Bug#851756: RFS: telegram-desktop/1.0.6-1 [ITP]

2017-02-11 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 01:33:40AM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Hi, Hi Boyuan! I do not assume the sponsoree is subscribed to either the bug or debian-mentors, so I suggest you always CC him. > I just heard that someone filed an RFS for telegram-desktop. Good job! Wish > that you could make this

Bug#851756: RFS: telegram-desktop/1.0.6-1 [ITP]

2017-02-02 Thread Boyuan Yang
Hi, I just heard that someone filed an RFS for telegram-desktop. Good job! Wish that you could make this package into good shape and put it into Debian. > I can't understand how pristine-tar works. Should I manually download [...] You should use upstream tarball when applicable. If we use the t

Bug#851756: RFS: telegram-desktop/1.0.6-1

2017-02-01 Thread Коля Гурьев
They really make new versions very often. But I've already built the package on v1.0.6 [1]. Also I fixed typo in d/copyright and wrote d/watch. (To be honest, I'd just copy-pasted it from uscan(1).) I can't understand how pristine-tar works. Should I manually download new tarball for each ne