Re: changes file issue when packaging for backports

2014-11-12 Thread quidame
Oops, not Priority: but Urgency: quidame wrote: > Hi, > > I try to backport bilibop_0.4.22 source package (native). If only changes > from 0.4.22 to 0.4.22~bpo70+1 are copied in to the changes file, lintian > complains with the 'backports-changes-missing' error tag

changes file issue when packaging for backports

2014-11-12 Thread quidame
ted in the bpo. should I edit the changes file to modify Priority: field and modify or remove Closes: field ? Or replave -v0.4.21 option by something more relevant (shortened changelog entry for 0.4.22) ? Or can I let it go 'as is' ? Cheers, quidame [1] https://lintian.debian.org/ta

Bug#675532: RFS: bilibop/0.1 (ITP #675467)

2013-09-17 Thread quidame
e right. It is due to a trailing ${Newline} in the "Description" variable. It was added to work around a bug [1] affecting dpkg-dev; but this bug having been fixed recently... the workaround becomes a bug :) So, fixed: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bilibop/bilibop_0

Bug#675532: RFS: bilibop/0.1 (ITP #675467)

2013-07-20 Thread quidame
;--info --verbose --pedantic' in my script. I thought it was enough, as mentors.debian.net/package/bilibop says 'Package is lintian clean'. The tags you mention are catched by '--display-info'. Fixed. So, here is the new version: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bilibop/bilibop_0.4.14.dsc Cheers quidame signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#675532: RFS: bilibop/0.1 (ITP #675467)

2013-07-04 Thread quidame
Hi, On 04/07/2013 08:49, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > I plan to review, and hopefully upload bilibop next week. Nice to hear :) The last bilibop version is 0.4.13 [1]. The git repository [2] is ahead of 2 commits (fix minor errors). Thank you quidame [1]: <http://mentors.debian.net

Bug#675532: RFS: bilibop/0.3.2 (ITP #675467)

2012-06-21 Thread quidame
libop/bilibop_0.3.2.dsc Thanks, quidame -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/efec3b7d2dcc079432bc333161496...@poivron.org

Bug#675532: RFS: bilibop/0.1 (ITP #675467)

2012-06-15 Thread quidame
age that would be used only on Debian. Surely it is entirely possible, but I don't think everything possible must be done. Cheers, quidame -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list

Bug#675532: RFS: bilibop/0.1 (ITP #675467)

2012-06-08 Thread quidame
I'm wrong and I have a bad overview on this issue. Maybe bilibop-lockfs could be only a debian patch. Or what ? Cheers, quidame -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists

Bug#675532: RFS: bilibop/0.1 (ITP #675467)

2012-06-08 Thread quidame
other things, add a new changelog entry and increment the version number (0.2.1) ? In that case, how to deal with the irrelevant or useless informations of the actual changelog ? 3. ? Thanks for your attention quidame -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.o

Bug#675532: Fwd: Re: Bug#675532: RFS: bilibop/0.1 (ITP #675467)

2012-06-07 Thread quidame
ion is available now: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bilibop/bilibop_0.2.dsc Cheers, quidame -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org

Bug#675532: RFS: bilibop/0.1 (ITP #675467)

2012-06-07 Thread quidame
mon's postinst and postrm run update-initramfs? Ooops... yes, this is an error (remaining files from old version). Fixed. The debian/changelog entry must close the ITP bug. OK The debian/rules header about "Sample debian/rules that uses debhelper" should be remov