Uploaded. Thanks for your work.
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-11-07 10:33 GMT-02:00 Pierre Rudloff :
> Hello,
>
> This is your first answer to my last email and I still need a sponsor for
> this package.
> Thanks for your time.
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> On 07/11/2014 13:21, Eriberto wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I
Hello,
This is your first answer to my last email and I still need a sponsor
for this package.
Thanks for your time.
Regards,
On 07/11/2014 13:21, Eriberto wrote:
Hi,
I am lost in my time and my emails. So, I would like to know if I
replied you before and if you needs a sponsor yet.
Sorry
Hi,
I am lost in my time and my emails. So, I would like to know if I
replied you before and if you needs a sponsor yet.
Sorry for my delay.
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-10-16 18:42 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff :
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for not answering before, I had quite a lot of work.
> I have upadated t
Hello,
Sorry for not answering before, I had quite a lot of work.
I have upadated the package as you asked:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/lutris
Regards,
Le 19/09/2014 12:42, Eriberto a écrit :
Hi Pierre,
You is very very near an upload.
Note that file data/ui/about-dialog.ui is GPL-3
Hi Pierre,
You is very very near an upload.
Note that file data/ui/about-dialog.ui is GPL-3+ (not GPL-3). So, you
need to create a section for this file in d/copyright.
Considering that you need to modify the copyright file, I will make a
new request for you. Please, add a reference about you, D
It is on mentors : https://mentors.debian.net/package/lutris
Regards,
2014-09-19 1:40 GMT+02:00 Eriberto Mota :
> Please, upload your package to mentors.d.n. It makes easier the review
> and, maybe final, tests. Thanks.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Eriberto
>
> Em quinta-feira, 18 de setembro de 2014, Pierre
Please, upload your package to mentors.d.n. It makes easier the review and,
maybe final, tests. Thanks.
Cheers,
Eriberto
Em quinta-feira, 18 de setembro de 2014, Pierre Rudloff
escreveu:
> Oh OK, I did not see there was some files by different auhtors in the
> tarball.
>
> I added them to the
Oh OK, I did not see there was some files by different auhtors in the
tarball.
I added them to the copyright file:
https://github.com/Rudloff/lutris-debian/commit/aa24f3a5b4f865cf9eb00f6746ce199eca0f0147
Thanks again for your help!
Regards,
Le 18/09/2014 01:42, Eriberto a écrit :
Hi,
2014
No problem, I have removed the file:
https://github.com/Rudloff/lutris-debian/commit/b67bc142472947090998c87ea058cffc5209be3c
Le 18/09/2014 14:29, Eriberto a écrit :
Hi Andrey and Pierre,
Hum... It is new for me. I tested here with lutris and works fine. In
old years, I would get a warning abo
Hi Andrey and Pierre,
Hum... It is new for me. I tested here with lutris and works fine. In
old years, I would get a warning about changes in upstream code.
Thanks for your help Andrey.
Pierre, sorry for my mistake and waste of time. Please, remove the
README.source.
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-09
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 05:12:54PM -0300, Eriberto wrote:
> > 6. I have added a generic README.source about quilt. Is this OK?
> No. My idea was talk about the original debian directory removed from
> upstream code.
The original debian/ is removed by dpkg-source when unpacking 3.0 (quilt)
packages,
Hi,
2014-09-17 17:41 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff :
>>> 3.
>>> - I am not sure I understand. It does use the 1.0 format.
>>> - Where should I list the upstream authors? I don't see a field
>>> for
>>> this in the 1.0 format.
>>
>>
>>
>> You can consult any copyright in Debian package
Hello,
Le 17/09/2014 22:12, Eriberto a écrit :
Hi Pierre,
2014-09-16 16:13 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff :
2.
- Done.
Please, read again my instructions in item 2 in last mail. You didn't
changed the Depends field.
Sorry, I changed the Build-Depends field and forgot the Depends field.
OK, I removed it. Thanks!
