On 05/05/2016 19:07, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 2016-05-05 17:16, Giulio Paci wrote:
>>> One thing I'm not quite sure I follow yet is the change in the version
>>> numbering scheme, both upstream and in the package. This is how it looks
>>> to me:
>>>
>>> 1. Upstream re-used revision r1668 and
On 2016-05-05 17:16, Giulio Paci wrote:
>> One thing I'm not quite sure I follow yet is the change in the version
>> numbering scheme, both upstream and in the package. This is how it looks
>> to me:
>>
>> 1. Upstream re-used revision r1668 and added a -r3 suffix
>> -> "r1668" trades a bit of r
Hi Christian,
On 05/05/2016 11:08, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 2016-05-05 03:57, Giulio Paci wrote:
>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for an updated version of my package
>> "sequitur-g2p"
>
>>git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/sequitur-g2p.git
>
>> A package review is very we
Hi Giulio,
On 2016-05-05 03:57, Giulio Paci wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for an updated version of my package "sequitur-g2p"
>git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/sequitur-g2p.git
> A package review is very welcome as well.
Looks good to me. Nice to see that upstream incl
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear all,
I am looking for a sponsor for an updated version of my package "sequitur-g2p"
* Package name: sequitur-g2p
Version : 0.0.r1668.r3-1
Upstream Author : Maximilian Bisani
* URL :
http://www-i6.informatik.r
5 matches
Mail list logo