Bug#919413: latest ratt job

2019-03-06 Thread Paolo Greppi
e, texlive-plain-generic or texlive-bibtex-extra) - only 9 show interesting errors For details see: https://salsa.debian.org/paolog-guest/doxygen/wikis/ratt6 Paolo

Bug#919413: cascade of FTBFS

2019-02-14 Thread Paolo Greppi
ter/debian/libmojolicious-perl.links I 'm afraid we will not be able to avoid embedding jquery in doxygen, because it makes a weird use of it. The matter has been nicely put down by the former maintaners, see: https://salsa.debian.org/paolog-guest/doxygen/blob/master/debian/README.jquery Paolo

Bug#919413: ratt job complete

2019-02-10 Thread Paolo Greppi
The latest full ratt job on amd64 is complete: https://salsa.debian.org/paolog-guest/doxygen/wikis/ratt4 In synthesis, of 730 build deps of doxygen 59 failed but 51 "maybe unrelated to new changes" and only 8 seem due to the new doxygen version. I think no new issues appeared. Paolo

Bug#919413: fix and status update

2019-02-05 Thread Paolo Greppi
Following a suggestion by sthibault, I added texlive-plain-generic as build dep for doxygen-latex. With that change, I did a partial ratt job, focusing on the 9 build-dependencies of doxygen mentioned above. Details here: https://salsa.debian.org/paolog-guest/doxygen/wikis/ratt3 The new version

Bug#919413: Bug#921293: hwloc: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.8.15

2019-02-05 Thread Paolo Greppi
n-latex depends on texlive-latex-extra which only recommends texlive-plain-generic I'll make that change, rebuild all nine packages and post the results to bug 919413 Paolo

Bug#919413: here are the 9 bugs I created

2019-02-03 Thread Paolo Greppi
://bugs.debian.org/921298 caffe: https://bugs.debian.org/921299 frobby: https://bugs.debian.org/921300 starpu: https://bugs.debian.org/921301 Paolo

Bug#919413: ready for unstable

2019-02-03 Thread Paolo Greppi
unstable, is here: https://salsa.debian.org/paolog-guest/doxygen Paolo

Bug#919413: RFS: doxygen/1.8.15-1~exp1 [ITA]

2019-01-15 Thread Paolo Greppi
le. Closes: #863054 -- Paolo Greppi Tue, 15 Jan 2019 18:17:17 +0100 Regards, Paolo Greppi

Bug#895812: Fwd: RFS: json-editor.js/0.7.28+ds-1 [ITP]

2018-04-16 Thread Paolo Greppi
debhelper does not yet support building with grunt out of the box (https://bugs.debian.org/845043) so you have to manually add that to debian/rules, see: https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=grunt+build+path%3Adebian%2Frules https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs#Using_build_tools_like_grunt Paolo

Bug#883611:

2017-12-06 Thread Paolo Gigante
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/auter/auter_0.11-1.dsc Thanks Paolo

Bug#883611:

2017-12-06 Thread Paolo Gigante
system administrators are maintaining environments with multiple Linux distributions and having a tool which can be configured in the same way regardless of distribution is a huge advantage. Thanks Paolo On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Pa

Bug#883611:

2017-12-06 Thread Paolo Gigante
Hi Juhani, Thanks for the advise, I will start to work on that now but I am also trying to ensure that the same package will build for ubuntu based systems which is why I used compat 9 however I will try add an appropriate check in the Makefile for that. Hi Bart, I am not entirely sure about the

Bug#883611: RFS: auter/0.11 (ITP: Bug#880600)

2017-12-05 Thread Paolo Gigante
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "auter" * Package name: auter Version : 0.11 Upstream Author : Paolo Gigante * URL : https://github.com/rackerlabs/auter * License

Bug#706556: QA: decibel-audio-player/1.08-1

2013-05-01 Thread Paolo Rotolo
lowing URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/decibel-audio-player Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release. Regards, Paolo Rotolo - paolorot...@ubuntu.com

