Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

2024-06-24 Thread Samo Pogačnik
Hi Daniel, i prepared another candidate for the 0.4.6-1 release ( https://salsa.debian.org/spog/git-subrepo/-/commit/f96eeedd0e96b6f2bbcc8c013909de5d5325cafe ), hoping it ticks all the boxes and more:) I made the PR upstream (https://github.com/ingydotnet/git-subrepo/pull/623) and added

Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

2024-06-14 Thread Daniel Gröber
Hi Samo, On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 09:55:31PM +0200, Samo Pogačnik wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Dne 14.06.2024 (pet) ob 20:50 +0200 je Daniel Gröber napisal(a): > > Below you're not ACK'ing some of my comments again. With email review you > > really kind of have to say something about each comment

Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

2024-06-14 Thread Samo Pogačnik
Hi Daniel, Dne 14.06.2024 (pet) ob 20:50 +0200 je Daniel Gröber napisal(a): > > Below you're not ACK'ing some of my comments again. With email review you > really kind of have to say something about each comment otherwise it's > really hard to tell if you just missed one or not and it's easier

Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

2024-06-14 Thread Daniel Gröber
Hi Samo, On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 07:15:40PM +0200, Samo Pogačnik wrote: > Thanks for the review. I'll do my best to include as much as i know how > to into another 'release candidate', however it may take me a while. Thanks for working on this :) Recent discussion on d-devel makes me think

Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

2024-06-14 Thread Samo Pogačnik
Hi Daniel, Thanks for the review. I'll do my best to include as much as i know how to into another 'release candidate', however it may take me a while. I also have some additional concerns/questions below... Dne 10.06.2024 (pon) ob 22:26 +0200 je Daniel Gröber napisal(a): > In general you're

Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

2024-06-10 Thread Daniel Gröber
Hi Samo, On Sat, Jun 01, 2024 at 10:01:53AM +0200, Samo Pogačnik wrote: > I prepared a new 0.4.6-1 release with patched upstream regarding: > - bash-completition integration with git > - executable permissions on sourced-only files > - hashbangs inside sourced-only files > > I've also removed

Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

2024-06-01 Thread Samo Pogačnik
Hi Daniel, Dne 28.05.2024 (tor) ob 19:23 +0200 je Daniel Gröber napisal(a): > I'm not super happy with the approach of putting git-subrepo.d inside > /usr/share/git-subrepo tbh. I might be able to let it pass but it seems > lintian found another issue that needs patching anyway so you may as well

Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

2024-05-28 Thread Daniel Gröber
Hi Samo, On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 07:30:46PM +0200, Samo Pogačnik wrote: > https://salsa.debian.org/spog/git-subrepo/-/commit/42628d43faa4a05eb3dd3c4b75d9d194ce6bda90 I'm not super happy with the approach of putting git-subrepo.d inside /usr/share/git-subrepo tbh. I might be able to let it pass

Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

2024-05-11 Thread Samo Pogačnik
Dne 06.05.2024 (pon) ob 15:02 +0200 je Daniel Gröber napisal(a): > > Hmm. I'm not sure I like the idea of abusing libexec in this > way. Technically speaking it's for "internal binaries that are not intended > to be executed directly by users or shell scripts" this is clearly not the > case here.

Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

2024-05-07 Thread Samo Pogačnik
Hi Daniel, Dne 06.05.2024 (pon) ob 15:02 +0200 je Daniel Gröber napisal(a): > > To be clear force-push should never ever be done when collaborating on the > branche(s) with multiple people, except in the most dire of circumstances > and only if everyone involved is notified appropriately. I'll

Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

2024-05-06 Thread Daniel Gröber
Hi Samo, On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 10:48:01AM +0200, Samo Pogačnik wrote: > > So you should be doing something like this: > > > > $ git remote add upstream https://github.com/ingydotnet/git-subrepo.git > > $ git fetch upstream > > $ gbp import-ref -u 0.4.6 # this will do the upstream

Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

2021-01-04 Thread Daniel Gröber
Hi Samo, thanks for the quick review! On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 09:01:51PM +0100, Samo Pogačnik wrote: > Thanks for that. I sincerely hope, that you get through with this useful tool. I saw you submitted an RFS for git-subrepo a while back. I was wondering what happened with that. It's not clear

Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

2021-01-04 Thread Daniel Gröber
Hi Samo, On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 11:16:04PM +0100, Samo Pogačnik wrote: > Dne 04.01.2021 (pon) ob 22:11 +0100 je Daniel Gröber napisal(a): > > I saw you submitted an RFS for git-subrepo a while back. I was wondering > > what happened with that. It's not clear from what's in the BTS why it > >

Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

2021-01-03 Thread Daniel Gröber
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "git-subrepo": * Package name: git-subrepo Version : 0.4.3-1 Upstream Author : Ingy döt Net * URL : https://github.com/ingydotnet/git-subrepo * License