Salut!
On Tuesday 16 October 2012 07:01:11 Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 October 2012 19:59:11 Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> * I don't see the point of including session dumps - especially 4MB of
> them !
> >>> Absolutely. Done.
> >>> I did not change the orig tarball howeve
Hello,
Sorry, completely forgot about that...
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Jean-Michel Vourgère
wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 October 2012 19:59:11 Vincent Fourmond wrote:
* I don't see the point of including session dumps - especially 4MB of
them !
>>> Absolutely. Done.
>>> I di
Salut
On Wednesday 10 October 2012 19:59:11 Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>>> * I don't see the point of including session dumps - especially 4MB of
>>> them !
>> Absolutely. Done.
>> I did not change the orig tarball however. Right?
>
> Hmmm... I'm unsure about that, since the copyright status of
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
> Hello and thank you very much for your review!
>
> On Sunday 07 October 2012 09:09:28 Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> * I'd prefer the package to target experimental as of now; upload to
>> unstable will follow the release of wheezy
>
> It
Hello and thank you very much for your review!
On Sunday 07 October 2012 09:09:28 Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> * I'd prefer the package to target experimental as of now; upload to
> unstable will follow the release of wheezy
It makes sense. Done.
> * I don't see the point of including session d
Hello !
Here are my comments on the eyefiserver package, as it is now.
I don't have any means to check it works fine on my system, as I
lack the corresponding hardware.
There are several minor details to fix:
* I'd prefer the package to target experimental as of now; upload to
unstabl
6 matches
Mail list logo
