Bug#692923: RFS: chrony/1.24-3.2 [RC, NMU]

2012-11-10 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "chrony" (NMU). * Package name: chrony Version : 1.24-3.2 Upstream Author : Richard Curnow * URL : http://chrony.tuxfamily.org/ * License : GPL-2

Bug#692923: RFS: chrony/1.24-3.2 [RC, NMU]

2012-11-10 Thread David Prévot
Le 10/11/2012 17:10, Joachim Wiedorn a écrit : > chrony (1.24-3.2) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=medium Please use 1.24-3.1+deb7u1 as a version number (and eventually directly “wheezy” instead of “testing-proposed-updates”). Since packages meant to testing-proposed-updates should be acknowl

Bug#692923: RFS: chrony/1.24-3.2 [RC, NMU]

2012-11-11 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello David, David Prévot wrote on 2012-11-10 17:40: > Please use 1.24-3.1+deb7u1 as a version number (and eventually directly > “wheezy” instead of “testing-proposed-updates”). Since packages meant to > testing-proposed-updates should be acknowledged by the release team > prior to the upload, pl

Bug#692923: RFS: chrony/1.24-3.2 [RC, NMU]

2012-11-11 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Le 11/11/2012 09:00, Joachim Wiedorn a écrit : > David Prévot wrote on 2012-11-10 17:40: > >> Please use 1.24-3.1+deb7u1 as a version number (and eventually directly >> “wheezy” instead of “testing-proposed-updates”). > That's confusing me. L

Bug#692923: RFS: chrony/1.24-3.2 [RC, NMU]

2012-11-11 Thread David Prévot
Le 10/11/2012 17:10, Joachim Wiedorn a écrit : >RTC support (solves #642209 for version 1.24). Closes: #642209 It should be “Closes: #691340”. Regards David signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#692923: RFS: chrony/1.24-3.2 [RC, NMU]

2012-11-14 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi Joachim, On 2012-11-10 22:10, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: > chrony (1.24-3.2) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=medium > > * Non-maintainer upload. > * Fix: Remove obsolete test of kernel version (rtc_linux.c) to run for >kernel versions 3.0 and higher. Nowadays all kernel versions ha

Bug#692923: RFS: chrony/1.24-3.2 [RC, NMU]

2012-11-15 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Eugene, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote on 2012-11-14 19:08: > Just like Timo said, this patch doesn't fix this (RC) problem. Fix would > be: either apply the same idea (#if 0) to sys_linux.c or backport the > upstream patch [1]. I have thought the problem in sys_linux.c were already solved. I w