Bug#864241: RFS: pnmixer/0.7.2-1 -- Simple mixer application for system tray

On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 06:08:10PM +0700, Arnaud wrote: > Hi Adam, > > > On the other hand, an upload with two new changelog entries, while mildly > > unrecommended, is fine -- but it's good to remind the uploader that he or > > she needs to manually specify "-v0.7-1" when repacking the source as

Bug#864241: RFS: pnmixer/0.7.2-1 -- Simple mixer application for system tray

Hi Adam, > * New upstream release. > - - Remove deprecated gnome-common macros/variables. Closes: #929881. > + - Remove deprecated gnome-common macros/variables. Closes: #829881. > - Resize icons in menu. Closes: #816124. > * Remove manual page (now shipped by upstream). > * Bump Gtk+ required

Bug#864241: RFS: pnmixer/0.7.2-1 -- Simple mixer application for system tray

Hi all, sorry for late reply ! > > > > Done, the watch file seem to work according to `uscan`, but > > mentors.debian.net says there's a problem. I'm not sure what's wrong. > > > > Take a look on [1] as an example, your `watch` file is broken > > presumably since you're calling `uupdate`

Bug#864241: RFS: pnmixer/0.7.2-1 -- Simple mixer application for system tray

Hello, > > Done, the watch file seem to work according to `uscan`, but > mentors.debian.net says there's a problem. I'm not sure what's wrong. > > Take a look on [1] as an example, your `watch` file is broken > presumably since you're calling `uupdate` directly. > >

Bug#864241: RFS: pnmixer/0.7.2-1 -- Simple mixer application for system tray

Hey, anyone willing to sponsor this package ? This new version makes the build reproducible, and I think it's something that Debian wants, so... Well, up to you. Cheers, Arnaud On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:07:25 +0800 Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 18:17 +0700, Arnaud

Bug#864241: RFS: pnmixer/0.7.2-1 -- Simple mixer application for system tray

On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 18:17 +0700, Arnaud wrote: > Is it a correct way of doing things ? If the tarball you upload to Debian is bit-for-bit identical to the tarball you upload to or get from github, then yes, otherwise no. I used diffoscope to compare the tarball uploaded to github with the

Bug#864241: RFS: pnmixer/0.7.2-1 -- Simple mixer application for system tray

Hi Paul, thx for the review. > >> The package is now built with `gbp` from a git tag. I guess it fixes the >> problem. > Please verify that is the case. Well, I'm not a 100% sure that I'm doing it right here. Let me explain the situation. PNMixer switched to CMake, so there is no more 'make

Bug#864241: RFS: pnmixer/0.7.2-1 -- Simple mixer application for system tray

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Arnaud wrote: > mentors.debian.net says there's a problem. I'm not sure what's wrong. Probably due to the old version of uscan it uses. > The package is now built with `gbp` from a git tag. I guess it fixes the > problem. Please verify that is the case. > I

Bug#864241: RFS: pnmixer/0.7.2-1 -- Simple mixer application for system tray

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pnmixer" * Package name: pnmixer Version : 0.7.2-1 Upstream Author : Nick Lanham, Julian Ospald, Arnaud Rebillout * URL : https://github.com/nicklan/pnmixer *