Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-02-03 Thread Joseph Herlant
Dear Vincent, > One last nitpick (sorry!) is that other gnome-shell extensions > packaged in Debian seem to prefix their packages with > "gnome-shell-extension-" (e.g. gnome-shell-extension-weather, > gnome-shell-extension-autohidetopbar), so can you please do the same > for your binary package a

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-02-02 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Joseph Herlant wrote: > Dear Vincent, > > I first understood that I needed --with quilt and then lintian was > complaining about a missing build-dep for quilt. That's why I added > them. > But I doubled checked, tested on the package and you're right I don't > need

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-02-02 Thread Joseph Herlant
Dear Vincent, I first understood that I needed --with quilt and then lintian was complaining about a missing build-dep for quilt. That's why I added them. But I doubled checked, tested on the package and you're right I don't need this! <:-) That's great, I removed them. Yep, you guessed why pri

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-02-01 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote: > Hi Vincent, > > Thanks for this advice. :-) > > I chose to use the patching approach because I found it cleaner (and > wanted to play with quilt once again!). > I recreated the package from the upstream 0.8 tag and used quilt to > integrate

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-30 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi Vincent, Thanks for this advice. :-) I chose to use the patching approach because I found it cleaner (and wanted to play with quilt once again!). I recreated the package from the upstream 0.8 tag and used quilt to integrate the fixes in one patch. Package have been uploaded to mentors. Please

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-29 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote: > retitle 728059 RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.8.0-1 [ITP] > thanks > > > Dear Vincent, > > Thanks a lot for your advises and your time. > > > >> Yes, use "all" instead. "any" will cause your package to be compiled >> on all Debian release arch

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-29 Thread Joseph Herlant
retitle 728059 RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.8.0-1 [ITP] thanks Dear Vincent, Thanks a lot for your advises and your time. > Yes, use "all" instead. "any" will cause your package to be compiled > on all Debian release architectures and introduce different binary > packages of gnome-shell-pomodo

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-27 Thread Vincent Cheng
Hi Joseph, On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote: >> - Why "Architecture: any" if there aren't any arch-specific files in >> your package? > > As it means any architecture supported by debian and that it is the "most > frequently used" regarding debina policy 5.6.8. I thought it

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-20 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi Vincent, Thanks for the quick answer. > How is this different from gnome-shell-timer, which is already > packaged in debian? The difference is that it uses pomodoro technique. It's not just a timer. For more information about the pomodoro technique, you can begin with the readme of the packag

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-17 Thread Vincent Cheng
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Joseph Herlant wrote: > Hi Vincent, > > Thanks for the suggestion for the usage of the Breaks keyword. I personally > prefer to do as the gnome-shell-extensions do which is adding "gnome-shell > (>= 3.8), gnome-shell (<< 3.9)" to the packa

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-17 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi Vincent, Thanks for the suggestion for the usage of the Breaks keyword. I personally prefer to do as the gnome-shell-extensions do which is adding "gnome-shell (>= 3.8), gnome-shell (<< 3.9)" to the package. I'll update the package accordingly for the next release. For the integration of the g

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-17 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > > Dear mentors, > > I repackaged the gnome-shell-pomodoro to support gnome-shell-3.8 (to > work with unstable). > > I am now looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-shell-pomodoro" >

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2013-10-30 Thread Joseph Herlant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I repackaged the gnome-shell-pomodoro to support gnome-shell-3.8 (to work with unstable). I am now looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-shell-pomodoro" * Package name: gnome-shell-pomodoro Version : 0.8.0-1 U

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1

2013-10-29 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi, It seems the version I packaged is ONLY compatible gnome-shell 3.4, so it won't work in unstable (see discussion on debian-mentors list). I tested the package in Debain testing and it worked fine, but I'll will redo the package for the unstable version (gnome-shell 3.8). In the mean time, plea

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1

2013-10-27 Thread Joseph Herlant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-shell-pomodoro" * Package name: gnome-shell-pomodoro Version : 0.6.20131027-1 Upstream Author : Arun Mahapatra and Kamil Prusko * URL : https://github.co