On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 02:19:27PM -0400, David Krovich wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So far, it does not seem to have been a problem, but you are welcome to
> > propose it through the normal channels.
>
> Please forgive my ignorance, but what are the proper channels
Stefan Völkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> One question I have however, is should it be a policy violation if a
>> script hangs waiting for user input? Perhaps the policy document
>> should be updated to explicitly deal with this case?
>
> If it does wait on input (or might) it should start af
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So far, it does not seem to have been a problem, but you are welcome to
> propose it through the normal channels.
Please forgive my ignorance, but what are the proper channels to use
in regards to discussion/modification of a policy document?
Post to
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 02:19:27PM -0400, David Krovich wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So far, it does not seem to have been a problem, but you are welcome to
> > propose it through the normal channels.
>
> Please forgive my ignorance, but what are the proper channels
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 11:49:46AM -0400, David Krovich wrote:
> One question I have however, is should it be a policy violation if a
> script hangs waiting for user input? Perhaps the policy document
> should be updated to explicitly deal with this case?
So far, it does not seem to have been a
Stefan Völkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> One question I have however, is should it be a policy violation if a
>> script hangs waiting for user input? Perhaps the policy document
>> should be updated to explicitly deal with this case?
>
> If it does wait on input (or might) it should start af
> > One question I have however, is should it be a policy violation if a
> > script hangs waiting for user input? Perhaps the policy document
> > should be updated to explicitly deal with this case?
>
> If it does wait on input (or might) it should start afte, ssh, pcmcia,
> hotplug and
David Krovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> My server not booting up to the point where ssh is running and accepting
>
> Well, one thing I did make sure was to update the run levels so that
> my package starts after drbd.
Doh,
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So far, it does not seem to have been a problem, but you are welcome to
> propose it through the normal channels.
Please forgive my ignorance, but what are the proper channels to use
in regards to discussion/modification of a policy document?
Post to
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My server not booting up to the point where ssh is running and accepting
Well, one thing I did make sure was to update the run levels so that
my package starts after drbd.
> One question I have however, is should it be a policy violation if a
> script hangs waiting for user input? Perhaps the policy document
> should be updated to explicitly deal with this case?
If it does wait on input (or might) it should start afte, ssh, pcmcia,
hotplug and networking. Thus allo
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is no explicit rule in policy about the interactivity of init scripts
> (you can check this yourself), but I would consider it to be in very poor
> taste unless the stability of the system is at stake (e.g., manual fsck).
There is the potential o
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 11:49:46AM -0400, David Krovich wrote:
> One question I have however, is should it be a policy violation if a
> script hangs waiting for user input? Perhaps the policy document
> should be updated to explicitly deal with this case?
So far, it does not seem to have been a
> > One question I have however, is should it be a policy violation if a
> > script hangs waiting for user input? Perhaps the policy document
> > should be updated to explicitly deal with this case?
>
> If it does wait on input (or might) it should start afte, ssh, pcmcia,
> hotplug and
David Krovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> My server not booting up to the point where ssh is running and accepting
>
> Well, one thing I did make sure was to update the run levels so that
> my package starts after drbd.
Doh,
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My server not booting up to the point where ssh is running and accepting
Well, one thing I did make sure was to update the run levels so that
my package starts after drbd.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
> One question I have however, is should it be a policy violation if a
> script hangs waiting for user input? Perhaps the policy document
> should be updated to explicitly deal with this case?
If it does wait on input (or might) it should start afte, ssh, pcmcia,
hotplug and networking. Thus allo
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is no explicit rule in policy about the interactivity of init scripts
> (you can check this yourself), but I would consider it to be in very poor
> taste unless the stability of the system is at stake (e.g., manual fsck).
There is the potential o
On Tuesday 25 May 2004 03.40, David Krovich wrote:
> I have a question. If an /etc/init.d script hangs indefinately while
> waiting for user input, is this a violation of Debian policy?
My server not booting up to the point where ssh is running and accepting
logins means a 2h journey to get ther
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:40:52PM -0400, David Krovich wrote:
> I have a question. If an /etc/init.d script hangs indefinately while
> waiting for user input, is this a violation of Debian policy?
>
> See BTS #221751 for more information.
There is no explicit rule in policy about the interacti
On Tuesday 25 May 2004 03.40, David Krovich wrote:
> I have a question. If an /etc/init.d script hangs indefinately while
> waiting for user input, is this a violation of Debian policy?
My server not booting up to the point where ssh is running and accepting
logins means a 2h journey to get ther
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:40:52PM -0400, David Krovich wrote:
> I have a question. If an /etc/init.d script hangs indefinately while
> waiting for user input, is this a violation of Debian policy?
>
> See BTS #221751 for more information.
There is no explicit rule in policy about the interacti
I have a question. If an /etc/init.d script hangs indefinately while
waiting for user input, is this a violation of Debian policy?
See BTS #221751 for more information.
I have a question. If an /etc/init.d script hangs indefinately while
waiting for user input, is this a violation of Debian policy?
See BTS #221751 for more information.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
24 matches
Mail list logo
