On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:06:26 +0200
Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > How come the .dsc file mentions an orig file that is not uploaded? All
> > > files mentioned in the .dsc file must be uploaded. I'm confused.
> >
> > Is there some way of detecting a failed FTP upload and removing
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 10:30:39PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:41:57 +0200
> Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:31:29AM +0200, I wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:42:52PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > >
> > > > However, th
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 10:41:57PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> I have no good explanation for the situation Neil mentioned though. The
> package maintainer must have uploaded a package with an orig tarball.
> But then the orig tarball was changed and an upload without an orig
> tarball was done
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:41:57 +0200
Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:31:29AM +0200, I wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:42:52PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > However, the .dsc file uploaded to m.d.n references a
> > > different .orig.tar.gz:
> >
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:31:29AM +0200, I wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:42:52PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Just had a problem with a package for sponsoring that, AFAICT, could
> > not happen with other repositories that I use, so I'm a tad concerned
> > about how it happened on m.d.n.
On Sunday 15 July 2007, Kel Modderman wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 09:00:44 am Neil Williams wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:31:29 +0200
> >
> > Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:42:52PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > > Is this a result of the need to a
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 09:00:44 am Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:31:29 +0200
>
> Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:42:52PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > Is this a result of the need to allow repeated uploads of packages at
> > > the same versi
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:31:29 +0200
Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:42:52PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Is this a result of the need to allow repeated uploads of packages at
> > the same version?
>
> Actually I don't like the idea of uploading a differen
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:42:52PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Just had a problem with a package for sponsoring that, AFAICT, could
> not happen with other repositories that I use, so I'm a tad concerned
> about how it happened on m.d.n.
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xracer/
>
Just had a problem with a package for sponsoring that, AFAICT, could
not happen with other repositories that I use, so I'm a tad concerned
about how it happened on m.d.n.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xracer/
A package has been uploaded to m.d.n several times during sponsoring
(not
10 matches
Mail list logo
