Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-07-09 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
retitle 678992 grive/0.2.0-1 [ITP #675310] thanks Forget about all the patches mess. Upstream has released 0.2.0 version, which makes unnecessary to apply all those patches. I just uploaded it to mentors.debian.net [1]. Please, feel free to comment here or in the grive's page on

Processed: Re: Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-07-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 678992 grive/0.2.0-1 [ITP #675310] Bug #678992 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: grive/0.1.1-1 [ITP #675310] Changed Bug title to 'grive/0.2.0-1 [ITP #675310]' from 'RFS: grive/0.1.1-1 [ITP #675310]' thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-07-09 Thread Benoît Knecht
José Luis Segura Lucas wrote: Forget about all the patches mess. Upstream has released 0.2.0 version, which makes unnecessary to apply all those patches. I just uploaded it to mentors.debian.net [1]. Please, feel free to comment here or in the grive's page on mentors.debian.net any issue

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-28 Thread Benoît Knecht
José Luis Segura Lucas wrote: El 27/06/12 12:48, Benoît Knecht escribió: I just meant that you should use something like opts=dversionmangle (see uscan(1)) so that uscan would remove the +20120619git27g55c0f4e part before comparing the debian version with the upstream one. But if you're

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-28 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
Hi! I had contacted upstream author and I get a good response from him: 1.- I can remove Matchman Green from the copyright file. 2.- I added libcppunit-dev as build-depend and the test suite is built now, but never executed. As we suspect, make test doesn't work. Which rule on debian/rules must

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-28 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
El 28/06/12 09:12, Benoît Knecht escribió: Actually, Boris' suggestion (cherry-picking the changes you need and including them as patches) is even better, you should consider doing that and dropping the +20120619git27g55c0f4e entirely. Ok, I just seen it. I will make the changes ASAP before

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-28 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
El 28/06/12 09:16, José Luis Segura Lucas escribió: I have only a questions before uploading the package again to mentors.debian.net: which rule I must override on debian/rules to execute the unit tests? Best regards I can answer myself: overriding the rule dh_auto_test. I had worked into

Re: Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-28 Thread Andreas Rütten
Am Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:57:30 +0200 schrieb José Luis Segura Lucas josel.seg...@gmx.es: [...] P.S. After uploading to mentors.debian.net I have seen a lintian informational warning (missing headers on the quilt patches). I describe it in a few words, but after a debuild -S -sd I tried dput

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-28 Thread Benoît Knecht
José Luis Segura Lucas wrote: El 28/06/12 09:16, José Luis Segura Lucas escribió: I have only a questions before uploading the package again to mentors.debian.net: which rule I must override on debian/rules to execute the unit tests? Best regards I can answer myself: overriding the

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-28 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
El 28/06/12 23:47, Benoît Knecht escribió: The idea was to pick only the specific diffs that solved issues, rather that including all the changes up to that git revision. Yes, it was my first idea too, but I tried to only retrieve the Cmake-stuff, the newer MD5 implementation (without linking

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-27 Thread Boris Pek
Hi, The upstream authors doesn't have this version available as tarball for download, I had to create the tarball myself. The main differences between the 0.1.1 stable version and this git commit is only about the construct system: I have made some suggestions and they included it in the

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-27 Thread Benoît Knecht
José Luis Segura Lucas wrote: El 26/06/12 17:36, Benoît Knecht wrote: I took a look at your package: First of all, thanks for your quick answer :-) You're welcome :) - Since you're packaging a snapshot version, you should adjust your watch file accordingly: Processing

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-27 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
El 27/06/12 12:48, Benoît Knecht escribió: I just meant that you should use something like opts=dversionmangle (see uscan(1)) so that uscan would remove the +20120619git27g55c0f4e part before comparing the debian version with the upstream one. But if you're not going to package snapshot

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-26 Thread Benoît Knecht
severity 678992 wishlist thanks Hi José, José Luis Segura Lucas wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package grive * Package name: grive Version : 0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 Upstream Author : Matchman Green match...@gmail.com and Nestal Wan m...@nestal.net *

Processed: Re: Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 678992 wishlist Bug #678992 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310] Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 678992:

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-26 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
El 26/06/12 17:36, Benoît Knecht wrote: I took a look at your package: First of all, thanks for your quick answer :-) - Since you're packaging a snapshot version, you should adjust your watch file accordingly: Processing watchfile line for package grive... Newest version on

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-25 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package grive * Package name: grive Version : 0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 Upstream Author : Matchman Green match...@gmail.com and Nestal Wan m...@nestal.net * URL :