Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
> To answer your question, it is appropriate to use libfoo-dev as a
> package name if you intend to only ever support installing one version
> of a -dev package at a time. Since it's easy enough to work things out
> later if you change your mind (
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 03:31:34PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Why is this bug report filed on debhelper, which merely uses whatever
> package names you give it?
Opps, should have been against dh_make, I forgot it isn't part of debhelper.
> See policy 11.3, paragraph 3. I don't know what this li
Sam Clegg wrote:
> Aren't dev packages supposed to contain the SONAME:
>
> libfoo0-dev (rather than libfoo-dev)
>
> And then:
>
> Conflicts: libfoo-dev
> Provides: libfoo-dev
>
> At least this is what the libpkg-guide says.
Why is this bug report filed on debhelper, which merely uses whateve
3 matches
Mail list logo
