Bug#842166: renewed sponsorship-request

2017-01-09 Thread Roger Shimizu
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > The package is already in NEW and I don't think uploading a fix is worth > it so no. upload can be stacked, which means it's able to upload a new version while it's in NEW queue. though it seems it missed Stretch ... (soft freeze pass

Bug#842166: renewed sponsorship-request

2017-01-09 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >The package is already in NEW and I don't think uploading a fix is worth >it so no. you can still clone/reassign/retitle this bug to make it an ITP :) G.

Bug#842166: renewed sponsorship-request

2017-01-09 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 02:50:24PM +0100, Willem Vermin wrote: > Ok, I will not do that next time. > Do you require any action from me with regards to the package findent? The package is already in NEW and I don't think uploading a fix is worth it so no. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description:

Bug#842166: renewed sponsorship-request

2017-01-09 Thread Willem Vermin
Ok, I will not do that next time. Do you require any action from me with regards to the package findent? On 01/07/2017 02:48 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: Unfortunately I didn't check that before uploading but you didn't open an ITP bug and used the RFS bug number in the changelog instead. Thi

Bug#842166: renewed sponsorship-request

2017-01-07 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Unfortunately I didn't check that before uploading but you didn't open an ITP bug and used the RFS bug number in the changelog instead. This is wrong, don't do that next time. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#842166: renewed sponsorship-request

2016-12-23 Thread Willem Vermin
I uploaded a new version of findent: https://mentors.debian.net/package/findent https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/findent/findent_2.7.3-1.dsc The package is now build in chrooted sid. Please have a look again. Regards, Willem

Bug#842166: renewed sponsorship-request

2016-12-14 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 04:44:18PM +0100, Willem Vermin wrote: > Package is native, because the Debian package source is identical to the > pristine source. This is bad. Imagine someone else becomes the Debian maintainer. Also, with native packages you need to make another upstream release with eac

Bug#842166: renewed sponsorship-request

2016-12-14 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Why is the package native? Policy (5.6.12) says it's for the cases when "a piece of software was written specifically to be a Debian package, where the Debian package source must always be identical to the pristine source and therefore no revision indication is required

Bug#842166: renewed sponsorship-request

2016-12-14 Thread Willem Vermin
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "findent": * Package name: findent Version : 2.7.3 Upstream Author : Willem Vermin wver...@gmail.com * URL : findent.sourceforge.net * Licence : BSD-3 Section : development