Bug#692125: RFS: raphael/2.1.0-1

2012-11-02 Thread Paolo Rotolo
URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/imagemagick Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release. Regards, Paolo Rotolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: htt

Re: howto move experimental -> sid

2005-09-14 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:10:56PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote: > > > Experimental is not in the buildd loop, so that's no waste of resource... > > not in the buildd.net one, but within http://experimental.ftbfs.de/ > which is run by aba. > That's an aba's problem :-P -- Francesco P. Lovergine

Re: howto move experimental -> sid

2005-09-14 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 06:32:08PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 06:02:56PM +0200, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote: > > > Reupload to unstable with: > > > > package (2.9.18-3) unstable; urgency=low > > > > instead of > > > > package (2.9.18-2experi1) experimental; urgency=l

Re: reporting lintian and linda overrides

2005-01-23 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 03:58:00PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 09:45:10AM -0500, Jereme Corrado wrote: > > One of my packages, (faqomatic) has a two non-standard directory > > permissions, (0755:www-data/www-data on /var/lib/fom and > > /var/lib/fom/meta) as they m

Re: XOOPS Debian Package

2005-01-06 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 05:40:18PM -0600, Erick Vresnev Castellanos Hernández wrote: > W: xoops: possible-bashism-in-maintainer-script postinst:23 > 'p{("a".."z","A".."Z",0..9)[int(rand(62))]}' You can either remove this kind of bashism or use explicitly /bin/bash in the shee-bang line. The latt

Re: All Bugzilla important bugs are fixed.

2004-12-04 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 12:41:44AM +0100, Alexis Sukrieh wrote: > * Francesco Paolo Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : > > Would you please give me cohordinates for your package? I could do the > > upload after a fast reviewing... > > No problem. > > You can find

Re: All Bugzilla important bugs are fixed.

2004-12-03 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 02:30:21PM +0100, Alexis Sukrieh wrote: > * Moritz Muehlenhoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : > > Francesco P. Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> NMUed the security fixes > > in 2.16.7 and offered to take care of 250638 as well. I'm CCing him > > to this mail. > > Ok, great. > >

PLML Sgml System Package [ looking for upload ]

2004-05-23 Thread paolo
/cgi-bin/oz.pl?hack Regards, Paolo Lulli pgpCuckgDS7TL.pgp Description: PGP signature

PLML Sgml System Package [ looking for upload ]

2004-05-23 Thread paolo
/cgi-bin/oz.pl?hack Regards, Paolo Lulli pgp2IdgIQQ7Xw.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Building multiple packages from a single source tree

2004-04-05 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 02:57:14PM -0400, Erik Bourget wrote: > > The new-maintainer faq seems to not go into this depth. Can anyone help me > out with this one? > Just have a look to a multi-binary packages. You can find a lot of them around. Basically you need to distinguish binary-dep and bi

Re: Building multiple packages from a single source tree

2004-04-05 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 02:57:14PM -0400, Erik Bourget wrote: > > The new-maintainer faq seems to not go into this depth. Can anyone help me > out with this one? > Just have a look to a multi-binary packages. You can find a lot of them around. Basically you need to distinguish binary-dep and bi

Re: DeMuDi

2003-10-26 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 09:46:16PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > For Debian however, we already have that, so I don't understand why > DeMuDi doesn't simply work with SID proper, and integrate themselves > into the existing Debian development process... > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel

Re: DeMuDi

2003-10-26 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 09:46:16PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > For Debian however, we already have that, so I don't understand why > DeMuDi doesn't simply work with SID proper, and integrate themselves > into the existing Debian development process... > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel

Re: checking dependencies

2003-07-22 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 06:44:51PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 01:03:09AM +0200, francesco levorato wrote: > > i used the following script as suggested from the nm-guide to realize > > which packages the application i am going to configure is going to > > depend on: > > Why

Re: checking dependencies

2003-07-22 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 06:44:51PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 01:03:09AM +0200, francesco levorato wrote: > > i used the following script as suggested from the nm-guide to realize > > which packages the application i am going to configure is going to > > depend on: > > Why

Re: tix8.1_8.1.4-1 not in testing -- why?

