On Sep 18, 2012, at 00:39, Arno Toell a...@wavecon.de wrote:
thanks for your work. I've just sponsored your package. You may have
gotten a notification by dak. Note, that the package is NEW - meaning it
needs to be manually approved by a ftp-master. Please note this could
take a while
On Sep 13, 2012, at 01:42, Arno Toell li...@toell.net wrote:
Your version is acceptable as it is larger than 0.9.21.dfsg-4. It might
be ugly a bit dangerous and misleading, but it is feasible in your case.
That said I realize this is not your fault, so let's deal with it. If
upstream ever
Hi,
On 11.09.2012 16:48, Eugene Seliverstov wrote:
I prefered .dfsg variant for consistent versioning. Repackaging original
tarball
with removing PDF files leads to use of 'dfsg1' prefix so now full version is
'0.9.21.dfsg1-1'.
Your version is acceptable as it is larger than 0.9.21.dfsg-4.
On Sep 5, 2012, at 03:09, Arno Töll a...@debian.org wrote:
tags 686679 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Eugene,
this is a review of your package.
Hello, Arno,
Thank you a lot for your time and explantations!
Please review my next upload at
Hi Eugene,
On 05.09.2012 14:45, Eugene Seliverstov wrote:
I have some questions about versioning scheme.
Package is based on latest 0.9.21.dfsg-4 and includes all of these changes.
But I reseted (maybe incorrectly) a numbering due to use '+dfsg' prefix
instead of '.dfsg'.
1. Is it okay to
Arno Toell a...@wavecon.de writes:
Yes, using +dfsg is acceptable. I haven't checked it, but I'm pretty
sure that the +dfsg variant is more common. That said, keep in mind that
using + or . is not only a stylistic question. It also makes a
difference sometimes.
+dfsg is preferred over .dfsg
On Sep 5, 2012, at 03:09, Arno Töll a...@debian.org wrote:
tags 686679 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Eugene,
On 04.09.2012 18:23, Eugene Seliverstov wrote:
A package asn1c was previously maintained by W. Martin Borgert
deba...@debian.org
but it was removed from testing and unstable
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package asn1c
* Package name: asn1c
Version : 0.9.21+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Lev Walkin v...@lionet.info
* URL : http://asn1c.sourceforge.net
* License :
tags 686679 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Eugene,
On 04.09.2012 18:23, Eugene Seliverstov wrote:
A package asn1c was previously maintained by W. Martin Borgert
deba...@debian.org
but it was removed from testing and unstable distributions due to lack of
adopters.
Current package is based on
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 686679 + moreinfo
Bug #686679 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: asn1c/0.9.21+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- ASN.1
compiler for C
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
686679:
10 matches
Mail list logo