Bug#807763: Looking for help to solve licence and third-party issues of the tomahawk-player package

2016-05-23 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Hi Stefan, On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:48:37PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi sorry for the late answer, it took a while to have time to dig into the > issue. Did anything happen here in the past 2,5 months? -- regards, Mattia Riz

Bug#807763: Looking for help to solve licence and third-party issues of the tomahawk-player package

2016-03-03 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi sorry for the late answer, it took a while to have time to dig into the issue. >I'm confused, on a Ubuntu 16.04 clean environment everything works fine >with multiarch support but on debian sid it does not work. >(https://launchpadlibrarian.net/240678247/tomahawk-p

Bug#807763: Looking for help to solve licence and third-party issues of the tomahawk-player package

2016-02-21 Thread Stefan Ahlers
Hey, > Hi again, it doesn't build on clean environment > http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/tomahawk-player/0.8.4-1/buildlog I'm confused, on a Ubuntu 16.04 clean environment everything works fine with multiarch support but on debian sid it does not work. (https://launchpadli

Bug#807763: Looking for help to solve licence and third-party issues of the tomahawk-player package

2016-02-17 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi again, it doesn't build on clean environment http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/tomahawk-player/0.8.4-1/buildlog Il Mercoledì 17 Febbraio 2016 16:07, Gianfranco Costamagna ha scritto: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, > Could you review the tomahawk

Bug#807763: Looking for help to solve licence and third-party issues of the tomahawk-player package

2016-02-17 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, > Could you review the tomahawk-player package again? I know, there > is much more work needs tobedone. It would be great, if you could > check my answers of the first review and points out what I have to > do next, which thirdparty code I have

Bug#807763: Looking for help to solve licence and third-party issues of the tomahawk-player package

2016-02-13 Thread Stefan Ahlers
Hi, jreen is accepted, now. Could you review the tomahawk-player package again? I know, there is much more work needs tobedone. It would be great, if you could check my answers of the first review and points out what I have to do next, which thirdparty code I have to pack separately and which cod

Bug#807763: Looking for help to solve licence and third-party issues of the tomahawk-player package

2016-01-19 Thread Felix Natter
Stefan Ahlers writes: > Hi, > >> please ping me when the jreen is accepted, I'll go in a new review spin. > > Ok, I'll do it. > >> please point to the sources, and look if the copyright shows them. >> http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/c/clementine/unstable_copyright > > Tomaha

Bug#807763: Looking for help to solve licence and third-party issues of the tomahawk-player package

2016-01-18 Thread Stefan Ahlers
Hi, > please ping me when the jreen is accepted, I'll go in a new review spin. Ok, I'll do it. > please point to the sources, and look if the copyright shows them. > http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/c/clementine/unstable_copyright Tomahawk and clementine uses the company lo

Bug#807763: Looking for help to solve licence and third-party issues of the tomahawk-player package

2016-01-18 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >after the first review of my draft of the tomahawk-player package, I >discussed the problem with the developers of the player and I commented >all point of the review. Unfortunately, I didn't get any further >response and so I really do not know what to do next. > >Because of this circumstanc

Bug#807763: Looking for help to solve licence and third-party issues of the tomahawk-player package

2016-01-18 Thread Stefan Ahlers
Dear mentors, after the first review of my draft of the tomahawk-player package, I discussed the problem with the developers of the player and I commented all point of the review. Unfortunately, I didn't get any further response and so I really do not know what to do next. Because of this circums