RFS: genwebgallery

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "genwebgallery". * Package name: genwebgallery Version : 0.7-1 Upstream Author : markus schnalke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://prog.marmaro.de/genwebgallery * License : MIT Secti

Re: RFS: genwebgallery

Murphy sayed you will always forget something in emails ... and so did I ;-) I wanted to post a link to a web gallery generated with `genwebgallery'. Here it is: http://tmp.marmaro.de/genwebgallery-example/index.html meillo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: genwebgallery

schoenfeld / in-medias-res <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 09:37:37PM +0200, markus schnalke wrote: > > genwebgallery is written in sh, without bashism. > > please don't get me wrong, but your script (regardless of weither its > good in what

Re: Building a build environment

[2008-07-29 10:18] Richard Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Since I'm not running Sid on any of my machines, I had > the though of using VirtualBox on my Ubuntu machine to create a clean > Sid build environment. Does this make sense? I was in the same situation some month ago and used cowdancer/

Re: pbuilder/pdebuild mini-howto (Was: Building a build environment)

[2008-07-30 10:51] Jens Peter Secher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 2008/7/29 Richard Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I am just getting started in Debian package building and I need to know if > > this idea is valid or if there is a better way. > > [...] > > What do you use? > > I find pbuilder easiest to w

Re: pbuilder/pdebuild mini-howto (Was: Building a build environment)

[2008-07-30 12:39] Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, markus schnalke wrote: > > When I configured pbuilder some time ago, I couldn't manage to use > > different locations than /var/cache/pbuilder when using > > cowdancer/cowbuilder with it.

literally '?' in debconf template

Hello mentors, lintian reports this warning: using-question-in-extended-description-in-templates (see [1]) But there is no question where lintian sees one. Instead it's a literally question mark. The text is: "You can use wildcard expressions like '*' or '?'." How can I solve the situation?

Re: literally '?' in debconf template

[2008-09-28 22:16] Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > This one time, at band camp, George Danchev said: > > On Sunday 28 September 2008 22:08:28 markus schnalke wrote: > > > > > lintian reports this warning: > > > using-question-in-extended

RFS: masqmail (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.21-5 of my package "masqmail". It builds these binary packages: masqmail - A mailer for hosts without permanent internet connection The package appears to be lintian clean. Exactly, this is what this package is now: lintian clean

Re: RFS: fex (2nd attempt)

[2008-11-04 20:47] Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > So, I really don't understand your "Sounds like another package > that no-one needs in Debian, except the maintainer" sentence, and I really > don't > understand what I should justify. Having a new package means more work for the proje

How to get rid of dir-or-file-in-var-run?

Hoi, I maintain masqmail, a mail transfer agent. It stores files in /var/run. Now I have this lintian warning: dir-or-file-in-var-run. Unfortunately, I dont know how to get the warning disappear. I checked the init script. It creates the /var/run/masqmail on startup. Also comments and changelog

Re: How to get rid of dir-or-file-in-var-run?

[2009-05-23 12:23] Daniel Moerner > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:05 AM, markus schnalke wrote: > > > >I maintain masqmail, a mail transfer agent. It stores files in > >/var/run. Now I have this lintian warning: dir-or-file-in-var-run. > > > >Unfortunately, I

Re: How to get rid of dir-or-file-in-var-run?

[2009-05-23 20:52] Russ Allbery > markus schnalke writes: > > > I maintain masqmail, a mail transfer agent. It stores files in > > /var/run. Now I have this lintian warning: dir-or-file-in-var-run. > > > > Unfortunately, I dont know how to get the warning disappe

Re: Both dpkg-source -x foo.dsc and lintian seems to ignore trustedkeys.gpg keyring

[2009-05-24 18:45] Patrick Matthäi > José Manuel Santamaría Lema schrieb: > > > > A few hours ago, after upgrading my system, I got a new warning from > > lintian in my packages (I'm not on debian-maintainers.gpg keyring): > > > > > > $ lintian -i -I subtitlecomposer_0.5.2-1.dsc > > I: subtitle

RFS: masqmail (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.21-6 of my package "masqmail". It builds these binary packages: masqmail - mail transport agent for intermittently connected hosts The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 174975, 416237, 417842,

Re: RFS: masqmail (updated package)

[2009-05-24 23:11] markus schnalke > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.21-6 > of my package "masqmail". > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Now, someone did ... but how can I find out, who? The mail from mentors does not contain

Re: RFS: masqmail (updated package)

[2009-05-28 22:25] Y Giridhar Appaji Nag > On 09/05/28 17:21 +0200, markus schnalke said ... > > [2009-05-24 23:11] markus schnalke > > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.21-6 > > > of my package "masqmail". > >