Re: (2nd try) RFS: Erudite Directory Service Admin

2004-12-22 Thread Mark Roach
On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 18:47 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Mark Roach wrote: [...] > > dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of directory autom4te.cache > > dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file autom4te.cache/traces.0 > > dpkg-source: warning: ignorin

Re: (2nd try) RFS: Erudite Directory Service Admin

2004-12-22 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Mark Roach wrote: > On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 11:41 -0500, Mark Roach wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 23:45 +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > > You can do all of the Debian-specific maintenance in a separate "debian" > > > branch of your revision control system (you do *use* a good

Re: (2nd try) RFS: Erudite Directory Service Admin

2004-12-22 Thread Mark Roach
On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 11:41 -0500, Mark Roach wrote: > On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 23:45 +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > You can do all of the Debian-specific maintenance in a separate "debian" > > branch of your revision control system (you do *use* a good revision control > > system, don't you?) and

Re: (2nd try) RFS: Erudite Directory Service Admin

2004-12-22 Thread Mark Roach
On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 23:45 +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 09:25:43PM -0500, Mark Roach wrote: > > > > These are native packages i.e. The debian packaging info is part of the > > upstream tarball (I am the author). It is my understanding that since > > there is no differenc

Re: (2nd try) RFS: Erudite Directory Service Admin

2004-12-22 Thread Peter Karlsson
Mark Roach: > These are native packages i.e. The debian packaging info is part of > the upstream tarball (I am the author). It is my understanding that > since there is no difference between upstream and packaged versions > no diff is necessary... isn't this right? When I've released upstream sof

Re: (2nd try) RFS: Erudite Directory Service Admin

2004-12-22 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 09:25:43PM -0500, Mark Roach wrote: > On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 17:38 -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 17:28 -0500, Mark Roach wrote: > > > I am the author of EDSAdmin (Erudite Directory Service Admin). It is a > > > python+gtk application that aims for

Re: (2nd try) RFS: Erudite Directory Service Admin

2004-12-21 Thread Mark Roach
On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 22:07 -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote: > On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 21:25 -0500, Mark Roach wrote: > > These are native packages i.e. The debian packaging info is part of the > > upstream tarball (I am the author). It is my understanding that since > > there is no difference betwe

Re: (2nd try) RFS: Erudite Directory Service Admin

2004-12-21 Thread David Moreno Garza
On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 21:25 -0500, Mark Roach wrote: > > You should also provide .diff.gz and .orig.tar.gz files to extract > > source packages. > > These are native packages i.e. The debian packaging info is part of the > upstream tarball (I am the author). It is my understanding that since > the

Re: (2nd try) RFS: Erudite Directory Service Admin

2004-12-21 Thread Mark Roach
On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 17:38 -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote: > On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 17:28 -0500, Mark Roach wrote: > > I am the author of EDSAdmin (Erudite Directory Service Admin). It is a > > python+gtk application that aims for easy maintenance of LDAP > > directories. I have packaged it and wo

Re: (2nd try) RFS: Erudite Directory Service Admin

2004-12-21 Thread David Moreno Garza
On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 17:28 -0500, Mark Roach wrote: > I am the author of EDSAdmin (Erudite Directory Service Admin). It is a > python+gtk application that aims for easy maintenance of LDAP > directories. I have packaged it and would like to see it included in > Debian. > > The homepage is here: h

(2nd try) RFS: Erudite Directory Service Admin

2004-12-21 Thread Mark Roach
I am the author of EDSAdmin (Erudite Directory Service Admin). It is a python+gtk application that aims for easy maintenance of LDAP directories. I have packaged it and would like to see it included in Debian. The homepage is here: http://edsadmin.sourceforge.net/ Debian files here: http://edsadmi