Elmar Stellnberger writes:
> Am 12.11.2013 10:24, schrieb Andrew Shadura:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 12 November 2013 10:22, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
>>> O.K. That is actually what is to be done next.
>>> There are some people whom I know and who I am going to consult.
>>> It will at last be necessary
Am 12.11.2013 10:24, schrieb Andrew Shadura:
Hello,
On 12 November 2013 10:22, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
O.K. That is actually what is to be done next.
There are some people whom I know and who I am going to consult.
It will at last be necessary in my very own interest to assert that the
lice
Hello,
On 12 November 2013 10:22, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> O.K. That is actually what is to be done next.
> There are some people whom I know and who I am going to consult.
> It will at last be necessary in my very own interest to assert that the
> license will work in practice as intended.
>
O.K. That is actually what is to be done next.
There are some people whom I know and who I am going to consult.
It will at last be necessary in my very own interest to assert that the
license will work in practice as intended.
I hope you are going to accept the results if and only if I consult
som
Hi Elmar,
It's OK that you write your own non-free license, but this license in
particular has, in my opinion, too many serious flaws to allow it in section
non-free. I suggest to get professional legal advice or to use an existing
well-known license.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
5 matches
Mail list logo
