Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 10:03:43PM +0300, Peter Novodvorsky wrote:
And democracy is:
-- you have more money -- you have more power (not rights).
This is capitalism, not democracy. In Debian, capitalism has no place, as
there is no currency, and we don't exchange
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 10:03:43PM +0300, Peter Novodvorsky wrote:
And democracy is:
-- you have more money -- you have more power (not rights).
This is capitalism, not democracy. In Debian, capitalism has no place, as
there is no currency, and we don't exchange
++ 16/01/01 01:41 +1100 - Daniel Stone:
Enter Debian, 2001. Democracy. (Yeah, my arse). NMs aren't allowed to speak
a non-positive word against so-called "senior developers" because they're
just little, unimportant NMs.
Did anyone moderated you from debian-devel? What do you mean by
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 10:03:43PM +0300, Peter Novodvorsky wrote:
And democracy is:
-- you have more money -- you have more power (not rights).
This is capitalism, not democracy. In Debian, capitalism has no place, as
there is no currency, and we don't exchange anything. We only contribute
++ 16/01/01 01:41 +1100 - Daniel Stone:
Enter Debian, 2001. Democracy. (Yeah, my arse). NMs aren't allowed to spe=
ak
a non-positive word against so-called "senior developers" because they're
just little, unimportant NMs.=20
Did anyone moderated you from debian-devel? What do you mean
++ 16/01/01 01:41 +1100 - Daniel Stone:
Enter Debian, 2001. Democracy. (Yeah, my arse). NMs aren't allowed to speak
a non-positive word against so-called senior developers because they're
just little, unimportant NMs.
Did anyone moderated you from debian-devel? What do you mean by
``aren't''
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 10:03:43PM +0300, Peter Novodvorsky wrote:
And democracy is:
-- you have more money -- you have more power (not rights).
This is capitalism, not democracy. In Debian, capitalism has no place, as
there is no currency, and we don't exchange anything. We only contribute and
++ 16/01/01 01:41 +1100 - Daniel Stone:
Enter Debian, 2001. Democracy. (Yeah, my arse). NMs aren't allowed to spe=
ak
a non-positive word against so-called senior developers because they're
just little, unimportant NMs.=20
Did anyone moderated you from debian-devel? What do you mean by
(Joey, this is CC'ed to you because of the DAM bit, please take it to
heart).
As I mentioned before, I have passed all tasks and skills to become a NM, I'm
just waiting DAM approval.
You too? Whacky. Seems to be the tale of virtually every person in the NM
queue I know. Passed PP. Passed TS.
Hi Daniel!
You wrote:
I think Craig (Sanders) summed it up beautifully in his email where he said
that the DAM was a servant-type job, not a master. How would you like it if
a submarine captain just vanished on holiday without telling anyone because
he couldn't be stuffed going on his next
Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They _are_ allowed to speak, of course. They are not allowed to flame.
I don't read NMs that flamed. I only read debian developers who flamed (stop
that shit and the like). The NMs only asked questions, mostly polite.
--
Until the next mail...,
Daniel Stone wrote:
(Joey, this is CC'ed to you because of the DAM bit, please take it to
heart).
As I mentioned before, I have passed all tasks and skills to become a NM, I'm
just waiting DAM approval.
You too? Whacky. Seems to be the tale of virtually every person in the NM
queue
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 04:56:47PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
1) James did post on -private about this
2) The DAM is the one who DECIDES whether you are accepted as a
developer or not. He is not just someone who creates accounts. As a
delegate of the project leader (e.g.
(Joey, this is CC'ed to you because of the DAM bit, please take it to
heart).
As I mentioned before, I have passed all tasks and skills to become a NM, I'm
just waiting DAM approval.
You too? Whacky. Seems to be the tale of virtually every person in the NM
queue I know. Passed PP. Passed TS.
Hi Daniel!
You wrote:
I think Craig (Sanders) summed it up beautifully in his email where he said
that the DAM was a servant-type job, not a master. How would you like it if
a submarine captain just vanished on holiday without telling anyone because
he couldn't be stuffed going on his next
Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They _are_ allowed to speak, of course. They are not allowed to flame.
I don't read NMs that flamed. I only read debian developers who flamed (stop
that shit and the like). The NMs only asked questions, mostly polite.
--
Until the next mail...,
Stefan.
Daniel Stone wrote:
(Joey, this is CC'ed to you because of the DAM bit, please take it to
heart).
As I mentioned before, I have passed all tasks and skills to become a NM,
I'm
just waiting DAM approval.
You too? Whacky. Seems to be the tale of virtually every person in the NM
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 04:56:47PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
1) James did post on -private about this
2) The DAM is the one who DECIDES whether you are accepted as a
developer or not. He is not just someone who creates accounts. As a
delegate of the project leader (e.g.
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 01:01:45PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
[snip]
Joey informed me that he is no longer a DAM, so James is the only one we
have right now. (the NM web pages need to be updated.)
[snip]
if the job is too much for one person, or if James is too busy with
other stuff then we
19 matches
Mail list logo
