Bug#711855: RFS: aircrack-ng/1:1.1-6

2013-06-11 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 12/06/13 03:28, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 03:10 +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: > >> Which package contains such oui file? Is there any package shipping >> generic oui files to be shared or is every package shipping just his own >> oui file? > > None yet, all packages t

Bug#711855: RFS: aircrack-ng/1:1.1-6

2013-06-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 03:10 +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: > Which package contains such oui file? Is there any package shipping > generic oui files to be shared or is every package shipping just his own > oui file? None yet, all packages that need it ship a copy of it, possibly in a di

Bug#711855: RFS: aircrack-ng/1:1.1-6

2013-06-11 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 11/06/13 02:47, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: > >> I'm not sure if beta versions are welcome on Debian or should be avoided >> if possible. My understanding is that it should be avoided if possible. > > The main thing is that packages up

Bug#711855: RFS: aircrack-ng/1:1.1-6

2013-06-10 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: > I'm not sure if beta versions are welcome on Debian or should be avoided > if possible. My understanding is that it should be avoided if possible. The main thing is that packages uploaded to unstable are destined for the next D

Bug#711855: RFS: aircrack-ng/1:1.1-6

2013-06-10 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 10/06/13 14:50, أحمد المحمودي wrote: > Hello, > > Why not work on aircrack-ng 1.2~beta1 instead ? > That's a good question. I'm not sure if beta versions are welcome on Debian or should be avoided if possible. My understanding is that it should be avoided if possible. I was thinking in up

Bug#711855: RFS: aircrack-ng/1:1.1-6

2013-06-10 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 10/06/13 15:18, أحمد المحمودي wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 02:12:02PM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: >> * Remove unused Build-Depends on obsolete libnl-dev (Closes: #688158) > ---end quoted text--- > > Why is netlink support disabled ? > 1.1 don't supports netlink. Only 1.2

Bug#711855: RFS: aircrack-ng/1:1.1-6

2013-06-10 Thread أحمد المحمودي
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 02:12:02PM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: > * Remove unused Build-Depends on obsolete libnl-dev (Closes: #688158) ---end quoted text--- Why is netlink support disabled ? -- ‎أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) Digital design engineer GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7

Bug#711855: RFS: aircrack-ng/1:1.1-6

2013-06-10 Thread أحمد المحمودي
Hello, Why not work on aircrack-ng 1.2~beta1 instead ? -- ‎أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) Digital design engineer GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7 GPG Fingerprint: 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8 B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#711855: RFS: aircrack-ng/1:1.1-6

2013-06-10 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aircrack-ng" * Package name: aircrack-ng Version : 1:1.1-6 Upstream Author : Thomas d'Otreppe * URL : http://www.aircrack-ng.org * License : GPL-