Ganesan R wrote:
> This may be an obvious question. It's not enough to rename the source
> tarball, I'll have to rename the sed-3.52 directory within the tarball and
> create a new tarball. Is this still okay?
You don't really need to do that, there is currently no requirement
about the name of th
Ganesan R wrote:
> This may be an obvious question. It's not enough to rename the source
> tarball, I'll have to rename the sed-3.52 directory within the tarball and
> create a new tarball. Is this still okay?
You don't really need to do that, there is currently no requirement
about the name of t
> "Ganesan" == Ganesan R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can understand the concern. Okay, for now ssed will simply be another
> extra package. Since alternatives is out, the info files are still a problem
> though. Unlike /usr/sbin/sed the info files are split into multiple files
> with cross
> "Ganesan" == Ganesan R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can understand the concern. Okay, for now ssed will simply be another
> extra package. Since alternatives is out, the info files are still a problem
> though. Unlike /usr/sbin/sed the info files are split into multiple files
> with cros
> "Henrique" == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Adam Heath wrote:
>> What you want is dpkg-divert. But I vote against diverting /usr/bin/sed.
> I have to agree with Adam, diverting sed might be dangerous.
> HOWEVER, nothing forbids you to packa
> "Adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 26 Dec 2001, Ganesan R wrote:
>> 1. The source tarball is still called sed (the latest version is
>> sed-3.52.tar.gz). What are my options of dealing with this other than
>> asking upstream to change the source tarball?
> You can rename
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Adam Heath wrote:
> What you want is dpkg-divert. But I vote against diverting /usr/bin/sed.
I have to agree with Adam, diverting sed might be dangerous.
HOWEVER, nothing forbids you to package it simply as ssed for now, then
run very comprehensive regression tests to make s
On 26 Dec 2001, Ganesan R wrote:
> 1. The source tarball is still called sed (the latest version is
>sed-3.52.tar.gz). What are my options of dealing with this other than
>asking upstream to change the source tarball?
You can rename the source tarball when uploading to debian. No problem
> "Henrique" == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Adam Heath wrote:
>> What you want is dpkg-divert. But I vote against diverting /usr/bin/sed.
> I have to agree with Adam, diverting sed might be dangerous.
> HOWEVER, nothing forbids you to pack
> "Adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 26 Dec 2001, Ganesan R wrote:
>> 1. The source tarball is still called sed (the latest version is
>> sed-3.52.tar.gz). What are my options of dealing with this other than
>> asking upstream to change the source tarball?
> You can rename
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Adam Heath wrote:
> What you want is dpkg-divert. But I vote against diverting /usr/bin/sed.
I have to agree with Adam, diverting sed might be dangerous.
HOWEVER, nothing forbids you to package it simply as ssed for now, then
run very comprehensive regression tests to make
On 26 Dec 2001, Ganesan R wrote:
> 1. The source tarball is still called sed (the latest version is
>sed-3.52.tar.gz). What are my options of dealing with this other than
>asking upstream to change the source tarball?
You can rename the source tarball when uploading to debian. No proble
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to mailing-list.debian-devel as well.
> "rganesan" == rganesan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A
> Severity: wishlist
> ssed is a version of sed that supports a few new features, inclu
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to mailing-list.debian-devel as well.
> "rganesan" == rganesan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A
> Severity: wishlist
> ssed is a version of sed that supports a few new features, incl
14 matches
Mail list logo