2003-04-17 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 10:38:12AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > could somebody enlighten me why the current tix8.1 package from unstable > hasn't moved to testing sometime in the last 100 days? > > The excuses page just says "valid candidate" and doesn't state any reason > why. > What about

Re: RFS: faqomatic

2003-03-31 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 09:24:37AM -0500, Jereme Corrado wrote: > Hello, > > > The current faqomatic maintainer has put the package up for > adoption and has kindly agreed to let me take it over. I have > packaged the newest upstream version and am looking for a sponsor, any > takers? > >

Re: RFS: faqomatic

2003-03-31 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 09:24:37AM -0500, Jereme Corrado wrote: > Hello, > > > The current faqomatic maintainer has put the package up for > adoption and has kindly agreed to let me take it over. I have > packaged the newest upstream version and am looking for a sponsor, any > takers? > >

How to request a new package and to maintain orphaned package?

2003-03-11 Thread Paolo Alexis Falcone
t? 2. I'd like to request for someone to sponsor these said packages :-) I'm still perusing the documentation at the Debian developer site, so please bear with my newbie-ness on the Debian developer/maintainer process. DEBIAN ROCKS! -- Paolo Alexis Falcone [EMAIL PROTECTED]

How to request a new package and to maintain orphaned package?

2003-03-10 Thread Paolo Alexis Falcone
st? 2. I'd like to request for someone to sponsor these said packages :-) I'm still perusing the documentation at the Debian developer site, so please bear with my newbie-ness on the Debian developer/maintainer process. DEBIAN ROCKS! -- Paolo Alexis Falcone [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCR

request for sponsorship

2003-02-28 Thread Paolo Alexis Falcone
said packages can be obtained in this apt source location: deb http://csdev.cas.upm.edu.ph/~pfalcone/debian unstable main non-free deb-src http://csdev.cas.upm.edu.ph/~pfalcone/debian unstable main non-free Thank you. -- Paolo Alexis Falcone [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This

request for sponsorship

2003-02-27 Thread Paolo Alexis Falcone
said packages can be obtained in this apt source location: deb http://csdev.cas.upm.edu.ph/~pfalcone/debian unstable main non-free deb-src http://csdev.cas.upm.edu.ph/~pfalcone/debian unstable main non-free Thank you. -- Paolo Alexis Falcone [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This

Re: Looking for sponsor (Kylix libs packaging project)

2003-01-13 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:43:40AM -, Linas Jakucionis wrote: > Hi, > > I am a developer of Kylix Libs Packaging Project > http://kylixlibs.sourceforge.net/ > > This project tries to package the required Kylix programming language > libraries for the most popular Linux distributions so that

Re: Looking for sponsor (Kylix libs packaging project)

2003-01-13 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:43:40AM -, Linas Jakucionis wrote: > Hi, > > I am a developer of Kylix Libs Packaging Project > http://kylixlibs.sourceforge.net/ > > This project tries to package the required Kylix programming language > libraries for the most popular Linux distributions so that

Re: intentions to work on ImageJ

2002-11-26 Thread Paolo Ariano
no answer came so ... ok for the next time. thanks paolo -- Paolo Ariano Neuroscience PhD Student DBAU & INFM Turin (Italy) La liberta' in coppi

Re: intentions to work on ImageJ

2002-11-26 Thread Paolo Ariano
so i posted another ITP. paolo -- Paolo Ariano Neuroscience PhD Student DBAU & INFM Turin (Italy) I bagni dovrebbero essere suddivisi in base al

Re: intentions to work on ImageJ

2002-11-26 Thread Paolo Ariano
no answer came so ... ok for the next time. thanks paolo -- Paolo Ariano Neuroscience PhD Student DBAU & INFM Turin (Italy) La liberta' in coppi

intentions to work on ImageJ

2002-11-26 Thread Paolo Ariano
hi all, i'd like to pack ImageJ -Image Processing and Analysis in Java- , and as suggested in the Developer's Reference: " you should post about your intentions to work on something to avoid duplicated effort" i'm posting to debian-mentors about my intentions and to