Le 17/09/2014 05:11, Andrey Rahmatullin a écrit :
README.source is not needed if you don't repack the upstream tarball and use
dpkg to apply patches. See
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-readmesource
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-
Hi Pierre,
2014-09-16 16:13 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff :
> 2.
> - Done.
Please, read again my instructions in item 2 in last mail. You didn't
changed the Depends field.
> - My work is now on GitHub: https://github.com/Rudloff/lutris-debian
> GitHub uses the same URL for browser
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 09:13:01PM +0200, Pierre Rudloff wrote:
> - My work is now on GitHub: https://github.com/Rudloff/lutris-debian
> GitHub uses the same URL for browser and git clone, you should I still fill
> both fields?
Of course, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-control
Thanks for your help. I have updated the package on mentors.
1. Done.
2.
- Done.
- Done.
- Done.
- My work is now on GitHub: https://github.com/Rudloff/lutris-debian
GitHub uses the same URL for browser and git clone, you should I still
fill both fields?
- You c
Hi wRAR,
You need analyze the package to understand my words. Pierre, the
maintainer, already understood and replied me.
Thanks for your help and attention.
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-09-16 0:11 GMT-03:00 Andrey Rahmatullin :
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:22:10PM -0300, Eriberto wrote:
>> To put a
Hi Pierre,
Thanks for your fast reply. I will try help you.
1. d/changelog: please, use 'Initial release' instead of 'source
package automatically created by stdeb 0.6.0+git'.
2. d/control:
- Change the Priority from extra to optional[1].
- The upstream INSTALL file says that you must
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:22:10PM -0300, Eriberto wrote:
> To put a package in Debian you must remove the debian/ directory from
> upstream source code and generate a new tarball. So, you must start a
> new Debian package. You can use some ideas from upstream, not clone
> the code only.
I see seve
Hello,
Sorry, I thought it was better to reuse an existing package.
I have rebuilt it from scratch: http://mentors.debian.net/package/lutris
Here are the answers to your questions:
1. It does not use it anymore.
2. I have set it to 9, which seems to be the current level.
3. It isn't a game but a
Hi Pierre,
I checked your package and you are using/cloning the original upstream
packaging.
To put a package in Debian you must remove the debian/ directory from
upstream source code and generate a new tarball. So, you must start a
new Debian package. You can use some ideas from upstream, not cl
Hello,
I have fixed every Lintian warning except those which depend on upstream:
no-upstream-changelog
debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature
and these two which look like false positives:
desktop-mime-but-no-exec-code
package-contains-timestamped-gzip
Regards,
Le 13/09/2014 18:54, Eriberto a éc
Hi Pierre,
You have several important messages yet. If you don
2014-09-13 12:48 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff :
> Hello,
>
> I fixed the errors and some of the warnings and reuploaded the package.
>
> Regards,
>
> Le 18/08/2014 04:13, Eriberto Mota a écrit :
>
>> tags 757966 moreinfo
>> thanks
>>
>> H
Hi Pierre,
You have several important messages yet[1]. If you don't fix it, will
be very hard get a sponsor.
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/lutris
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-09-13 13:53 GMT-03:00 Eriberto :
> Hi Pierre,
>
> You have several important messages yet. If you don
>
> 2014-09-13
Hello,
I fixed the errors and some of the warnings and reuploaded the package.
Regards,
Le 18/08/2014 04:13, Eriberto Mota a écrit :
tags 757966 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Pierre,
I saw your package in mentors.debian.org and it has several Lintian messages.
IMHO, to get a sponsor you must, at least
tags 757966 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Pierre,
I saw your package in mentors.debian.org and it has several Lintian messages.
IMHO, to get a sponsor you must, at least, clear your package removing
all possible messages.
Regards,
Eriberto
2014-08-12 17:04 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff :
> Package: sponsorsh
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lutris"
* Package name: lutris
Version : 0.3.4-1
Upstream Author : Mathieu Comandon
* URL : https://lutris.net/
* License : GPLv3
Section
28 matches
Mail list logo
