Re: Adoption of a package that doesn't need work (yet)

2007-05-25 Thread François Févotte
Hello, On 5/24/07, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There's no reason to upload unless there's a change to the package needed OK, that's what I thought. That said, you should be subscribed to the PTS for the package, and should make an upload as soon as there is something to fix, eve

Re: Adoption of a package that doesn't need work (yet)

2007-05-24 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Manuel García wrote: > On 5/24/07, François Févotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Hello mentors, > > > >I recently filed ITAs for eukleides[1] and xeukleides[2]. However, > >since there had been a QA upload[3] not long before, I don't have any > >"real" work to do on the packag

Re: Adoption of a package that doesn't need work (yet)

2007-05-24 Thread Manuel García
On 5/24/07, François Févotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello mentors, I recently filed ITAs for eukleides[1] and xeukleides[2]. However, since there had been a QA upload[3] not long before, I don't have any "real" work to do on the package yet. I'm not sure how I should actually adopt these pa

Adoption of a package that doesn't need work (yet)

2007-05-24 Thread François Févotte
Hello mentors, I recently filed ITAs for eukleides[1] and xeukleides[2]. However, since there had been a QA upload[3] not long before, I don't have any "real" work to do on the package yet. I'm not sure how I should actually adopt these packages. Should I make a new package only modifying the ma