Bug#1012200: RFS: rush/2.2+dfsg-1.0 [NMU] -- restricted user shell

2022-05-31 Thread Bo YU
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rush": * Package name: rush Version : 2.2+dfsg-1.0 Upstream Author : Sergey Poznyakoff * URL : http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/software/rush/ * License : c

Bug#1012200: RFS: rush/2.2+dfsg-1.0 [NMU] -- restricted user shell

2022-06-01 Thread Bastian Germann
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 12:20:33 +0800 Bo YU wrote: Changes since the last upload: rush (2.2+dfsg-1.0) unstable; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload. * New upstream release (Closes: #1001091) * fix rush FTCBFS (Closes: #929160) * Update Standards-Version to 4.6.1 * drop

Bug#1012200: RFS: rush/2.2+dfsg-1.0 [NMU] -- restricted user shell

2022-06-03 Thread Bastian Germann
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 12:20:33 +0800 Bo YU wrote: * Non-maintainer upload. * New upstream release (Closes: #1001091) There is no need to repack the doc directory anymore since 1.9 changed the license. I have removed the repacking stuff in https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rush/-/commit/ef5

Bug#1012200: RFS: rush/2.2+dfsg-1.0 [NMU] -- restricted user shell

2022-06-03 Thread Bo YU
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 03:49:48PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 12:20:33 +0800 Bo YU wrote: * Non-maintainer upload. * New upstream release (Closes: #1001091) There is no need to repack the doc directory anymore since 1.9 changed the license. I have removed the repa

Bug#1012200: RFS: rush/2.2+dfsg-1.0 [NMU] -- restricted user shell

2022-06-06 Thread Bastian Germann
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 22:37:48 +0800 Bo YU wrote: >What happened to format_security.diff? >Why did you remove it? It should still be valid but maybe needs a rebase. Ok. I got huzz hint when applying the patch and i forget to record it here. That is not the way you should do things: Just dropping