Bug#790391: RFS: bomberclone/0.11.9-5 ITA

2015-06-30 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Mittwoch, den 01.07.2015, 00:14 +0200 schrieb Peter Spiess-Knafl: Hi Tobi! Thanks for taking the time of reviewing. just minor remarks: -changelog entry d/control: migrated from cdbs to dh9 implies that changes are only in d/control, maybe remove d/control. - I'm a fan of DEP3

Bug#790391: RFS: bomberclone/0.11.9-5 ITA

2015-06-30 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags: -1 pending Am Sonntag, den 28.06.2015, 21:48 +0200 schrieb Peter Spiess-Knafl: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package bomberclone * Package name: bomberclone Version

Bug#790391: RFS: bomberclone/0.11.9-5 ITA

2015-06-30 Thread Tobias Frost
Hi Peter, just minor remarks: -changelog entry d/control: migrated from cdbs to dh9 implies that changes are only in d/control, maybe remove d/control. - I'm a fan of DEP3 style patch headers :) Maybe you can tweak your headers? For example this would avoid this question: Did you send upstream

Bug#790391: RFS: bomberclone/0.11.9-5 ITA

2015-06-30 Thread Peter Spiess-Knafl
Hi Tobi! Thanks for taking the time of reviewing. just minor remarks: -changelog entry d/control: migrated from cdbs to dh9 implies that changes are only in d/control, maybe remove d/control. - I'm a fan of DEP3 style patch headers :) Maybe you can tweak your headers? For example this

Bug#790391: RFS: bomberclone/0.11.9-5 ITA

2015-06-28 Thread Peter Spiess-Knafl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package bomberclone * Package name: bomberclone Version : 0.11.9-5 Upstream Author : Steffen Pohle stef...@bomberclone.de *