Package: sponsorship-requests
Version: RFS: ipset/6.12-1 -- administration tool for kernel IP sets
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ipset"
* Package name: ipset
Version : 6.12-1
Upstream Author : Jozsef Kadlecsik
* URL : h
Package: sponsorship-requests
Followup-For: Bug #672394
Dear mentors,
As the upstream releases the new version 6.12.1 of ipset for the
build system bug fix that including my proposed patch.
Therefore, I'm working on this and will upload the new updated package
soon.
Best regards,
Neutron S
Package: sponsorship-requests
Followup-For: Bug #672394
Dckage: sponsorship-requests
Version: RFS: ipset/6.12.1-1 -- administration tool for kernel IP sets
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ipset"
* Package name: ipset
Version : 6.12.1-1
tags 672394 + moreinfo
owner 672394 !
thanks
Hi Neutrom,
this is a review of your package ipset.
* Do not set "DM-Upload-Allowed: yes" on your own. It's your sponsor's
domain to do so. It's hard enough to find sponsors as is, no need to
scare off even more potential sponsors by adding DMUA for p
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:51:40AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
Hi,
>
> this is a review of your package ipset.
>
> * Do not set "DM-Upload-Allowed: yes" on your own. It's your sponsor's
> domain to do so. It's hard enough to find sponsors as is, no need to
> scare off even more potential sponsors by
On Tue, 15 May 2012, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
> > * Are you sure about the location of the binary in the file system?
> > iptables is in /sbin, why do you install ipset to /usr/sbin?
>
> The ipset depends on libmnl which it is installed in /usr/lib or
> /usr/lib/[arch triplet] if it willing support
Hi,
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2012, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
>> > * Are you sure about the location of the binary in the file system?
>> > iptables is in /sbin, why do you install ipset to /usr/sbin?
>>
>> The ipset depends on libmnl which
Hi Arno,
On 15 May 2012 08:51, Arno Töll wrote:
> * You declare the debhelper compat[ibility] to be 9, but you build
> depend on "debhelper (>= 9)". Please use a version which actually
> supports the finalized level 9. That is 9.20120115.
No need to impose this requirement because non-finalized
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 672394 + moreinfo
Bug #672394 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ipset/6.12.1-1 -- administration tool
for kernel IP sets
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> owner 672394 !
Bug #672394 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ipset/6.12.1-1 -- administration tool
for ker
9 matches
Mail list logo
