On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 13:13 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> That's also what I understand since you wrote that upfront. Sorry if I
> sounded rude :-/ I was merely arguing in case a potential sponsor would
> wait for me to fix these before stepping forward ;-)
I see, thanks for the clarification.
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 at 11:37:39 +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
>> not a reason for rejection
>
> Not being willing to sponsor the package isn't a rejection, just an
> indicator that I don't have time for a proper initial review and
> ongoing sponso
2 matches
Mail list logo