Re: intentions to work on ImageJ

2002-11-26 Thread Paolo Ariano
so i posted another ITP. paolo -- Paolo Ariano Neuroscience PhD Student DBAU & INFM Turin (Italy) I bagni dovrebbero essere suddivisi in base al

intentions to work on ImageJ

2002-11-26 Thread Paolo Ariano
hi all, i'd like to pack ImageJ -Image Processing and Analysis in Java- , and as suggested in the Developer's Reference: " you should post about your intentions to work on something to avoid duplicated effort" i'm posting to debian-mentors about my intentions and to

build-deps non non-US does not implies archiving in non-US?

2002-10-19 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
As I can read from policy 2.1.5: "A package depends on another package which is distributed via the non-us server has to be stored on the non-us server as well." How this rule should be interpreted for Build-deps and Suggests? Can a non non-US pkg Build-dep on or Suggest a non-US pkg? My guess

build-deps non non-US does not implies archiving in non-US?

2002-10-19 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
As I can read from policy 2.1.5: "A package depends on another package which is distributed via the non-us server has to be stored on the non-us server as well." How this rule should be interpreted for Build-deps and Suggests? Can a non non-US pkg Build-dep on or Suggest a non-US pkg? My guess

Re: Debian my own software

2002-09-28 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 08:34:44AM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > In one case where I debianized my own program, I settled on a > structure like this: > > 1/ the debian/ subdirectory is part of the "upstream" source > > 2/ a target in the top-level Makefile builds the debian source package > (i

Re: Debian my own software

2002-09-28 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 08:34:44AM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > In one case where I debianized my own program, I settled on a > structure like this: > > 1/ the debian/ subdirectory is part of the "upstream" source > > 2/ a target in the top-level Makefile builds the debian source package > (

Re: Debian my own software

2002-09-28 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:23:15PM +0200, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote: > Dear All, > > I want to make a debian package (and later even make it into the > Debian distribution) of one of my own (GPL-ed) software. > > What are the documents & tools that I must read? The Debian New > Maintainers guid

Re: Debian my own software

2002-09-28 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:23:15PM +0200, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote: > Dear All, > > I want to make a debian package (and later even make it into the > Debian distribution) of one of my own (GPL-ed) software. > > What are the documents & tools that I must read? The Debian New > Maintainers gui

Re: Looking for sponsor/criticism

2002-09-24 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 07:10:33PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: > > I'll just look around for something else to package up and go with that. > If somebody still wants to look at my packaging of the program, though, > and offer criticism (which I know it needs) I would appreciate it. If > you missed

Re: Looking for sponsor/criticism

2002-09-24 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 07:10:33PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: > > I'll just look around for something else to package up and go with that. > If somebody still wants to look at my packaging of the program, though, > and offer criticism (which I know it needs) I would appreciate it. If > you misse

Re: Questian about Architecture

2002-09-12 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:29:15PM +0100, Marco Kuhlmann wrote: > * Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200): > > > Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being > > ported to certain architectures? > Some software cannot be easily ported to any architectures.

Re: Questian about Architecture

2002-09-12 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:29:15PM +0100, Marco Kuhlmann wrote: > * Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200): > > > Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being > > ported to certain architectures? > Some software cannot be easily ported to any architectures.

Re: Orphan Packages

2002-07-22 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 04:22:13PM -0400, Tom Miller wrote: > Hello, > I am not a Debian Developer, however I hope to be becoming one > eventually, > as has happened on this board, most people who would like to become a > developer post a package to have someone sponser it. If I were to do

Re: Orphan Packages

2002-07-22 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 04:22:13PM -0400, Tom Miller wrote: > Hello, > I am not a Debian Developer, however I hope to be becoming one eventually, > as has happened on this board, most people who would like to become a > developer post a package to have someone sponser it. If I were to do t

