Bug#669609: sponsorship-requests: NMU mod-gnutls/0.5.10-1.1

Hi, On 21.04.2012 09:22, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote: > Fixed the isues and uploaded a new version it looks all fine now. Please file a NMU bug so that I can sponsor your upload afterwards. You can use the nmudiff tool to assist you filing such a bug. I would upload to DELAYED/7. -- with kind

Bug#669609: sponsorship-requests: NMU mod-gnutls/0.5.10-1.1

Oke , Fixed the isues and uploaded a new version WIth kind regards, Bas -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Arno Töll [mailto:a...@debian.org] Verzonden: vrijdag 20 april 2012 23:40 Aan: 669...@bugs.debian.org CC: Bas van den Dikkenberg Onderwerp: Bug#669609: sponsorship-requests: NMU mod

Bug#669609: sponsorship-requests: NMU mod-gnutls/0.5.10-1.1

Hi, now, that you've updated your package I finally reviewed it. These are my comments: * Do not set urgency=high. There is no point in doing so unless you fix a critical security issue. * There is an invalid changelog.dch file left over. Please remove it. * Do not modify previous changelog ent

Bug#669609: sponsorship-requests: NMU mod-gnutls/0.5.10-1.1

Hi, On 20.04.2012 22:27, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote: > Do you want me the change the changelog also ? Yes, of course you should mention things you fix in an upload. Moreover, you shouldn't push the standards version in a NMU. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC

Bug#669609: sponsorship-requests: NMU mod-gnutls/0.5.10-1.1

: NMU mod-gnutls/0.5.10-1.1 Hi, On 20.04.2012 22:02, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote: > The nmu is about #497097 I realize that, but I won't NMU a package because of a less severe bug. I will, however, because you accidentally fix a serious bug along (but you don't mention this in the c

Bug#669609: sponsorship-requests: NMU mod-gnutls/0.5.10-1.1

Hi, On 20.04.2012 22:02, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote: > The nmu is about #497097 I realize that, but I won't NMU a package because of a less severe bug. I will, however, because you accidentally fix a serious bug along (but you don't mention this in the changelog, see #667626 and #669476) unless

Bug#669609: sponsorship-requests: NMU mod-gnutls/0.5.10-1.1

: mod-gnu...@packages.debian.org Onderwerp: Bug#669609: sponsorship-requests: NMU mod-gnutls/0.5.10-1.1 owner ! tags +moreinfo thanks Hi Bastiaan, please rework your changelog. Only by reading the changelog I wouldn't know why it would be appropriate to NMU it. Did you try to contac

Bug#669609: sponsorship-requests: NMU mod-gnutls/0.5.10-1.1

owner ! tags +moreinfo thanks Hi Bastiaan, please rework your changelog. Only by reading the changelog I wouldn't know why it would be appropriate to NMU it. Did you try to contact the maintainer? The problem was reported yesterday. On 20.04.2012 14:11, Bastiaan Franciscus van den Dikkenberg wro

Bug#669609: sponsorship-requests: NMU mod-gnutls/0.5.10-1.1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU for package "mod-gnutls" It builds those binary packages: libapache2-mod-gnutls - Apache module for SSL and TLS encryption with GnuTLS To access further information about this package,