Bug#707595:

2013-06-25 Thread shuerhaaken
Hello I'd like to point out that releases of xnoise never require vala for building because the release contains the C sources! Usual configure-make-makeinstall works without vala. bug #705677 should not be a blocker for this ITP bug. Regards Jörn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-

Re: RFS: xnoise (2nd try)

2011-07-12 Thread shuerhaaken
Hello Alessandro Ghedini > - you should append something like " (plugins)" to the short description so > that it does not duplicate the description of the main package. Done > - the -plugins package right now Depends on various -dev packages. I do not > think they are needed. Replaced them with

Re: RFS: xnoise (2nd try)

2011-07-11 Thread shuerhaaken
Hello Alessandro > Duh. Makes sense... Some similar packages (e.g. banshee and amarok) are in > "sound", but I can't say what's the best solution. I'll look around what has been chosen for other media players. > That's what Suggests/Recommends are made for. E.g. Rhythmbox Recommends > rhythmb

Re: RFS: xnoise (2nd try)

2011-07-11 Thread shuerhaaken
Hello Alessandro Ghedini, I tried to implement all your points. I reuploaded the packages to debian mentors. I have some comments to your testings, see below: >  + IMHO the Section should be "sound" instead of "x11". "sound" doesn't seem to fit right, because xnoise is a media player and also d

Re: RFS: xnoise

2011-07-06 Thread shuerhaaken
rieb Joachim Wiedorn: > shuerhaaken wrote on 2011-07-06 12:54: > > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > Unfortunately not! Here is my logging (packaging for testing): > > N: Setting up lab in /tmp/sVt1potpnA ... > N: > N: Processing changes file xnoise_0

RFS: xnoise

2011-07-06 Thread shuerhaaken
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xnoise". * Package name: xnoise Version : 0.1.25-1 Upstream Author : Jörn Magens * URL : http://code.google.com/p/xnoise/ * License : GPLv2+ Section : x11 It builds these binary packages: xnois