I demand that Geert Stappers may or may not have written...
[snip]
>find . -name exact-name-of-file | xargs rm -f
> or
>find . -name exact-name-of-file -print0 | xargs -0r rm -f
> can be reduced to
>rm -f exact-name-of-file
They can't: consider what happens when ./foo/exact-name-of-
I demand that Geert Stappers may or may not have written...
[snip]
>find . -name exact-name-of-file | xargs rm -f
> or
>find . -name exact-name-of-file -print0 | xargs -0r rm -f
> can be reduced to
>rm -f exact-name-of-file
They can't: consider what happens when ./foo/exact-name-of-
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Geert Stappers a következőeket írta:
> My message is: avoid surprises from find.
Got the message, thank you for the warning.
However I doubt that upstream will use names like config.guess
for anything other than files which can and should be regenerated
in build phase,
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Geert Stappers a következőeket írta:
> My message is: avoid surprises from find.
Got the message, thank you for the warning.
However I doubt that upstream will use names like config.guess
for anything other than files which can and should be regenerated
in build phase,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:57:17PM +, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> >> A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következõeket írta:
> >> > Two things:
> >> > Does -name config.{log,s
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:27:27PM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Geert Stappers a következõeket írta:
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> > > A levelez?m azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következ?eket írta:
| | | - find . -name
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:57:17PM +, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> >> A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következõeket írta:
> >> > Two things:
> >> > Does -name config.{log,s
Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
>> A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következõeket írta:
>> > Two things:
>> > Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
>> > do for me:
>> []
>> >
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magosányi Árpád wrote:
> A levelez?m azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következ?eket írta:
> > Two things:
> > Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
> > do for me:
> []
> > Never ever use "|xargs rm -f".
> Thank you. Is i
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:27:27PM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Geert Stappers a következõeket írta:
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> > > A levelez?m azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következ?eket írta:
| | | - find . -name
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Geert Stappers a következőeket írta:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> > A levelez?m azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következ?eket írta:
[quoting]
or [1]
find ... -print0 | xargs -0r rm -f
cu andreas
[1] This is a lot f
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következõeket írta:
> > Two things:
> > Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
> > do for me:
> []
> >
> > Never ever use "|xargs rm -f".
>
> Thank you.
Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
>> A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következõeket írta:
>> > Two things:
>> > Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
>> > do for me:
>> []
>> >
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magosányi Árpád wrote:
> A levelez?m azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következ?eket írta:
> > Two things:
> > Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
> > do for me:
> []
> > Never ever use "|xargs rm -f".
> Thank you. Is i
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Geert Stappers a következőeket írta:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> > A levelez?m azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következ?eket írta:
[quoting]
or [1]
find ... -print0 | xargs -0r rm -f
cu andreas
[1] This is a lot f
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következõeket írta:
> > Two things:
> > Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
> > do for me:
> []
> >
> > Never ever use "|xargs rm -f".
>
> Thank you.
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következőeket írta:
> Two things:
> Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
> do for me:
[]
>
> Never ever use "|xargs rm -f".
Thank you. Is it okay now?
--- orig/debian/rules
+++ mod/debian/rules
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
cle
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következőeket írta:
> Two things:
> Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
> do for me:
[]
>
> Never ever use "|xargs rm -f".
Thank you. Is it okay now?
--- orig/debian/rules
+++ mod/debian/rules
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
cle
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:43:46PM +, Magosányi Árpád wrote:
[...]
> + find . -name config.{log,status,cache} |xargs rm -f
[...]
Two things:
Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
do for me:
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/test> touch config.log
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:43:46PM +, Magosányi Árpád wrote:
[...]
> + find . -name config.{log,status,cache} |xargs rm -f
[...]
Two things:
Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
do for me:
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/test> touch config.log
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Zenaan Harkness a következőeket írta:
> Three questions:
> - why are these two files copied in?
Because they are needed for autoconf et al, and in some cases
the upstream version of them is not suitable to build the package on
your system. I had stumbled upon this right
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Zenaan Harkness a következőeket írta:
> Three questions:
> - why are these two files copied in?
Because they are needed for autoconf et al, and in some cases
the upstream version of them is not suitable to build the package on
your system. I had stumbled upon this right
22 matches
Mail list logo
