-24 Thread Lucas Castro
atch, ASAP I'll forward to upstream. Already uploaded to mentors. -- tobi Thanks Tobias. On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 22:25:04 -0300 Lucas Castro wrote: Em 06/03/2024 05:49, Daniel Gröber escreveu: Hi Lucas, On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 03:29:49PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: Are you sure you want

Re: Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

2024-03-14 Thread Lucas Castro
Em 06/03/2024 05:49, Daniel Gröber escreveu: Hi Lucas, On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 03:29:49PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: Are you sure you want to change the source package name? Doing so fractures the history of the package on tracker.d.o and it's not really necessary. The upstream has ch

Re: Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

2024-03-05 Thread Lucas Castro
UNTIL YOU REMOVE ME! On 05.03.24 19:29, Lucas Castro wrote: Em 05/03/2024 08:09, Daniel Gröber escreveu: Hi Lucas, On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 04:50:27PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote:   * Package name : foolsm Are you sure you want to change the source package name? Doing so fractures the hist

Re: Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

2024-03-05 Thread Lucas Castro
Em 05/03/2024 08:09, Daniel Gröber escreveu: Hi Lucas, On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 04:50:27PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: * Package name : foolsm Are you sure you want to change the source package name? Doing so fractures the history of the package on tracker.d.o and it's not r

Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

2024-02-19 Thread Lucas Castro
(1.0.21-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release * debian/watch updated * debian/patches/ cleaned out Regards, -- Lucas Castro OpenPGP_0x42F79A5E0A4D5598.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Is valid for Debian a source code not in English? (was Help to know if a package is valid)

2022-08-19 Thread Lucas Castro
Em 16/08/2022 22:50, braulio escreveu: On 22/08/05 15:36, braulio wrote: Good afternoon. I need help with a situation. I packaged a program under the GPL-3+ license where Upstream wrote all the texts in its native language Pt-Br, and for the packaging, I did all the translation to English,

Bug#970246: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-2 [RC] -- Link connectivity monitor tool

2020-09-13 Thread Lucas Castro
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lsm": * Package name : lsm Version : 1.0.4-2 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : http://lsm.foobar.fi/ * License : GPL-2 Section : utils It builds those binary

Bug#847969: RFS: libpam-ldap/186-2

2016-12-19 Thread Lucas Castro
On 18-12-2016 10:30, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 02:54:18PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: >> Ready for upload. > The changelog still says 3.6.8. > So, done. -- Lucas Castro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Bug#847969: RFS: libpam-ldap/186-2

2016-12-18 Thread Lucas Castro
On 18-12-2016 10:30, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 02:54:18PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: >> Ready for upload. > The changelog still says 3.6.8. Mind crashing, I've noticed just the 's' missing on standard[s]-version. -- Lucas Castro signatu

Bug#847969: RFS: libpam-ldap/186-2

2016-12-17 Thread Lucas Castro
Ready for upload. On 14-12-2016 13:36, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Please remove extra empty lines from the changelog entry. > Why did you enable DH_VERBOSE=1? >

Re: Bug#847969: RFS: libpam-ldap/186-2

2016-12-16 Thread Lucas Castro
Thank you Eriberto, On 14-12-2016 13:55, Eriberto wrote: > Standards-Version = 3.6.8? (debian/changelog) > > > 2016-12-14 14:36 GMT-02:00 Andrey Rahmatullin : >> Please remove extra empty lines from the changelog entry. >> Why did you enable DH_VERBOSE=1? >> >> -- >> WBR, wRAR

Bug#847969: RFS: libpam-ldap/186-2

2016-12-14 Thread Lucas Castro
On 14-12-2016 13:36, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Please remove extra empty lines from the changelog entry. > Why did you enable DH_VERBOSE=1? > Already fixed. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#847969: RFS: libpam-ldap/186-2

2016-12-12 Thread Lucas Castro
y, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-ldap/libpam-ldap_186-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: It fixes #844666 bug. Regards, Lucas Castro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Problems creating babel-polyfill.min.js

2016-11-07 Thread Lucas Castro
ust for a single package dependence, but think about all the package that didn't get in Debian yet just because of that dependence. I want to start the works on babel modules packaging soon, jut got some issues about how to split all modules that comes all together in single tarball. -- Lucas Castro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

RFS: node-everything.js/1.0.3-1

2016-10-27 Thread Lucas Castro
using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-everything.js/node-everything.js_1.0.3-1.dsc Regards, Lucas Castro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