Re: subscribe

2002-03-19 Thread Paolo Ulivi
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 03:04:21PM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Even gurus fails, sometimes... ;-) Paolo, IK5LGS -- If Linux is not Uni

Re: subscribe

2002-03-19 Thread Paolo Ulivi
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 03:04:21PM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Even gurus fails, sometimes... ;-) Paolo, IK5LGS -- If Linux is not Uni

Re: error when building package

2001-06-29 Thread Paolo Molaro
On 06/29/01 Etienne Grossmann wrote: > dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/tmp/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 > package `bloksi': > `Depends' field, missing package name, or garbage where package name expected > dh_builddeb: command returned error code > make: *** [binary-indep] Error 1 > > It

Re: 1st try at packaging perl program

2001-06-29 Thread Paolo Molaro
On 06/29/01 Etienne Grossmann wrote: > this is a near-copy of a mail I sent yesterday to debian-perl. I > think it is relevant to this list. > > I just managed to build a working .deb from a perl program (a game > that uses gtk and gnome), after a fair amount of cruft (*). > > I build it w/

Re: error when building package

2001-06-29 Thread Paolo Molaro
On 06/29/01 Etienne Grossmann wrote: > dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/tmp/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 package >`bloksi': > `Depends' field, missing package name, or garbage where package name expected > dh_builddeb: command returned error code > make: *** [binary-indep] Error 1 > > It

Re: 1st try at packaging perl program

2001-06-29 Thread Paolo Molaro
On 06/29/01 Etienne Grossmann wrote: > this is a near-copy of a mail I sent yesterday to debian-perl. I > think it is relevant to this list. > > I just managed to build a working .deb from a perl program (a game > that uses gtk and gnome), after a fair amount of cruft (*). > > I build it w

Re: Fwd: ITP: glib2, gtk2, inti

2001-06-07 Thread Paolo Molaro
On 06/05/01 Michèl Alexandre Salim wrote: > > Please LART upstream heavily and give the packages a > > proper name. That > > tradition has done it wrong is no reason to continue > > doing it the > > wrong way. The version numbering used upstream is completely reasonable: check the archives for th

Re: Fwd: ITP: glib2, gtk2, inti

2001-06-06 Thread Paolo Molaro
On 06/05/01 Michèl Alexandre Salim wrote: > > Please LART upstream heavily and give the packages a > > proper name. That > > tradition has done it wrong is no reason to continue > > doing it the > > wrong way. The version numbering used upstream is completely reasonable: check the archives for t

Re: Package checking

2001-02-23 Thread Paolo Molaro
On 02/23/01 Sam TH wrote: > > It's missing build-dependencies. > > Added. However, is there a good way to check build-depends, or do you > just have to guess? There are some tools discussed on debian-devel that help finding dependencies, search the archive for them. The most predictable way, tho

Re: Package checking

2001-02-23 Thread Paolo Molaro
On 02/23/01 Sam TH wrote: > > It's missing build-dependencies. > > Added. However, is there a good way to check build-depends, or do you > just have to guess? There are some tools discussed on debian-devel that help finding dependencies, search the archive for them. The most predictable way, th

Re: Package checking

2001-02-23 Thread Paolo Molaro
On 02/23/01 Sam TH wrote: > I'm an illustrious member of the NM queue, and have completed a > package that I would be very grateful if people would check for me, to > make sure that I haven't missed anything. It produces no errors or > warnings with lintian. > > The package is uf-view, and it's

Re: Package checking

2001-02-23 Thread Paolo Molaro
On 02/23/01 Sam TH wrote: > I'm an illustrious member of the NM queue, and have completed a > package that I would be very grateful if people would check for me, to > make sure that I haven't missed anything. It produces no errors or > warnings with lintian. > > The package is uf-view, and it's

Re: Packages with symlinks and CVS

1999-05-07 Thread Paolo Molaro
On Fri, May 07, 1999 at 01:13:04AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > That's OK, except that this package currently has 258 symlinks, and > both the number and details are likely to change on a fairly regular > basis. The thought of keeping that up to date is quite terrifying. > There must surely be a