Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 04-07-14 22:31, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > (#752833), it is pointless to upload without a fixed -make.
gnustep-make was uploaded, but nevertheless thanks very much for the
review.
> While looking at gnustep-make, I noticed the following:
> gnustep-make: Possible OpenPGP sign
Paul Gevers wrote:
> I can't promise that I will upload the package, but if you can push your
> changes to the packaging git I promise that I will have a look.
Thanks. The changes are pushed as you have noticed, but -gui depends
on gnustep-base/1.24.6 so that has to be uploaded first, and since i
On 04-07-14 22:01, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I can't promise that I will upload the package, but if you can push your
> changes to the packaging git I promise that I will have a look.
Never mind, I was fooled by the web interface of gitweb [1], which
didn't show the changes of the experimental branch.
Hi Yavor,
On 27-05-14 02:57, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnustep-gui".
I can't promise that I will upload the package, but if you can push your
changes to the packaging git I promise that I will have a look. (I
prefer the git over just the package as it makes
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Control: block -1 with 749142
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnustep-gui". There are a
lot of lintian errors about GFDL invariant sections due to what I
believe is a bug in lintian (nothing changed upstream).
It builds the
5 matches
Mail list logo
