Hello
I just added the symbol files to one of my packages [1], which provided two C++
libraries.
I solved by hand the build failure for the first on (liblog4tango4).
I would like your opinion about my fix [2]. I am not sure that I did the right
things.
Is seems that a few of the missing symbols
Hi Frédéric,
> I just added the symbol files to one of my packages [1], which provided two
> C++ libraries.
>
> I solved by hand the build failure for the first on (liblog4tango4).
> I would like your opinion about my fix [2]. I am not sure that I did the
> right things.
> Is seems that a few o
Le Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:45:53 +0100,
Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
> - Use the c++ tag to move to human-readable symbols and get rid of problems
> due
> to different name mangling schemes.
yes it is nicer with c++ tag, is there an automatic way to convert a symbol
file to
this human readable f
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:11:47AM +0200, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> It seems that my i386 package contain mmx instructions, is it allow ?
Sadly, no. It must work on a real 80486.
You may have an alternate code path for 80586 and higher, though, and choose
them at runtime.
On amd64 you c
Hi again,
> Le Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:45:53 +0100,
> Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
>
> > - Use the c++ tag to move to human-readable symbols and get rid of problems
> > due
> > to different name mangling schemes.
>
> yes it is nicer with c++ tag, is there an automatic way to convert a symbol
>
Hi Picca (2011.07.29_10:11:47_+0200)
> Is there a link somewhere explaining by examples how to deal with thoses
> MISSING symbols
> or differences of implementations ?
>
> Is there a sort of concatenator script, which take all the build log and
> generate a unique symbol file
> with arch tags ?
Le Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:09:05 +0100,
Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
> Hi again,
>
> > Le Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:45:53 +0100,
> > Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
> >
> > > - Use the c++ tag to move to human-readable symbols and get rid of
> > > problems due
> > > to different name mangling schemes.
>
On 2011-08-01 10:28, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> «...]
>
> BUT, I would like your opinion about a dpkg-gensymbols concern.
> I uploaded this package [1] to obtain the build log and then modify the
> symbol files depending on the arch
> It seems that the patch generated by dpkg-gensymbols dur
Le Mon, 1 Aug 2011 10:35:53 +0200,
Niels Thykier a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Looks like you have architecture (or endian) specific symbols. You
> probably have to make architecture specific symbols files in this case.
> In case you would like to see an example I know of [1], which uses a
> separate sy
Hi,
[...]
> Yes that is why I try to apply the generated patch and it does not work for
> exemple
> this hunk took from the armel architecture
>
[...]
>
> as you can see the patch generated by dpkg-gensymbols can not apply.
> Indeed symbols are not ordered the same way ??? Maybe this is due to
* Michael Tautschnig [110801 11:15]:
> Indeed symbol ordering may vary, but also there is no reason for
> dpkg-gensymbols
> to guarantee a particular ordering. Although dpkg-gensymbols produces a diff,
> this is surely not meant for you to apply directly as a patch: each change
> requires proper
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Indeed symbol ordering may vary, but also there is no reason for
> dpkg-gensymbols
> to guarantee a particular ordering.
Well, dpkg-gensymbols does sort the symbols files. Precisely so that
diff are meaningful. Otherwise they would be useless.
Cod
Le Wed, 3 Aug 2011 08:26:05 +0200,
Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> On Mon, 01 Aug 2011, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > Indeed symbol ordering may vary, but also there is no reason for
> > dpkg-gensymbols
> > to guarantee a particular ordering.
>
> Well, dpkg-gensymbols does sort the symbols files. P
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> What do your mean exactly by sorted ?
>
> sorted using the 'sort' program ?
> sorted like the un-mangled symbols ?
IIRC it's sorted alphabetically on the string that appears in the symbols
file (i.e. un-mangeld symbol in your case). The tags
Le Thu, 4 Aug 2011 08:02:44 +0200,
Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> IIRC it's sorted alphabetically on the string that appears in the symbols
> file (i.e. un-mangeld symbol in your case). The tags are ignored for the
> sort.
>
ok In fact my symbols where alphabetically sorted using the mangled names
15 matches
Mail list logo
