(trimmed down a bit)
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 06:49:48PM -0400, Antonio Russo wrote:
> On 6/22/18 4:17 AM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> > - given the different licences and thus parts of the archive, I am not
> > sure whether we can merge zfs-dkms and spl-dkms inside Debian
> It would be a real pi
Antonio Russo:
> On 6/22/18 4:17 AM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
>>
>> as promised, and unfortunately delayed a bit longer than I wanted.
>> thanks for the initial push - some of the points are more for a
>> discussion with upstream regarding their inclusion of some variant of
>> this, some are for d
On 6/22/18 4:17 AM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
>
> as promised, and unfortunately delayed a bit longer than I wanted.
> thanks for the initial push - some of the points are more for a
> discussion with upstream regarding their inclusion of some variant of
> this, some are for debian experimental.
>
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 12:17:13AM -0400, Antonio Russo wrote:
> I have packaging of zfsonlinux (for upstream git revisions) that
> is in need of review [1]. It builds, and zfs-dkms builds as well.
> I have only done very superficial testing (i.e., the zfs module
> loads, you can create a pool).
>
I have packaging of zfsonlinux (for upstream git revisions) that
is in need of review [1]. It builds, and zfs-dkms builds as well.
I have only done very superficial testing (i.e., the zfs module
loads, you can create a pool).
This was somewhat nontrivial because upstream recently merged spl,
the "
5 matches
Mail list logo