2016-07-27 Thread Lucas Castro
On 27-07-2016 14:23, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > >> Who missing? I've checked, it's okay. > > > you right > >> About that, it's a new version with some patches I've forwarded. >> I'll wait for this version get in Debian to investigate the new version >> changes. > > I can sponsor, or w

Re: Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

2016-07-27 Thread Lucas Castro
t-status --no-verbose > uscan: Newest version of lsm on remote site is 1.0.5, local version is 1.0.4 > uscan:=> Newer package available from > http://lsm.foobar.fi/download/lsm-1.0.5.tar.gz About that, it's a new version with some patches I've forwarded. I'll wait for this version get in Debian to investigate the new version changes. > G. -- Lucas Castro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

2016-07-23 Thread Lucas Castro
On 22-07-2016 00:31, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:25:00PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: >> I've got a little busy, but I uploaded a reviewed package, >> if you can take a look at it I'll thanks. >> >> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/m

Re: Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

2016-07-14 Thread Lucas Castro
On 21-05-2016 12:21, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:09:14PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: >> On 21-05-2016 11:59, Adam Borowski wrote: >>> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:31:49PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: >>>> But I don't think I need to write a

Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

2016-05-21 Thread Lucas Castro
On 21-05-2016 11:59, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:31:49PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: >> On 14-05-2016 20:45, Adam Borowski wrote: >>> Only upon checking the syslog I see: >>> May 15 00:30:37 umbar lsm[12853]: no targets found in config file >&

Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

2016-05-20 Thread Lucas Castro
On 14-05-2016 20:45, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 12:22:13AM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: >> On 13-05-2016 11:46, Adam Borowski wrote: >>>> On 10-05-2016 02:43, Lucas Castro wrote >>>>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "

Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

2016-05-13 Thread Lucas Castro
On 13-05-2016 11:46, Adam Borowski wrote: >> On 10-05-2016 02:43, Lucas Castro wrote >>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lsm" >>> >>> * Package name: lsm >>> Upstream Author : Mika Ilmaranta >>> * URL

Re: Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

2016-05-12 Thread Lucas Castro
Hello, I made some changes at the packages, if someone can sponsor I'll thanks. On 10-05-2016 02:43, Lucas Castro wrote > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a spon

Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

2016-05-09 Thread Lucas Castro
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lsm" * Package name: lsm Version : 1.0.4-1 Upstream Author : Mika Ilmaranta * URL : http://lsm.foobar.fi/ * Lice

Re: Need help to fix hardening-no-relro and hardening-no-relro

2015-08-11 Thread lucas castro
Okay, confirmed, solved the hardening-no-relro, and Now I can see I make a mistake on subject, It was to be hardening-no-relro and hardening-no-fortify-functions. On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:50 AM, lucas castro wrote: > I'll do that, and send to mentors. > > On Tue, Aug 11, 20

Re: Need help to fix hardening-no-relro and hardening-no-relro

2015-08-11 Thread lucas castro
overriding CFLAGS and CPPFLAGS but not LDFLAGS will solve FTBFS. > > For example in debian/rules, > > CFLAGS = '-Ofoo' > CPPFLAGS = '-Dfoo' > LDFLAGS += '-lfoo' > > override_dh_auto_configure: > dh_auto_configure -- --enable-foo > > Cheers, &

Re: Need help to fix hardening-no-relro and hardening-no-relro

2015-08-11 Thread lucas castro
Gianfranco, No problem about about that on irc. I think I should take a time on another package, then mailed here. and if anyone know about this, it's fine. I really spent much time on this package, and learned a lot with it. On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna < costamagnagianf

Need help to fix hardening-no-relro and hardening-no-relro

2015-08-11 Thread lucas castro
I'm getting harderning issue on packaging xmbmon. I already looked at https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening, but no success. I uploaded the source to mentors[1], and the attachment is the build log. [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmbmon/xmbmon_2.05-8.dsc -- contatos: Celular: ( 99

Bug#792443: RFS: mirage/0.9.5.1-4 [QA]

2015-07-15 Thread lucas castro
bout invalid > character in version number (two underscores). > > 6. You must always check the PTS[2] to search for bugs, tips etc. In > bugs list I can see a relevant bug that you can close: #773997. > > [2] https://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mirage.html > > Thanks for your w

Bug#792443: RFS: mirage/0.9.5.1-4 [QA]

2015-07-14 Thread Lucas Castro
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mirage" This orphaned packages required some lintian corrections and I had done, it already has two P lintians, but it is its homepage fields and signature that I didn't found. *